User talk:Gingerroll45

Unspecified source/license for File:Pushpavanam Iyer.png
Thanks for uploading File:Pushpavanam Iyer.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like PD-self (to release all rights), (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 13:45, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

May I use one of these? Source: (website dedicated to Carnatic Music) Author: Carnatica.net (now carnatica.in) or Source: (website dedicated to Madurai Mani Iyer) Author:

And for Rajam Pushpavanam can I use this? Source: (Magazine devoted to the Performing Arts) Author: or this http://www.sruti.com/images/issue-256.jpg

Gingerroll45 (talk) 04:53, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Pushpavanam Iyer.png listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Pushpavanam Iyer.png, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Pkbwcgs (talk) 19:21, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Rajam Pushpavanam


A tag has been placed on Rajam Pushpavanam, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. &raquo; Shadowowl  &#124;  talk  20:14, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Rajam Pushpavanam


The article Rajam Pushpavanam has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Spammy article with things like 'great (2x), famous, much sought after, great success, wore the best, great sacrifice, great woman."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. &raquo; Shadowowl  &#124;  talk  10:47, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Rajam Pushpavanam for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rajam Pushpavanam is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Rajam Pushpavanam until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. &raquo; Shadowowl  &#124;  talk  13:56, 26 July 2018 (UTC)