User talk:Girlzrfit

Welcome...

Hello, Girlzrfit, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Help How to write a great article Manual of Style

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and ask your question there.

"Official" websites
Hi. I notice that you've been changing the official websites of some individuals to a set of (your own?) fansites. Please stop. For one thing it's not fair on readers who wish to find the correct websites, and for another the websites you are adding do not meet the Wikipedia policy on external links, which can be found here. Cheers. 4u1e (talk) 02:51, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
 * It seems you haven't read the link I posted for you. The appropriate extract is this "Links normally to be avoided: Links to blogs, personal web pages and most fansites, except those written by a recognized authority. (This exception is meant to be very limited; as a minimum standard, recognized authorities always meet Wikipedia's notability criteria for biographies.)" In other words, the Wikipedia guideline is that pages such as the ones you are adding should not be included.
 * You also need to be aware of something called the three revert rule, in a nutshell: "An editor must not perform more than three reverts (as defined below) on a single page within a 24-hour period.". That means that I won't be removing any more of your links on those articles if you add them today, as I have already done so twice, but it also means that if others do remove them, you mustn't add them again. The purpose of the rule is to get editors to discuss the necessary changes to the article rather than continuously reverting each other: in this case, the guidelines are quite clear, so I hope we can agree that your sites should not be added to Wikipedia pages. Cheers. 4u1e (talk) 16:25, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Craig Gazey. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Anemone Projectors  19:32, 13 May 2010 (UTC)

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. The next time you insert a spam link, as you did to Craig Gazey, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. Anemone Projectors  23:49, 15 May 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Paul burling


The article Paul burling has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners or ask at Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Jminthorne (talk) 21:53, 2 June 2010 (UTC)