User talk:Ginguladin

February 2022
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Gehraiyaan (film) have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 06:22, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Gehraiyaan (film) was changed by Ginguladin (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.915149 on 2022-02-14T06:22:54+00:00

Hi Ginguladin! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of an article several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Please do not add back poorly written synopsis.. Ab207 (talk) 06:47, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Gehraiyaan (film), you may be blocked from editing. — Manti  core  11:02, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Gehraiyaan (film). ― Tuna NoSurprises Please  13:58, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Gehraiyaan (film). ― Tuna NoSurprises Please  14:00, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Mako001 (C) (T)  14:03, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people, as you did at User talk:Mako001. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. ''Oh dear. Off to WP:ANI now. Indef block for you I guess.'' Mako001 (C) (T)  14:16, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

ANI notice
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Mako001 (C) (T)  14:24, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

February 2022
 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Doug Weller talk 15:33, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Doug Weller talk 15:34, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Wrong time for first block. As for the indefinite block, any reviewing Admin should see the filter log, forgot to check first. Doug Weller talk 15:36, 16 February 2022 (UTC)