User talk:Girmitunited

Speedy deletion of User:Girmitunited
A tag has been placed on User:Girmitunited, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Toddst1 (talk) 06:13, 23 May 2008 (UTC)


 * == Deletion of user page ==

Hello there, I've regretfully had to delete your existing user page because it was simply an advertisement for a (no doubt very useful) website. Wikipedia user pages are for information relating to the editing of the encyclopaedia. While a certain amount of personal information is usually fine, the balance here was wrong. If you intend to be an active Wikipedia editor, by all means re-create your page, but please as a page relating to your editing here and not to your activity on another website. Kim Dent-Brown  (Talk)  06:55, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Hi, I've sent you the text of the deleted page by email, as requested. User pages are meant to improve the editing work of Wikipedia, not stand as independent articles. But they aren't immune from the criteria for speedy deletion that apply to other articles. In other words, if your work can't survive as an independent article, than it doesn't get any kind of 'protected status' on your user page.


 * The website you're working on sounds very interesting and useful: if it meets these criteria and you can cite some independent sources such as newspapers or broadcast media who have featured it, than a sustainable article could be written. Please let me know if you want any help and I'll do what I can to assist. Best wishes - Kim Dent-Brown   (Talk)  07:56, 26 May 2008 (UTC)