User talk:GirlForLife

Welcome
Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;. Four tildes (&#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style

Dep. Garcia 15:21, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

List of cryonicists
How exactly can such a list be "used as disparagement and violation of privacy". The discussion you refer to (the one I found on the talk page) doesn't cite any reasoning based in policy. And when I look at the articles on the listed people I found one who's considered the founding father of the science because of a book he wrote. I can't argue the fact he should be included. Can you explain what you meant? - Mgm|(talk) 12:01, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
 * I was referring to the edit comments that have been made, such as:.
 * The view is explained in detail by Cryobiologist on the Talk:List of cryonicists page. --GirlForLife 21:16, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

Mis-identified vandalism edit?
In the revision history for Cryonics, I see


 * 11:58, 3 November 2010  (→Preservation injury: Minor cleanup for readability and structure.)
 * 18:54, 3 November 2010 ("Minor cleanup for readability and structure" is a conscious effort to cover-up vandalism)

I'm afraid I don't see it - how is that edit not what it proports to be? Thanks! ciphergoth (talk) 10:20, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

Request for article assessment

 * Given your interest in editing Wikipedia article relevant to aging and rejuvenation, would you mind taking a gander at the Wikipedia article for the journal of Rejuvenation Research? I have recently read it and, although I am a biologist who does not study aging, I found the article to be highly biased and written in such a way to portray the journal in a negative light. I was hoping you could take a look and give an honest assessment, as I'm curious if I'm the only user who feels this way.SattvaBodhi (talk) 04:30, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:11, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Conflict of interest policy
Hello, GirlForLife. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the COI guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. --Ronz (talk) 19:40, 28 May 2019 (UTC)