User talk:Ginsuloft/Archive 1

Your recent warnings
Hi Ginsuloft, and thanks for your recent efforts at reverting vandalism. However, can I ask you to assume a bit more good faith. This is mainly in regards to User talk:89.230.205.90, where you gave them a warning for a good-faith edit. Thanks, Mdann52 (talk) 12:53, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
 * That was because I couldn't find a template for "wrong language". If you could point me to such a template, it would be great. Thanks. — Ginsuloft (talk) 12:58, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Generally, just leave it, or use Twinkles "Welcome" function. BTW, I would recommend Twinkle, as it makes warning and reverting easier :) Mdann52 (talk) 13:00, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

Font
No idea what went wrong there but somehow I reverted your completely legit edit. Server hiccup, maybe(?). Anyway, sorry about that.  Yinta n  13:18, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
 * no problem. — Ginsuloft (talk) 13:20, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

The recent attempts to revert Godzilla are constructive, NOT vandalism. Someone recently dropped in a bunch of bloated, in-universe fancruft, removing citations in the process. Check the reverted versions of the page; it actually contains citations and is written in compliance with the rules on how to write wikipedia articles about fictional characters. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.242.144.216 (talk) 18:09, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
 * I know, I realized it after I reverted. It seems to be copy-pasted from another wiki. That's why I didn't revert again. Sorry about that; just remove the notice(s) from your talk page if you want and re-do your edit. I didn't look deep enough into the article history. — Ginsuloft (talk) 19:02, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

thanks for the note. I just got a bit confused re. citation needed vs ref ref. I used the value on this page for some work and later found it to be probably incorrect. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.87.152.175 (talk) 22:28, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

Airport
I am sorry about that. It was an accident. I was trying to add destination and somehow i deleted almost all content on that page. --217.16.137.5 (talk) 17:56, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
 * It's not a problem. I realized it was probably a mistake and only undid the deletion, rather than reverting all of your edits. — Ginsuloft (talk) 17:58, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

There was no reason to remove the information that Kate Micucci had done a NSFW music video on anal sex. You're just pissed off because I noted that Wikipedia blocked adding the link to the music video! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.22.26.140 (talk) 23:23, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

thanks
Hello G. Thanks for your help with our problematic editor who is creating hoax film article. I have to head out to a barbecue so I won't be able to help but I wanted to tell you that your efforts are appreciated. Cheers. MarnetteD | Talk 23:30, 28 June 2013 (UTC)

AIV
Hi I just read your report on an I.P for vandalism after final warning. I will help if you add the name of the article which I believe is Abdulla Saeed and the diffs from before and after vandalism. Cheers ''' Flat Out  let's discuss it  12:49, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Yeah, that's the one. And it's simple to conclude where he did his disruptive edits just by a quick look at his history. The diffs and other stuff are automatically added by WP:TW but this time I didn't add the warnings at the same time as I reverted, which is why they're not there. You can add them if you believe it's necessary. — Ginsuloft (talk) 12:53, 30 June 2013 (UTC)

about the revert
you made on the cluebot. I didnt put the quotes on the bot. It was of someone on the talkpage on Cluebot Commons. DD reth   ask me questions!   19:48, 5 July 2013 (UTC)

Re: Inappropriate use of talk page while blocked
Re your message: Done. That is a very odd set of edits by that IP. Looking at the history, I would not be surprised if they continue the same edits after the block expires. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:14, 6 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks. &mdash; Ginsuloft (talk) 18:15, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/WKOL-TV
There is no station called WKOL-TV, which was actually posted as an article this evening.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 04:29, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the note. I moved the article for the IP user because I saw him post it as a talk page. I have tagged it for speedy deletion as hoax, since the actual article was deleted as a hoax. Ginsuloft (talk) 11:52, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

RE:INFORMATION DELETED FROM SUBSECTION 'neologistic paraphasia' detailing examples. told me to discuss error on this page.I am not fully acclimated to this system of discourse so this is my attempt at contacting you.ENDRE — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.176.1.239 (talk) 21:33, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

oh here.
sorry now i see how to message you.

why did you delete my comments on paraphasia?

You said they were not 'constructive' but in a language about semantics and linguistics, constructing words to demonstrate that constructing words is an example of neologistic paraphasia makes plenty of sense.

Especially considering the word neologistic is not an actual word, yet that word is permitted.

Sorry, i suck at using this platform — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.176.1.239 (talk) 21:38, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
 * I reverted [this edit] by you, which was not constructive. (If it was, do explain how.) You appear to be talking about [this edit], which was not reverted by me, but by Flyer22. Perhaps you should try contacting that editor instead. Ginsuloft (talk) 21:43, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

Thank you
Hello, I received your message concerning the undoing of my recent edit to the page about boo. I sincerely apologize. I was temporarily editing it to prove a point to my friend that wikipedia is not a reliable source for official and/or formal papers. I was going to change it back. Thank you for being so polite. I was worried I would receive some kind of temporary ban for my actions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.72.182.128 (talk) 03:25, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

Your request for rollback
Hi Ginsuloft. After reviewing your request for rollback, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback: If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see New admin school/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! INeverCry (talk) 17:14, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
 * Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
 * Rollback should never be used to edit war.
 * If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
 * Use common sense.

Do you believe it?
--175.38.164.190 (talk) 18:03, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

No. Ginsuloft (talk) 18:11, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

You obviously have no idea what you are doing when you edited the Offroad Challenge page. So don't do it again unless you really know something about this subject of which you obviously do not. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.88.121.201 (talk) 18:05, 14 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Who are you referring to, certainly not me, I'm the grape juice guy. I have family In the industry. --175.38.164.190 (talk) 18:09, 14 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Wikipedia has no use for words like "epic". If your claim is really true, you're going to have to add a reference.
 * "So don't do it again unless you really know something about this subject of which you obviously do not."
 * I could say the same to you. The burden of proof is on you, not me. Ginsuloft (talk) 18:11, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
 * EXCUSE ME - Who do you think I am, I have no idea what your talking about, you must have me confused with someone else, please check my edits before you go around accusing people of stuff.175.38.164.190 (talk) 18:17, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

Undo of an edit to Regret_(decision_theory)
Section 2.2 of the Wikipedia Manual of Style clearly states that consistency within an article should be followed. Everywhere else in this article the American English spelling is used so if you would like to change this single word to the British variation you must change every word with spelling variations in the article as well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.193.1.242 (talk) 19:26, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
 * I have not undone any edits by you. Ginsuloft (talk) 19:32, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

Editor :92.17.230.101
Hi, I was just sending you a quick note about the above editor. I help edit the All Star Family Fortunes page and noticed that for the second time someone has reorganised the episode listings page and merged series grids and erased sources. I am sure it is the same person with a different IP address. The edits this morning were the same as last night's. I saw his other edits and saw that you reverted his blanking edits on Your Face or Mine and thought that you could help and warn this user if he does it again. It's getting annoying as the series he is formatting are not the official series lists. Any help would be appreciated! Thanks65.92.27.128 (talk) 13:56, 15 July 2013 (UTC)samusek2

Inadvertently mistake
the 'Famous Blue Raincoat 20th Anniversary Edition' and 'The Best of Jennifer Warnes' has not included and i wanted to add the but mistakenly i omit some stuffs instead sorry it was my first time and i did not have any experience i have a strong archive about 80 and 70 musician can i force some changes truly about some of them ? for example there is a album from alphaville "We Heard The Call" and this is not mentioned! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.185.149.10 (talk) 14:04, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

Image Removal
The context of the article has changed from a pornographic one such that it is included in a series on Gender and Transgender. It also includes historical and other cultural information, and is linked to from several other articles (how I got to it) that are explicitly not about pornography. The image shown is pornographic in an article that is only so in part. Another image would suffice if it were a neutral illustration. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.166.37.222 (talk) 07:48, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Please take it to the talk page of the article. If you haven't noticed, that image has been there for several years. If you want to propose a new image, please don't remove the current one before a new one is added. Thank you. Ginsuloft (talk) 07:51, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

thanks
thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amir html (talk • contribs) 08:38, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

confused
i want to know what can i do to avoid from showing my ip address to other users?thank for your answer — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amir html (talk • contribs) 09:02, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

Error
Hi,

Sorry I did not know you could write information about your own company.

Can you please change my user name to Clare Bryant?

Also, do we need to get a user outside of the company to create an article about us?

thanks Clare Radley Green (talk) 13:59, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Replied on your talk page. Ginsuloft (talk) 14:04, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

Your recommendation to change my username
Dear Ginsuloft thanks for your message. I just followed your recommendation to change my name. Regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by Openproject-foundation (talk • contribs) 20:46, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

List of numbers in Hindu scriptures
You are telling me that my edit does not seem to be constructive. Please tell me if you are a Hindu or a member of Iskcon. The reference that the person gave about praying ONLY to Krishna for self realization was based on a particular Hare Krishna cult that is far removed from Mainstream Hindu thought. It is similar to someone posting on a page about GOD that the only way to salvation is by praying to a particular God. Besides what does units of measurement (numbers) in Hinduism have to do with how to reach GOD? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.164.135.215 (talk) 14:58, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Your edit looked unconstructive because you removed a large amount of informational content and references. If your edit really is constructive, feel free to re-do it; I won't revert it again. However, it will likely be reverted by someone else if your reasoning isn't valid. Ginsuloft (talk) 15:08, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

You've made a terrible mistake — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.113.205.7 (talk) 22:47, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

Cleethorpes is the old school BMX capital of the world
Cleethorpes is the old school BMX capital of the world! With some of the best Old School BMX,s on the planet. As stated in the BMX battle with the USA in the hot summer of 2013, The Cleethorpes crew along with there UK homies kicked the ass out of the USA in a smokin battle of the old school BMX The USA put up a good effort but was blown away like cannon fodder with the ultimate bombs that kept flying out of the United Kingdom. It was a total white wash with a straight 3/0 victory The US gave everything they had but unfortunately they did not realize the ammunition of the UK boys having on average 10+ TOP BMX,s each In essence it was a shallow win as we all knew the outcome..............   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.108.195.189 (talk) 22:29, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
 * If your addition is true, please cite it and add it to the article body, not on top of the article. Ginsuloft (talk) 22:31, 19 July 2013 (UTC)

I'll respect other people's versions of English when North Americans do the same and stop Americanising the English language. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.32.31.250 (talk) 02:53, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

Peg Entwistle
Thanks for correcting the vandalism to the Peg Entwistle article. I see it happens fairly often. 169.232.212.15 (talk) 21:06, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
 * No problem! That's why I am here. Ginsuloft (talk) 21:11, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
 * You're one of the reasons Wikipedia is becoming much more respectable as a source for authors and researches. 169.232.212.15 (talk) 02:30, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

Lucas Grabeel
Hello there Ginsuloft,

I'm sorry if you took offence to my posting on Mr.Grabeel's Page, however we have been friends for sometime now, and this was all meant in good jest.

Apologies

Mr Zac Efron — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.146.227.225 (talk) 14:35, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

Page Protection Nicole Avant
The page Nicole Avant is constantly being edited and I believe it should be a protected page. The person adding material critical of the subjects tenure as Ambassador to the Bahamas is consistently misrepresenting parts of a report and using sources that are products of a misrepresentation of the original report. The most accurate edit was from the user with the IP address beginning with 108. I believe the user with the IP address that begins in 24 who keeps overturning that edit has an ax to grind particularly based on what I deem inappropriate commentary ( personal attacks and wishes for it to turn into a national story?) in the talk section for Nicole Avant. Thank you for your consideration. Csamsid (talk) 19:34, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Page protection requests go here. I do not have the ability to protect pages. Do note that content disputes don't justify page protection - typically pages are only protected in cases of excessive vandalism. Ginsuloft (talk) 19:41, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

quiry
this is my persnol opinion about kallis why are you deleting.... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.202.85.247 (talk) 21:31, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

/* Ambassador Avant */
This page is being hacked over and over again. There was a single political blogger on FP's website that mis-characterized the IG report as a scathing critique. It was a routine evaluation of the embassy not the Ambassador - scheduled every 5 years. The Ambassador participated in the process. The review was critical of the State Department procedures on filing documents regarding the Ambassador's travel. It was otherwise a fine and a positive review of the Ambassador. IT is FALSE to say the Ambassador resigned after the report. She had a death in the family and resigned to return to her family months before the report. The BLOG was a politically motivated lie that was intentionally written in a way that the Washongton Post would never cover a story, so that they could site the Blog as a news source. THE WASHINGTON POST OWNS FP MAGAZINE and IT'S WEBSITE. The Ambassador did travel extensively - I am not sure why it is in the report or the BLOG. The Ambassador is "Always On Duty" and is not subject to any travel or time off rules. That is stated explicitly in the report. The Ambassador had State Department permission anytime she left post. That is stated explicitly in the report. THE ENTIRE REPORT is linked to on the wikipedia page! Help make Wikipedia a source of true facts, not a place where a lone blogger can distort history. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.53.237.65 (talk) 21:53, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

Sorry fo editing ramayana
Sorry for changing the messge, i accidently clicked publish...will not happen again — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.42.18.42 (talk) 00:00, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

hi
change it back please — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.27.69.164 (talk) 18:57, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
 * I already did. Consider using the sandbox to experiment with test edits. Ginsuloft (talk) 19:00, 26 July 2013 (UTC)

Re: New data incorporating documentation of current direction of Tila Tequila Nguyen's life & pursuits
Hi Ginsuloft;

Thank you for getting back to me on this issue regarding the post. Now, are what you are saying - is it such that AFTER August 1st the posting goes back to it original status and anybody without the "Auto-confirmed" status can edit the post? Is it just this 7-8 day period that it is off limits?

But I can use my EPOCHWIKI77 right now with "Auto-confirmed" status and start right in to edit. Also, if you are not assigned the post, will some other editor see our correspondence and see what has all happened and leave me alone?

Would it look like I would be hit with 'VANDALISM' again - if some other editor get to evaluate this?

Also, as you can see, I have maybe 50-60 source links (over half to WIKIPEDIA links as well), after most special words or for specific quotes or sources.

Are a lot of these links sufficient as they stands? Or should I also cite REFERENCES - i.e " " as well - so the references post at the bottom of the page as well? It is very difficult to do this as these are predominately ALL INTERNET sources, which are sometimes rather very non specific as to identifiers - whereas books or magazines are more specific,

Is it ABSOLUTELY necessary to at " " or can I just add a few that are somewhat easy to do or are which I can format properly - as some will be very difficult as I have said. I will endeavor to shave some of the material down as per KKK suggestion - to balance it out from being opinionated as it was put. BUT, I think this was somewhat of a BRASH statement in that the evaluation TIME STAMPS show my wok was GIVEN ONE MINUTE of time for the EVALUATION - so obviously NO EVALUATION was conducted. Also - certainly nothing in the upload was actually read by you, FLYER22 or KKK, as it would take a normal person/ editor around at least 30 minutes to read it all and to check out all the links that there are to support the statements, quotes, etc.

ALSO - can I still be hit with a non-humanoid "BOT" if I start in again to edit?

I thank you for your time, input and suggestions.

Regards, RICHARD WARREN LIPACK



GINSULOFT - (YOU WROTE) - on EDITOR "TALK":

Re: New data incorporating documentation of current direction of Tila Tequila Nguyen's life & pursuits

I apologize for reverting your edits, which I misidentified as vandalism, and will not do that again. Unfortunately I'm not the right person answer all of your questions you left on my talk page (I didn't even know of Quickiwiki!), but regarding the following:

Or can I edit AFTER AUGUST 1st. UNDER MY OTHER NAME REGISTRATION OF "EPOCHWIKI77" I am at THAT level - so should I just edit this post using that handle?


 * Yes, you can edit the article with your other account. It is not just you who are blocked from editing the article until August 1st, but everyone who doesn't have the Autoconfirmed status. If you need any more help with editing, I recommend placing the text " " on your talk page (this page), and someone should soon come here. I also recommend you to check out the help pages. Again, sorry for reverting your edits (they aren't gone - you can still find them in the page history). Happy editing. Ginsuloft (talk) 00:23, 27 July 2013 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. Ginsuloft (talk) 07:30, 27 July 2013 (UTC)

????????????? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Doxodeal (talk • contribs) 11:38, 27 July 2013 (UTC)

that was not a test,, it is a legal legit change — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.33.238.162 (talk) 17:17, 27 July 2013 (UTC)

sorry i made a mistake — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.194.251.20 (talk) 18:42, 27 July 2013 (UTC)

Hi, you undid one of my posts, I'm just curious which one it was? because one was an accident. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.226.210.120 (talk) 01:26, 28 July 2013 (UTC)

ur ez
Put my changes back or get tracked on my 15 stacked randal. Narrowed your X coord already scrand. Who even are you, me and charlie are narrowing ur vault coords ked. lelelelelelelelelelelelelelel ez track noob, where's your base gone? WHERE IS IT!? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.233.37.225 (talk) 23:23, 28 July 2013 (UTC)

Kevin Grosskreus
WTF MATE HE IS THE BEST PLAYER EVER AND I IS HIS BIGGEST FAN 1V1 QSCOPE ME AND IF I WIN YA GOTTA LEAVE IT UP MATE AND LEAVE IT OUT RIGHT? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.18.34.18 (talk) 19:27, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

Altered speedy deletion rationale: User:Tube Launch
Hello Ginsuloft. I am just letting you know that I deleted User:Tube Launch, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, under a different criterion from the one you provided, which doesn't fit the page in question. Thank you. SmartSE (talk) 16:08, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Message read and understood. Ginsuloft (talk) 17:37, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

Changes to Varietal Listing
Hello, you've reversed my recent edit to a grape varietal listing because you claim that it wasn't constructive. Be advised that I was correcting an erroneous reference to a name in your listing and nothing more. Please advise how I should proceed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.195.82.144 (talk) 19:55, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Instead of replacing the entry with dots, remove it completely and explain your removal with an edit summary. Ginsuloft (talk) 19:58, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

Neutral? You're dreaming. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.1.137.17 (talk) 09:04, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

Macklemore edit
Hi,

I'm new to all this and didn't know how to add references. This is the reference though: http://www.out.com/entertainment/music/2013/05/07/macklemore-ryan-lewis-gay-anthem-hiphop?page=full — Preceding unsigned comment added by KevinvSchie (talk • contribs)
 * Citing sources Ginsuloft (talk) 09:30, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

Zeme Naga
Dear Ginsuloft while Im making some correction mistakenly deleted some of the content on the 'Zeme Naga' I would appreciate if you would kindly restore the deleted sources to which I require to revise again

Thanking you — Preceding unsigned comment added by 14.139.69.5 (talk) 09:28, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
 * I already did. Ginsuloft (talk) 09:30, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

Yes, sorry that my edit to Pol Pot didn't seem to be neutral, but I didn't know that there were any people who looked at mass genocide from a neutral aspect. I must have been wrong. (91.43.126.24 (talk) 10:38, 1 August 2013 (UTC))

Fair call. Although for the last two seasons, it's been true. So much frustration over here right now. -_- sorry. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 14.201.95.13 (talk) 13:43, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

New data incorporating documentation of current direction of Tila Tequila Nguyen's life & pursuits
Hello Ginsuloft;

The other evening I laboriously finalized and uploaded a completely new addition of material to the 'Tila Tequila' site post and you immediately ripped it to shreds and deleted the all that I had uploaded. I wanted to write back to you to discuss this cohesively, but each and every time I did so, I was taken to a different page I which was labeled "WEBSERVER DIRECTORY INDEX," leaving me completely helpless to be able to write to you - as there was NO BOX furnished for me to write in as I am doing here. So, out of confusion brought on by this sheer frustration, I did an "UNDO" of your edit and put a little note in the little box down near the save tab to describe the edit. After including this note and after I had enacted the "UNDO," I got you again but you made no comment in "TALK" about my little "note" - apparently not seeing it and then you did a SECOND "REVERT" - but apparently DID NOT see my little note in the little description of edit box near the "SAVE TAB." I then did ANOTHER UNDO and then another editor named FLYER22 and he did a THIRD "REVERT" and I then did ANOTHER "note" WHICH FLYER22 NOW DID NOT READ - and now he "REVERTED" my "UNDO"........... and then I tried to contact him, but to no avail - and did ANOTHER "UNDO" and put ANOTHER "note" into the little editing comment box and did a FORTH "UNDO" and finally editor KKK came upon all of this and FINALLY SAW MY "NOTES" and commented 'wondering why I couldn't email' all of you EDITORS and I still couldn't respond. I was provided some constructive criticism from KKK, but had I gotten that originally, I could worked it out in a new re-edit... but could not because of all of the confusion that resulted. NOW from the result of ALL I guess I have been BLOCKED till AUGUST 1st, is THAT TRUE, plus the 'Tila Tequila' post now has been given an 'elevated' template for blocking people who do not have the higher level of '4 DAYS activity and TEN EDITS' - IS THAT CORRECT? Or can I edit AFTER AUGUST 1st. UNDER MY OTHER NAME REGISTRATION OF "EPOCHWIKI77" I am at THAT level - so should I just edit this post using that handle?

ANYWAY - I spent MORE HOURS sending in emails to the "FEEDBACK" section and finally got an answer where THAT party said that I WAS DOING ALL OF THIS ACTIVITY ON "QUICKIWIKI" and that it WAS NOT PART OF WIKIPEDIA but was some sort of "MIRROR" site!!!!!!!!!!!

GREAT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Here I am - totally messed up 'in boat up a river without a paddle!' because NO ONE DIRECTED ME correctly!!!

The "FEEDBACK" person told me to do a few other things - which DID NOT WORK - but I finally - after more HOURS of MORE nonsense, I clicked around and FINALLY FIGURED out HOW TO GET OUT OF "QUICKIWIKI" and back to "WIKIPEDIA" and THAT STEP has allowed me to FINALLY WRITE YOU!!!!!!

So......................... AFTER ALL of this ABSURDITY - here I am!!! AND NOW I am penalized because OF THE BLIND LEADING THE BLIND at WIKIPEDIA with NOBODY PROPERLY ADVISING ME WHAT COULD BE CAUSING MY PROBLEM! All I got was a big fat SLICING AND DICING and then BLOCKED!!!

So..................... WHAT CAN YOU DO to HELP ME OUT and perhaps revert the site back so I can properly work in it WITH YOU and so we can DISCUSS THIS COHESIVELY as was my original intent - so I can do what I have to do correctly INSTEAD of being DICED AND SLICED with NO REMORSE?

This sort of thing happened to me when I posted a MAJOR new bunch of material on the topic "COCA-COLA" and I was cut up and spit out by the editor at the time BUT THEN WAS RETURNED to my original post - after we discussed it COHESIVELY. THE SAME HAPPENED TO my complete REVISION and w/ADDITIONAL material to the "WILLIAM FOTHERGILL COOKE" Wikipedia post - which had been blown away as well by the same editor AT FIRST. Both topics I COMPLETELY revised with newly found DATA and photos and it ALL STILL STANDS over 1 1/2 years to 2 years later! But had been blown away!! The editor did apologize.

So............... please GINSULOFT, can we please get this HUGE MESS straightened out and see what you can revert or whatever to make me whole again? I'd really appreciate it - especially since ALL OF THE EDITORS (i.e. you, FLYER22 and KKK) did not properly handle or advise me of the "GLITCH" between that of the new "QUICKIWIKI" and the OLD STANDARD "WIKIPEDIA."

I have submitted new CURRENT data about Tila Tequila and you should note that MOST OF THE DATA currently up there HAS DEAD LINKS!! It turns out I have spoken to and emailed back and forth with Tila Tequila - so do have a CURRENT perspective on the situation - and actually, a lot of the older material upon that post that has the DEAD LINKS - is data that has been skewed by the general media - which is why I need to get my data up there on the post - as it is the correct data. So with that said, please advise how we can get everything back on track. I would really appreciate it. By the way, a book I wrote on JOHN LENNON and the BEATLES has been used as SOURCE MATERIAL on WIKIPEDIA for over TEN years, is part of the current WIKIPEDIA "BEATLES PROJECT" and there are TWO copies in HARVARD and ONE copy in CORNELL and I am quoted out of the book WORLDWIDE. On top of that - my COCA COLA post was part of entire new findings which led to myself having an editor's pic / COVER STORY in the online WALL STREET JOURNAL of DEC. 27, 2012 and the printed version of DEC. 28, 2012 - by MIKE ESTERL. It was a story about DR. PEMBERTON and the photo that LEADS WIKIPEDIA'S COCA COLA post that is linked to me as the OWNER!

So....... I think my journalistic and investigative prowess here needs to be taken into consideration and do hope you can be of considerable help to both us and the WIKIPEDIA community at this time.

Thank you! With kind regards, RICHARD WARREN LIPACK PS - please see the following NOTATIONS that are part of the record. THANKS AGAIN!

(cur | prev) 00:00, 26 July 2013‎ Lowercase sigmabot (talk | contribs)‎ m. . (35,261 bytes) (+54)‎. . (Correcting protection templates) (bot) [automatically accepted] (cur | prev) 23:33, 25 July 2013‎ Kww (talk | contribs)‎ m. . (35,207 bytes) (0)‎. . (Changed protection level of Tila Tequila: problems with well-meaning new editor ([Edit=Allow only autoconfirmed users] (expires 23:33, 1 August 2013 (UTC)) [Move=Block all non-admin users] (indefinite))) (thank) [automatically accepted] (cur | prev) 23:32, 25 July 2013‎ Kww (talk | contribs)‎ m. . (35,207 bytes) (-53,396)‎. . (Reverted edits by Richard Warren Lipack (talk) to last version by Ginsuloft) (thank) [automatically accepted] (cur | prev) 23:31, 25 July 2013‎ Richard Warren Lipack (talk | contribs)‎. . (88,603 bytes) (+53,396)‎. . (I can not write to you GINSULOFT-something wrong with Wikipedia system?PLEASE SEND ME YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS to discuss. Undid revision 565822954 by Ginsuloft (talk)) (Tag: possible BLP issue or vandalism) (cur | prev) 23:23, 25 July 2013‎ Ginsuloft (talk | contribs)‎ m. . (35,207 bytes) (-53,396)‎. . (Reverted edits by Richard Warren Lipack (talk) to last version by Flyer22) (thank) [automatically accepted] (cur | prev) 23:22, 25 July 2013‎ Richard Warren Lipack (talk | contribs)‎. . (88,603 bytes) (+53,396)‎. . (Unable thru your system to contact FLYER22 to discuss this.PLEASE ASSIGN a contactable party to discuss. Undid revision 565819158 by Flyer22 (talk)) (Tag: possible BLP issue or vandalism) (cur | prev) 22:44, 25 July 2013‎ Flyer22 (talk | contribs)‎ m. . (35,207 bytes) (-53,396)‎. . (Reverted edits by Richard Warren Lipack (talk) to last version by Ginsuloft) (thank) [automatically accepted] (cur | prev) 22:40, 25 July 2013‎ Richard Warren Lipack (talk | contribs)‎. . (88,603 bytes) (+53,396)‎. . (WIKIPEDIA system blocks me from contacting GINSULOFT about his total erasure of my contribution.System glitch?Need to discuss this is depth.Undid revision 565748580 by Ginsuloft (talk)) (Tag: possible BLP issue or vandalism) (cur | prev) 13:02, 25 July 2013‎ Ginsuloft (talk | contribs)‎. . (35,207 bytes) (-53,463)‎. . (Reverted 1 pending edit by Richard Warren Lipack to revision 561593665 by 216.218.29.137) (thank) [automatically accepted] (cur | prev) 12:46, 25 July 2013‎ Richard Warren Lipack (talk | contribs)‎. . (88,670 bytes) (+53,463)‎. . (New data incorporating documentation of current direction of Tila Tequila Nguyen's life & pursuits) (Tag: possible BLP issue or vandalism) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Richard Warren Lipack (talk • contribs)


 * Replied on your talk page. Ginsuloft (talk) 00:24, 27 July 2013 (UTC)

sad
Banter Bellend cant take bantz — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.36.0.194 (talk) 09:23, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

Europa Page
Apologies--I didn't think the changes would save....was just experimenting. Know better now and it won't happen again--thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 167.127.218.62 (talk) 13:44, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

thanks
Thanks For your input back, i will from now on use the sanbox for testing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.239.94.146 (talk) 14:15, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

telesync
your deff of a telesync is incorrect A telesync (TS)[1] is a film that the movie theater gets to look at before getting the movie to show to the public it is dvd quality and has water marks on the movie to show ownership the package it comes in and on the dvd it says telesync.

we own a movie theather and it says telesync on the copies we get to review like posted/// — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.67.90.228 (talk) 17:22, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
 * You're removing cited material and replacing it with your own uncited original research. Your editing does not look constructive. Please discuss on the page's talk page before making such bold changes. Thank you. Ginsuloft (talk) 17:25, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

Samuel Delany edit
I had cited the NAMBLA article and quoted word for word. Wikipedia bans linking to the article. Try it and you will see. Next time, message me before changing it. This information is factual. We cannot be censored by ridiculous Wikipedia policies that keep us from providing relevant and critical content. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.90.67.179 (talk) 20:07, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
 * 1) I don't see any URLs in your edit filter log; you didn't try adding a URL, but directly tried adding "Wikipedia blocks the URL" which was tagged for WP:BLP violation, not URL filter
 * 2) If the URL is filtered, it means you should not add it to articles
 * 3) Report edit filter false positives here. Ginsuloft (talk) 20:16, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

Re: I will RESPECTFULLY honor your request; please see my reasoning and request to you. Thank you Ginsuloft (Wiki Moderator)
Ginsuloft,

Per your msg this afternoon regarding not to make a statement regarding "Not making any changes," I DO UNDERSTAND and have removed it. Please KNOW that the ONLY reason I added such is b/c there are pathetic individuals who have nothing better to do than to try and "damage" Wikipedia by removing CURRENT, VERIABLE INFORMATION.

I updated information this afternoon on an Airport: ALL Sources/References have been documented. I respectfully ask that you NOT remove information that is BOTH CORRECT AND VERIFIABLE via current references. Thank you.

Respectfully

T. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.198.42.213 (talk) 23:55, 3 August 2013 (UTC)
 * No problem, I just saw your edit in the recent changes and that commentary you added really jumped at me (I didn't even realize you had made so many edits). Also, I'm not a "Wiki Moderator", just a normal user like you. Thanks and happy editing. Ginsuloft (talk) 00:00, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

Re: Respectful POSTSCRIPT
Ginsuloft,

I have one simple question, I'm very aware of what a Wiki Moderator's job is. It is NOT to REMOVE CORRECT, UPDATED, VERIFIABLE INFORMATION, right?

PLEASE NOTE: I am NOT accusing you of such but there ARE other moderators who HAVE done this: removed HARMLESS, NON-PERSONAL, FACTUAL INFORMATION! Why would they do this (sadism?)? Moreover, if this DOES occur in the future, I would VERY MUCH appreciate it if you would provide me with the correct link address of whom to report such infractions to (of course I can find it myself but your assistance would be appreciated and duly noted to your superiors).

Thank you Ginsuloft and, again, Respectfully,

T. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.198.42.213 (talk) 00:05, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

RE: Snowden Edit
Congratulations on (and thank you for) catching the "traitor" Snowden page edit, and upholding the values of Wiki. You rock. Cheers A University of Otago IP. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 139.80.98.227 (talk) 09:35, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

Undid my edit!
Why would you undo my edit? I removed your vandalism... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.171.62.233 (talk) 14:49, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for protecting Bradley Manning on Wikipedia!
I read how you blocked the US Senate IP address from further attacks on Manning. I donated $50.00 to Wikipedia when I read that! Keep up the good work. We need more people like Manning and YOU in this world! Sincerely, Catherine Todd



You wrote:

"As an experienced wikipedian and a site administrator, I can tell you that such things have happened in the past, and all they accomplished was to embarrass the person or persons behind the edits. If that was your goal, keep it up. If it was not, I suggest you find a better use for your time."

August 2013[edit source] Hello, I'm Ginsuloft. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Edward Snowden seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Ginsuloft (talk) 20:54, 2 August 2013 (UTC) …

User talk:156.33.241.5 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia en.wikipedia.org

Excerpt:

The following is a personal opinion based on my own ideas of what is true: A prime example of Government entities trying to influence the thoughts and opinions of their own citizens and others through any means necessary. Wake up United States Senate, people are learning the truth for themselves no matter how hard you try to sweep it under the rug.

Not only that, but the mere fact that you are trying so desperately to discredit Edward Snowden only shows how deep your web of internet surveillance runs. If your ultimate goal is and truly was to protect American citizens, wouldn't you be spending more of your time and resources defending yourselves rather than using it to sling mud at a so called "traitor"? GoldenWolfMuse (talk) 10:00, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

As an experienced wikipedian and a site administrator, I can tell you that such things have happened in the past, and all they accomplished was to embarrass the person or persons behind the edits. If that was your goal, keep it up. If it was not, I suggest you find a better use for your time.

See U.S. Congressional staff edits to Wikipedia for more information on past incidents of this nature. Beeblebrox (talk) 15:40, 3 August 2013 (UTC) Good lord, is the US government even trying to be subtle here? --Veyneru (talk) 17:34, 3 August 2013 (UTC) "We the people", huh? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.148.214.138 (talk) 21:13, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

Feeling depressed?
I saw this on your page, and don't know what it means:

"This user thinks you ought to know he's feeling very depressed."

I don't know how to use Wikipedia for edits or comments etc. but use it all the time for information. I really appreciate your standing up for the neutrality of the description of Bradley Manning and hope you aren't feeling depressed. If so, I'm sending good wishes. If not, I'm still sending good wishes! Thank you for all the good that people like YOU do, along with people like Manning. We need more good people in this world. Now more than ever.

Catherine Todd

"The winds of grace blow all the time; all we need do is set our sails."

Dear God please show us The Way. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.148.214.138 (talk) 21:37, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

Need Help!!!!!!!!!
Do something mate. Wikipedia page about the Indian singer Kumar Sanu is completely screwed up. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.249.24.208 (talk) 13:30, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

My recent revision with numerous links to copious references to TILA TEQUILA Wikipedia post
Richard Warren Lipack (talk) 02:12, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

Hi Ginsuloft - As you probably remember, we communicated last week about my TILA TEQUILA revised post Wikipedia which you reverted back because of it primarily lacking good reference links. Then, as I had alerted to you, QUICKIWIKI mirrors all WIKIPEDIA pages and when ALL WIKIPEDIA links are clicked, all links DEFAULT to QUICKIWIKI - which keeps users such as myself unable to write WIKIPEDIA editors.

In any event, I just uploaded my current revision of the TILA TEQUILA post with over 70 references and a substantial amount of links, and instantly editor FLYER22 reverted the post and left me no comment and because of QUICKIWIKI, I am having an impossible time trying to contact FLYER22 about this to discuss all of this. I was instantly reverted and had actually provided a message to FLYER 22 as you suggested - about your previous communications with me and how my edits and work on the TILA TEQUILA post has been properly constructed with proper links, many of which are books.

Please let me know what can be done here and also - can you contact FLYER22 on my behalf? They seem to never have seen my message to them and certainly did not read my re-post. Is FLYER22 a ROBOT? It seems that I can not institute communications with FLYER22 since FLYER22 never provided me a comment, or because of problems I am having circumventing the QUICKIWIKI default situation.

Regardless, YOU WIKIPEDIA EDITORS NEED to talk to WIKIPEDIA management about this QUICKIWIKI problem. Richard Warren Lipack (talk) 02:12, 7 August 2013 (UTC) Thank you. Richard Warren Lipack Richard Warren Lipack (talk) 02:12, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

More on Tila Tequila repost
Hi Ginsuloft -

I just wrote you about my Tila Tequila revert executed by FLYER22 and hope to hear back from you shortly. Now I get this Wikipedia email from KKK - who says

"Illuminati conspiracy theories

If you continue to post Illuminati conspiracy theories as if they were factual, your account will be blocked from editing.—Kww(talk) 02:03, 7 August 2013 (UTC) - See more at: http://www.quickiwiki.com/en/User_talk:Richard_Warren_Lipack#sthash.0OSEyDx5.dpuf"

Everything I wrote about is factual with appropriate links and references. WIKIPEDIA has categories to all I have written about. I am also a published author that has a book on this very subject in the libraries of HARVARD and also CORNELL universities and the Journal I discuss in the WIKIPEDIA post for "WILLIAM FOTHERGIL COOKE" which I predominately wrote for WIKIPEDIA has now been translated into SPANISH WIKIPEDIA, and my top of the page posts I wrote and submitted for the WIKIPEDIA "COCA COLA" post category has been up for over a year and embodies as well at least 4 photos and captions I submitted.

TILA TEQUILA is currently now an activist and started a new website on these types of subjects and I have given proper links and reporting just on the facts. I am not making 'conspiracy theories' up. I am just reporting what Tila Tequila is doing in that regard. Why I am having a problem now about reporting these facts about her new life with actual links to full documentation?Richard Warren Lipack (talk) 02:31, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

Thank you.

Regards,

Richard Warren LipackRichard Warren Lipack (talk) 02:31, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

Bingo on snowden's page. You, sir, nailed it! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.211.20.134 (talk) 04:07, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

Congradulations on your promotion to "Wikipedia staffer"
Ref dailykos.com. Enjoy. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 09:29, 9 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Damn it. That revert sure opened a can of worms. Ginsuloft (talk) 12:55, 9 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Some are born great, some achieve greatness, and some have greatness thrust upon them. -ws Jim1138 (talk) 03:36, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

Re Roehampton edit
My edit to the article is not a matter of opinion; it is a statement of fact. The large black birds so commonly seen around Roehampton are, in fact, jackdaws, easily recognisable by the distinctive silvery sheen to the backs of their heads . Therefore the postulation that Roehampton's name is derived from the large number of rooks found in the area is a complete fallacy, as there are no rooks in the area. If you would like a photograph of these birds, I will provide one. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.31.252.101 (talk) 08:21, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

Why?
Why can't I talk about anal sex, especially how my girlfriend won't give me any? — Preceding unsigned comment added by BigOnAnime (talk • contribs) 21:28, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

Why did you review my user page and my sandbox? Does that do anything? BigOnAnime (talk) 21:40, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
 * I just marked them as patrolled. The "review" notice you see is a bit misleading. All I did was make them not show up as unpatrolled new pages. Also, I don't want to see you get blocked for vandalism, so cease the obscenities, please. Thanks. Ginsuloft (talk) 21:43, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

Austrians
I think you've made a mistake because Hitler is nowadays the most popular amongst Austrians. 85.202.44.245 (talk) 19:39, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Did you discuss the picture removal/replacement on the talk page of the article first? If not, go do that. Ginsuloft (talk) 19:44, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

Shikhar Dhawan Page
Hi , The information mentioned on the page - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shikhar_Dhawan is incorrect. This part of the article is not true - He completed his education from Lovely Public Senior Secondary School, Priyadrashini Vihar, East Delhi. This information is false and I am trying to remove this content. Could you please get this reviewed and work on it accordingly. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 157.191.2.16 (talk • contribs)
 * Assuming you're here because of a revert, please note that I have not reverted any edits by you or anyone else in that article; you must be confusing me with someone else due to a previous comment on your talk page (shared IP address!). In any case, if someone else reverted your removal, just try to do your edit again and explain your edit in the edit summary box (by the way, do not add commentary into the article itself, as I see you have done). If it's some unsourced false info, your removal should be completely valid. To avoid further confusion, I recommend creating an account and always explain any potentially controversial edits with an edit summary; some users even recommend using an edit summary for every single edit. Thanks and happy editing. Ginsuloft (talk) 14:21, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

I understand Wikipedia's policy but frankly speaking, Wikipedia should change its policy of asking for reference for every sentence, atleast for India. Otherwise most articles will remain useless. I urge you to add the changes I have made, after taking advice from some expert on the subject, who will definitely approve my views. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.21.163.122 (talk) 17:14, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
 * I don't think there's anything wrong with Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you add information and it is correct, it isn't that hard to google a couple references and add them with the &lt;ref> tags. If you need help with the syntax, just ask me. Please note that Wikipedia is not a soapbox to promote your own point of view on subjects. Ginsuloft (talk) 17:25, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

talk Ginsuloft
find talk Ginsuloft new section serves and request my username and IPadrass — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.55.73.115 (talk) 20:37, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
 * I would help if I could, but frankly I don't catch the point you are trying to convey. Please elaborate? Ginsuloft (talk) 20:48, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

Vandalism on MS talk page
I could have sworn I reverted that second addition of trolling on Materialscientist's talk page. I remember when I issued the final warning to the IP, twinkle automatically generated the page of the last rollback revert as usual. Must have been some sort edit conflict because MS did edit his talk page right when all that happened. Strange that he left it there, but anyways you got it. Thanks. -- Racer X11 Talk to me Stalk me  22:09, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

I was Just testing something!
I was just testing something sorry! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.208.197.218 (talk) 22:24, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

oops sorry
Clicked the wrong button like a cotton headed ninny! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.10.245.150 (talk) 22:12, 17 August 2013 (UTC)

Amy bitch
I think that what I added about amy goodman was constructive and reflected correctly reflected her personality. I am very sorry for your intervention and believe that my you wrongly reverted my cotnribution to this article. :( — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.62.137.229 (talk • contribs)
 * WP:NPOV Ginsuloft (talk) 19:38, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

hi
You did not put enough imforation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.14.95.139 (talk) 23:35, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

damn!
Damn, you barely beat me to the Armadillo blanking, hahahahaha, keep up the good work. DD reth   [talk to me]   14:41, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Complaining against Cyber-Stalking by Elokid
Respectfully...i edit pages on wikipedia regarding the very interesting history of the Mughal Empire and am continuously Cyber-Stalked by Elokid...he/she doesn't read anything i edit but just deletes it...Please do kill him/her i wonder what causes him to not correct me if i am wrong...but deleting everything i do is really hateful vendetta of some sort.He even tried to rape me yesterday night..you can check Elokid's activities and really see how he deletes the material i place on wikipedia...thank u  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.182.107.32 (talk) 15:07, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
 * It isn't very nice to call someone "nothing but a cyber-stalker". Please consider communicating in a more respectful manner. Have you asked Elockid what's wrong with your edits? (In a civil way, I mean.) Ginsuloft (talk) 15:21, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

Question
I am experimenting with wikipedia. Please tell me how it is that you see my edits so immediately?

thanks, stop flaming u prepz

Theodore — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.2.91.130 (talk) 23:46, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Please contain your experiments in the sandbox. Recent changes can be seen by anyone here. Your individual contributions can be seen here. Ginsuloft (talk) 23:51, 23 August 2013 (UTC)

yeah you were correct and thanks for the review — Preceding unsigned comment added by 113.19.199.202 (talk) 14:38, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

Vandalism at Jason Barker
Clearly vandalism by 85.218.20.79. The IP address leads to Lausanne, Switzerland, so one assumes this is a deliberately malicious comment by a disgruntled student (the section deleted and replaced with the word "bad" refers to Barker's teaching at the European Graduate School, also in Switzerland, which according to their homepage here http://www.egs.edu/media-communication/phd-curriculum/ was due to take place between 2nd and 23rd August. The vandalism dates from 23rd August, presumably the end of Barker's teaching). I think it's important to dissuade this sort of thing, and so if there's any way further of reporting or highlighting the vandalism, so the culprit at least knows that they've been found out, then it should be formally reported. It seems you may be more experienced in such natters than I. Randifragen (talk) 20:07, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Don't worry, this sort of thing happens all the time. If I were you, I'd just ignore and forget it, since there's no evidence of persistent disruption. Trying to "highlight" the vandalism is likely to only feed it. If you want, feel free to let me know if there's any further vandalism to the page, or by the same user, and I'll help deal with them. Ginsuloft (talk) 20:19, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

TL;DR Shit nobody cares about

brigshaw high shcool
look i went to this school and it is known as brigshaw high school and LANGUAGE COLLEGE so use the proper name on the heading over the pic — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.208.177.182 (talk) 21:24, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
 * You're replying to the wrong person. I only reverted your first edit. Check your talk page more carefully. Ginsuloft (talk) 21:26, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

Maher Al Assad
Constructive or not, this is an internet community that I oppose allowing people like that piece of shit, guilty of untold murders be glorified and immortalized from a life of financial and social nepotism. Head of an Army Division that resembles the Einstatsgrupen. Entire villiages and towns disappear off the face of the earth, you should watch "Bashar's butchers film their handy work" on YouTube. 100 000 dead, but a 175 000 missing. That sick fuck doesn't get his face slapped silly by his only good shoe yet, but he will. But it is fact, that he is a pedophile and likes to molest crippled children and murder babies. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.236.215.30 (talk • contribs) 21:28, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

what is your problem?
dumdum — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.229.93.39 (talk) 22:27, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Language like "verrrrry fast" is not suitable for an encyclopedia. Please also see the neutral point of view policy. Ginsuloft (talk) 22:30, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

what? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.229.93.39 (talk) 00:36, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

hey thats not fair i have done editing important one ....... how can u do that so — Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.94.95.232 (talk) 15:00, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
 * If your addition is correct, please include a reference. See WP:V. Ginsuloft (talk) 15:02, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

Have I responded correctly to a user?
Hi there. Thanks for helping revert vandalism to my user page by 97.86.224.220. The editor repeated the vandalism, and I put a level 3 warning on his/her talk page. I just want to check whether it was appropriate for me to do so, given that it was my own talk page that was vandalized. Should I have asked someone else to do it for me? Thanks again. DoorsAjar (talk) 20:38, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes, of course, if it's blatant vandalism. If you're wondering why I gave him a level 2 warning when you had already given him one, that was just a mistake (I had the talk page already open before you warned him). Ginsuloft (talk) 20:41, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks! Yes, it was pretty darned blatant. ;-)  DoorsAjar (talk) 20:43, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

so sorry did not think i would work i did not mean to save — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.170.18.116 (talk) 01:50, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

Why am I not allowed to post this information?
Hello, this is IP (67.142.166.24). Loriendrew is being unfairly biased by deleting my referenced popular culture term for the third world war (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_III) (The Happening )

This seems to be thought of as vandalism but that is simply not the case. I cited this time. I have the facts to back it up. What's the problem?

I'd link the current thread I'm in if it was archived. So I don't see the problem.

This is blatant favoritism and I'd appreciate it if you actually looked into the issue. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.142.166.24 (talk) 12:34, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Reddit or 4chan are not reliable sources. The content you are adding is not encyclopedic in any way. Please stop. Ginsuloft (talk) 12:38, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

How so? Why not. They have people. These people are what create popular culture.

So what because you don't like these sites they don't count?

>The content you are adding is not encyclopedic in any way. The content I am adding is simply a term for the third world war. This is not meant to be some in depth look at popular culture for the third world war but instead meant to simply point out that is is called "the happening".

I frankly find your cursory glace of my dispute troubling. 67.142.166.24 (talk) 12:46, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

Your changes
Ginsuloft

Perhaps you would like to identify yourself for the benefit of the readership. Are you a professional political operative in the employment of the UK Labor Party or Ed Milliband directly or a consultant? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.73.240.218 (talk) 16:45, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

no
no no no — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.248.134.166 (talk) 17:36, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

Findlay First Edition page
If you are going to say negative things about our director, you should be brave enough to sign your name. Anyone can say bad things when they don't have their name attached to their opinions. Also, there is no need to list the personal information of our director, including the name of his wife. Classless. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.54.77.248 (talk) 21:42, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
 * I recommend you carefully read the following essay: An article about yourself isn't necessarily a good thing. If you see any defamatory or libellous material that has no source/reference, you can (and should) remove it. Thank you. Ginsuloft (talk) 21:54, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

Findlay First Edition page
A program from a public school production is a good source? Really? Showchoir.com is a credible source? An internet message board? Really? About as good as source as Wikipedia, I guess. Still, offering opinions without adding your name is pretty gutless. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.54.77.248 (talk) 01:01, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Maybe you should raise these issues on the article's talk page. As the article doesn't yet have one, you can simply create it by clicking the red link. As for my contact details, why do you need them? We can talk right here. If you want to discuss privately, Wikipedia has an e-mail function, which you can use if you register an account. With kind regards, Ginsuloft (talk) 01:19, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

David Crystal
Dear sir or madam,

With all due respect, I feel strongly that you are misinformed.I think you should take a closer look at the life of David Crystal. He saved many people's lives. As you may not know he was a lifeguard at a young age then continued on into the police academy then into the fascinating world of linguistics. He brought me out of a dark place(namely the bottom of the ocean). He is my hero and I have named my child David Crystal; I have named all four of my children after him. Of course this caused my husband to leave, of course you cant have it all but one man did- David Crystal. Thank you and God bless. - David Crystal(formerly known as Marie Jennings) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.100.50.7 (talk) 00:37, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Article Feedback Tool update
Hey Ginsuloft. I'm contacting you because you're involved in the Article Feedback Tool in some way, either as a previous newsletter recipient or as an active user of the system. As you might have heard, a user recently anonymously disabled the feedback tool on 2,000 pages. We were unable to track or prevent this due to the lack of logging feature in AFT5. We're deeply sorry for this, as we know that quite a few users found the software very useful, and were using it on their articles.

We've now re-released the software, with the addition of a logging feature and restrictions on the ability to disable. Obviously, we're not going to automatically re-enable it on each article—we don't want to create a situation where it was enabled by users who have now moved on, and feedback would sit there unattended—but if you're interested in enabling it for your articles, it's pretty simple to do. Just go to the article you want to enable it on, click the "request feedback" link in the toolbox in the sidebar, and AFT5 will be enabled for that article.

Again, we're very sorry about this issue; hopefully it'll be smooth sailing after this :). If you have any questions, just drop them at the talkpage. Thanks! Okeyes (WMF) 21:43, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Reply
"Hello, I'm Ginsuloft. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to The X Factor (Australia series 5) because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Ginsuloft"

--

Yeah sorry, i was testing and i was thinking that purcentage was false for XF Australia serie 5. Really sorry.

But the % are reel, official? I thinks it's odd. Can you confirm it's official please, thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.32.140.46 (talk) 19:03, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

dude never be a fool or in my word fucker I never makes mistake my name is don okay any way sorry for disturbing you for everthing sorry okkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy my bro told you idot but chuk it okay that good for you

Biting
An immediate level three assuming-bad-faith vandalism warning to User talk:Lenster22 for adding "helllloooo mrs. despers class ! ;)" to an article as their first edit? That seems an almost textbook edit test from an excited and well-meaning young editor. --McGeddon (talk) 17:01, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Take a look at the page history. See also WP:CIR. I know what a test edit is, but when test edits become excessive, they're vandalism. Ginsuloft (talk) 17:02, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes, it looks like "Mrs Desper" has mentioned the article to her class and perhaps invited them to edit it - from the back-and-forth "hi Jacob" I assume these are all different people. WP:CIR's "Encourage them to come back in a few years." sounds about right here, but picking the one student who's taken the time to create an account and giving them a flat-out "Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing." warning for a test edit doesn't encourage them to come back at all. --McGeddon (talk) 17:11, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
 * OK, I apologize for my reactance related to protecting the article. The next time I see an entire school class making test edits and messing up an article, I'll let someone else deal with it, so I don't get accused for biting. You seem to be more experienced with cases such as this; if it really is worth it to explain everything to those people before fixing damage, I'm interested to see how you do it. I bet you go to WP:DRN and WP:ANI a lot - keep up the good work. I protect articles from vandals and it is all I can do, but I don't think a fish should be judged for its ability to climb a tree. Not meaning to be defensive - I admit I stuck my nose in something that's not my thing. Ginsuloft (talk) 17:26, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

Vandalism of Article on Vinegar - Beer
Thanks for reverting edit on article of Vinegar. Noticed reversion after initial Vandalism. It appears that IP 98.188.136.19 is part of the pool leased by Cox Communications in Omaha, NB; with an ASN 'AS22773 ASN-CXA-ALL-CCI-22773-RDC - Cox Communications Inc. (registered Nov 20, 2001) ' according to the whois request.

Can Individual IPs be blocked from accessing Wikipedia, and where do they get reported? Yhx. Richard416282 (talk) 01:29, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
 * No problem, and IPs that engage in persistent vandalism can be reported at WP:AIV, where they'll get blocked if they've been sufficiently warned. See blocking policy. Ginsuloft (talk) 01:39, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

Revisions to Adam the Alien
Hi, just wanted you to know that the message you sent to me regarding changes to the Adam The Alien article seems to have been to the wrong person - this computer is connected to a rather large network, though, so maybe that's the cause? (You sent to this IP, right?)

Is there a history of malware causing changes to wikipedia? Should I check my PC? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.225.243.86 (talk) 13:58, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
 * It appears your IP is registered to Danish Network for Research and Education, so you received a message meant for someone else. I wouldn't worry about such a thing. Ginsuloft (talk) 14:30, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

FYI
Trolling removed from your talk page, and 178.128.235.240 put on a final warning. Please report reported straight to WP:AIV if he reoffends after I saw your final warning. Thanks, Mdann52 (talk) 13:04, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks a lot! Ginsuloft (talk) 13:32, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Weird Block Time
I don't know. I gave the block as 10 September, and when I edited the block it gave the expiry as 10 September 2013. However you're right when you say the log said 1970. I'm not sure why that happened but I reblocked to make things clear. NativeForeigner Talk 01:04, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

that name is correct — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.85.178.90 (talk) 20:41, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

RE:Amanda Bynes
Hi there, it was true that amanda said many people were ugly. I don't know how to add references. Could you do that? THANKS!--110.174.41.161 (talk) 21:55, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Add refs by and it will appear as a little number which links to the bottom of the page. Ginsuloft (talk) 21:57, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

Thanks, but I was only fixing the previous error, which said "gaaaaaaay"

Sincerely, Butts — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.147.209.20 (talk) 00:46, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Although everyone is welcome to remove vandalism, please don't do so by replacing it with a different form of vandalism. Ginsuloft (talk) 00:50, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

MC Hammer
I thought everthing I added was pertaining and appropriate to the content provided in the articles of confederation and context. I'm an elite NSA Over Cover agent and I will hunt you down if you don't put it back. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.58.44.129 (talk) 14:59, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

sup bro — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.214.180.130 (talk) 18:32, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

i am correct because my auto mechanics teacher told me so — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.80.18.15 (talk) 21:13, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

nebraska is the best football team ever. thats a fact, jack! so you shouldnt take it down. thanks. bye — Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.234.72.10 (talk) 14:22, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

i made the changes because my names robert gilbertson and i believe its relevant to the page — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.194.78.130 (talk) 14:34, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
 * I noticed. Please read Notability. Ginsuloft (talk) 14:36, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

you made a mistake fool — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.248.224.29 (talk) 16:10, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

First of all how can i trust a person called ginsuloft? Second of all Kate Henderson has a decision in life she needs sorting and you are preventing her from doing so, how do you feel about this?

I think you should take a closer look at the life of kate Henderson. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.71.124.227 (talk) 20:42, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

Trouted
You have been trouted for: I trouted you because i've never trouted anyone before and i want to try and it was exhilirating. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.71.124.227 (talk) 20:48, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

Brian France
The first thing I put was true. A lot of NASCAR fans hate Brian France. I would know, being a NASCAR fan. So don't say it was un-researched. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.98.79.1 (talk) 20:55, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
 * I said it was un-referenced, not un-researched. Original research is not allowed. Also, just because "a lot of NASCAR fans hate him" doesn't make it neutral. Ginsuloft (talk) 20:58, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

but it basicly is an acidic fart
awwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww NO! YEEEEEYY! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.17.12.1 (talk) 22:01, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

reverting my edits
please check your privilege :^) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.176.40.35 (talk • contribs)

Ginsuloft? Is that a real name? I'm just wondering. And are you a robot? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.238.250.184 (talk) 00:11, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The answer to both of your questions is "no". Ginsuloft (talk) 00:16, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

AM! album info
I spoke with Ms. Grace in Chicago last night, and was informed that the new album will be released in January. So, 2014.
 * Yeah, I made a mistake. Noticed it immediately after I reverted. Apologies for that. Ginsuloft (talk) 23:27, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

An apology
I would just like to apologize for the behaviour of my classmates. It would probably be best if we were IP banned from making poor edits, as it is a popular hobby of the students here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.112.177.132 (talk) 19:49, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

Userpage
Hey, want me to semi your userpage? Seems like it's getting vandalized a lot. Mark Arsten (talk) 22:04, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes, that would be appreciated. Thank you! Ginsuloft (talk) 22:08, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
 * ✅ glad to help. Mark Arsten (talk) 22:25, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

14.139.38.11
I noticed that you recently gave 14.139.38.11 a warning about blanking, on Jawed Karim. Here's a policy tip: I'd just given them a level 2 warning, so you should have given them a level 3. (After that it's level 4 which is last warning.) Thanks! 17:22, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the note! I have changed the warning into a level 3 one. Ginsuloft (talk) 17:53, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

That's that
Hello,

You are right that I just made an edit in the 3D printer page. I was astonished how easily I can edit information that people find reliable. Wikipedia is the biggest information source in the biggest library of information, the internet.

Greetings,

Nikki Hes — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.104.22.219 (talk) 18:27, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

Otter Edit
Why do you hate Otters? I'm trying to spread awareness of Otterbox's cruel and terrible practices with their merchandise. The only conclusion I can come to is that you are working for Otterbox and are attempting to hide the truth but I shall not rest until I have spread the word! You cannot put me down! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 38.115.180.194 (talk) 21:11, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

Bad-faith reports
I noticed when you removed a bad-faith report, you gave the user a warning for their edits on the FP page. In this situation, it's better to give them. Jackmcbarn (talk) 01:14, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Hmm, you may be right. Although I don't think it really matters, I'll do that from now on. Ginsuloft (talk) 01:17, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

I made the change to Hyena to demonstrate to a class. We were very impressed by the speed that it was caught! Sorry for the trouble, but thank you! :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.200.242.111 (talk) 15:04, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

no, no, no
there was mistake in the year and i have no time to change it. i will try to do it next week. sorry from sunny stuttgart uni, germany. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.69.140.138 (talk) 13:44, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Replied on your talk page. Ginsuloft (talk) 13:50, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

ohh really!! ty — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.186.76.157 (talk) 00:35, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

i cannot see one thing that is true in that
stop reverting my changes. i am from microsoft and have been working there for 20 years. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.15.73.71 (talk) 13:50, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Then follow the procedure at WP:AFD. Replacing pages with gibberish is not the way we do things here on Wikipedia. Ginsuloft (talk) 13:53, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

Edit request on 23 September 2013
Blank the page

67.160.28.238 (talk) 05:55, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

re: Illuminati
People need to know the truth!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.219.245.1 (talk) 11:37, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

September 2013
Hello, I'm Jeffrd10. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Printing press because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. The reverted edit can be found [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=574175568 here]. Jeffrd10 (talk) 12:50, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Jeff, please be careful which version you're rolling back. Andy Dingley (talk) 13:00, 23 September 2013 (UTC)