User talk:GioIzHawt

Welcome
Hello GioIzHawt and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your contributions, such as the ones to the page Cupboard, do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.


 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ; this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Jab843 (talk) 04:59, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

November 2015
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Cupboard has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:33, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Cupboard was changed by GioIzHawt (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.989029 on 2015-11-17T23:33:09+00:00.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Cupboard. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Melonkelon (talk) 23:38, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

November 2015
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Cupboard has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 04:31, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Cupboard was changed by GioIzHawt (u) (t) ANN scored at 1 on 2015-11-29T04:31:20+00:00.

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Cupboard with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Lor Talk 04:33, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Cupboard with this edit, you may be blocked from editing.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   04:55, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (November 29)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:GioIzHawt/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:GioIzHawt/sandbox Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:SwisterTwister&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:GioIzHawt/sandbox reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister  talk  08:19, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

December 2015
This is your final warning. You may be blocked from editing without further notice the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Pre-Columbian era. Serols (talk) 15:50, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. &mdash; MusikAnimal  talk  15:52, 1 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Hi GioIzHawt, I'm certainly willing to consider unblocking you. Normally in cases like this I'd have just moved at that point, though the sockpuppeting would usually be a straight no, but I'm satisfied with your explanation on that IP you give doesn't have any edits associated with it as far as I can tell. You aren't required to publicly disclose it, but if you are going to put an IP in, you might want to check that's the one you've actually been editing with. In any case,, given the timeline and explanation here, do you have any objection to me unblocking? Nosebagbear (talk) 17:35, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
 * No objection. I am also satisfied with their explanation. The IP given is a Comcast IP, hence the /64 range should all be the same end user. Edits look fine to me (or at least they have constructive intent). &mdash; MusikAnimal  talk  18:44, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
 * I'll add that I support an unblock as well, 5 years is certainly a very long time, and being upfront about the IP editing is a sign of maturity. As long as there isn't any other socking that is hidden, an unblock seems to be right. RickinBaltimore (talk) 17:37, 2 November 2020 (UTC)