User talk:Giteshs78/Archive 2

Speedy deletion nomination of Talk:Saint Dominic in Soriano/GA1


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Talk:Saint Dominic in Soriano/GA1, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. -- Finngall  talk  13:42, 31 July 2017 (UTC)

August 2017
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Saurabh Kumar Shah (IPS), to Wikipedia, as doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- Finngall  talk  03:15, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Saurabh Kumar Shah, from its old location at User:Giteshs78/Saurabh Kumar Shah (IPS). This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. KGirl (Wanna chat?) 12:10, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as you did at Saurabh Kumar Shah (IPS), you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. -- Finngall  talk  13:50, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Saurabh Kumar Shah (August 11)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Saurabh Kumar Shah and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the.
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 17:49, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Saurabh Kumar Shah (August 13)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Saurabh Kumar Shah and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the.
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

David. moreno 72   01:38, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Mahendra Kumar (magistrate)


A tag has been placed on Mahendra Kumar (magistrate), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion,. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discusion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. -- Finngall  talk  04:07, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

August 2017
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you create an inappropriate page, as you did at Mahendra Kumar (magistrate). -- Finngall  talk  04:08, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Mahendra Kumar (magistrate)


A tag has been placed on Mahendra Kumar (magistrate), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion,. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discusion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. -- Finngall  talk  16:33, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

August 2017
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for creating nonsense pages. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Katietalk 18:09, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

Final warning
After just deleting some of your reposts and then looking at your edits, I would have blocked you indefinitely. Since you’re already blocked for one week, I’ll just tell you that upon the expiration of your block, any problematic edits of any kind will subject you to an indefinite block from further editing. This is because as far as I can tell you have not made a single edit that was a positive for the project and your edits are wasting the time of numerous editors; that is: --UTRSBot (talk) 02:54, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Edit warring at Mahendra Kumar (magistrate) to remove the db-g4 tag (when you were not allowed to remove it at all);
 * Not abiding by the consensus at Articles for deletion/DM Mahendra Kumar and then wasting the time of multiple editors by recreating the page at Mahendra Kumar (IAS) after its deletion, and then a bunch of other times at other titles (Draft:Mahendra Kumar (magistrate); User:Giteshs78/sandbox/Mahendra Kumar (magistrate); and three different times at Mahendra Kumar (magistrate))
 * vandalizing User:CommonsDelinker in apparent (utterly futile) retaliation for removal of multiple already deleted image titles that were copyright violations that, in turn, wasted the time of users at the Commons (to others, see Commons:User talk:Giteshs78);
 * wasting more time at Draft:Saurabh Kumar Shah by resubmitting with no changes to address the prior decline (for a draft that does not meet our policies and guidelines);
 * the nonsense, inexplicable tagging of George Chapman (businessman) with a Db-blanked tag, which is pretty transparently an attempt at retaliation at because of his deletion of one of the above recreations;
 * the ridiculous number of pages shown in your deleted edits because you are not making any edits that can stick; and
 * other edits that don’t appear as malevolent, but which are not competent (e.g., ,  and , among many others).--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 21:05, 13 August 2017 (UTC)


 * ( Non-administrator comment ) At the risk of piling on: The reasons for a block go deeper than mere language proficiency. You have shown no understanding of Wikipedia policies and procedures throughout your time here.  This is not a crime for a brand-new user--we were all new once, and these policies can get very complicated.  But over the course of these last few weeks, there has been no evidence that you have learned anything about what Wikipedia is and is not, about the rules, about the principles of collaboration upon which Wikipedia is built, and no understanding of the reasons why your articles get rejected and your other edits get reverted.  And there is no indication that you're even trying to learn these things.  These are the reasons why I agree that you should not be allowed to edit here at this time.  An indefinite block does not necessarily mean a permanent block, but you're going to have to show that you've read the documentation and learned its lessons thoroughly before any reasonable admin will agree to an unblock.  -- Finngall   talk  14:40, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

Please help me
heloo, dear User:KrakatoaKatie. delete my user or talk page please and tell me how to unsubscribe from wikipedia.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Giteshs78 (talk • contribs) date (UTC) 06:40, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
 * If you want your user page deleted, just blank it. I believe you can do that even when blocked. No one is "subscribed" to Wikipedia. Accounts cannot be deleted ever, as your contributions now belong to Wikipedia and you irrevocably listened them to Wikipedia. That licence requires you be attributed for your contributions. John from Idegon (talk) 06:51, 20 August 2017 (UTC)