User talk:Gizziiusa

Problems with upload of File:Breaking bread-200.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Breaking bread-200.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 06:05, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 05:15, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 19:18, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

A brief introduction to how things work here

 * Please sign your posts on talk pages with four tildes ( ~, found next to the 1 key).
 * Always cite a source for any new information, using, containing the name of the source, the author, page number, publisher or web address (if applicable).
 * "Truth" is not the criteria for inclusion, verifiability is.
 * We do not publish original thought nor original research. We're not a blog, we're not here to promote any ideology.
 * Reliable sources typically include: articles from magazines or newspapers (particularly scholarly journals), or books by recognized authors (basically, books by respected publishers). Online versions of these are usually accepted, provided they're held to the same standards.  User generated sources (such as Wikipedia) are to be avoided.  Self-published sources should be avoided except for information by and about the subject that is not self-serving (for example, citing a company's website to establish something like year of establishment).
 * Articles are to be written from a neutral point of view. Wikipedia is not concerned with facts or opinions, it just summarizes reliable sources.  Real scholarship actually does not say what understanding of the world is "true," but only with what there is evidence for.  In the case of science, this evidence must ultimately start with physical evidence.  In the case of other beliefs, this means only reporting what has been written and not taking any stance on doctrine.  Ian.thomson (talk) 03:10, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

For when you want to link to other articles: When you want to link to another article, place the article's name between two brackets, Like this (so, Fnord renders as Fnord). If you want to link to an external website, place it between single brackets,. You can also turn a selection of words into an internal or external link. To turn text into a link " character|and the link text after that character, like so. To turn text into an external link into text, place a space after the link and type away. Be sure to have the correct number of brackets. Ian.thomson (talk) 03:10, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

Re: Genoa Flag discrepancy
Please see my answer to your question in the talk page of Genoa page. --Bbruno (talk) 18:10, 17 November 2011 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or  located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 07:05, 26 November 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 22
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Felt, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Casinos. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:02, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either: This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
 * 1) Add four tildes  ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment; or
 * 2) With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (Insert-signature.png or Signature icon.png) located above the edit window.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 02:24, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

January 2018
Before adding a category to an article, as you did to Drake equation, please make sure that the subject of the article really belongs in the category that you specified according to Wikipedia's categorization guidelines. Categories must also be supported by the article's verifiable content. Categories may be removed if they are deemed incorrect for the subject matter. Thank you. David J Johnson (talk) 22:15, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

hey. i just do stuff on the fly when it comes to wikipedia. im not getting paid for the "work" that i do when i add stuff, etc. seems there are folks like you who seem to take this wikiwork job way too seriously. i added stuff NUMEROUS TIME in various "see also" sections without any backtalk, etc. maybe its folks like you, who make folks like me say "fuck it" i wont do anything here, since im not getting paid. so guess what, from now on, im not going to do a damn thing on wikipedia [all you anal retentive, mightier than thou folks can go fuck yourselves].

as for wikipedia... you can go ahead and DELETE my account. fuck yas.

Disambiguation link notification for April 24
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Comparative mythology, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aruru ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Comparative_mythology check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Comparative_mythology?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Creation of man from clay into Comparative mythology. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g.,. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 19:54, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

April 2019
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Comparative mythology. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.--Biografer (talk) 02:55, 26 April 2019 (UTC)

Also, please provide an edit summary, cheers!--Biografer (talk) 02:56, 26 April 2019 (UTC)

I was the one who originally made the changes to the article, but another user mentioned i didnt do it correctly, so i simply deleted what i contributed. cant see how this is "vandalism" per se since it seems im doing the article a favor b/c it wasnt done correctly to begin with.

you folks really need to make up your minds. do you want ppl to volunteer their respective time/effort to make the article better, or do you not ?? if yous do, then simply correct whatever was wrong, and move on. complaining about how it wasnt done to perfection only invites ppl to simply not waste their time, effort and be stressed about.

if yous dont, obviously thats totally ok too. you or someone else can do it. ta-ta Gizziiusa (talk) 05:15, 26 April 2019 (UTC)gizziiusa

Adding "trapping" to Bushcraft skills
Hello!

Don't think there is any problem with adding "trapping" to the list of skills. I had based the earlier examples from books/resources that were specifically cited elsewhere on the page, so that things were all coherent.

There's plenty enough discussion about trapping on the reddit r/Bushcraft - it can get a bit tricky though as rules/laws/guidelines differ so much from Country to Country, and people don't think to identify their locale.

I've used the paragraph with your addition on r/Bushcraft - so that's as good an "approve" as I can give!

AGingham (talk) 10:05, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 3
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Comparative mythology, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Native Americans.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution (2nd request)
It appears that you copied or moved text from Creation myth to Comparative mythology. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g.,. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. DanCherek (talk) 22:56, 24 July 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Input request @ Talk:Jinn

 * Users are discussing DUE/UNDUE relevance and fringe-ness inputs requested also at Talk:Jinn.
 * Users are discussing DUE/UNDUE relevance and fringe-ness inputs requested also at Talk:Jinn.
 * Also A user has proposed updates for consideration at this sand box for the article Jinn.

As a discussion facilitator fyi a WP:DUE discussion (some aspects may touch WP:Fringe) is at Talk:Jinn stage's WP:RSN and WP:ORN step. After RSN and WP:ORN step, RfC formatting is likely to be discussed at Talk:Jinn in a new sub section.

This intimation / input request is made to you, looking at your previous contribution to the article Comparative mythology or talk page there of. &#32;Bookku   (talk) 04:19, 21 May 2024 (UTC)