User talk:Glabor5/

'''1.	First, what does the article do well? Is there anything from your review that impressed you? Any turn of phrase that described the subject in a clear way?''' The article presents a very well structured content. The content is concise, clear, and easy to read.

'''2.	What changes would you suggest the author apply to the article? Why would those changes be an improvement?''' It wouldn't hurt to add more detail.

3.	What's the most important thing the author could do to improve the article? Add a little detail.

'''4.	Did you notice anything about the article you reviewed that could be applicable to your own article? If so, what?''' Yes, provided more concise content.

'''5.	Are the sections organized well, in a sensible order? Would they make more sense presented some other way (chronologically, for example)? Specifically, does the information they are adding to the article make sense where they are putting it?''' The placement of the content is perfect. The content is very well organized, in which, it is concise and accurate.

'''6.	Is each section's length equal to its importance to the article's subject? Are there sections in the article that seem unnecessary? Is anything off-topic? ''' Yes, it is equal to the importance of the article's subject. There is no unnecessariness or anything off-topic. '''7.	Does the article draw conclusions or try to convince the reader to accept one particular point of view? ''' There are no biases with the content provided, therefore, no convincing the reader to accept a particular point of view. '''8.	Are there any words or phrases that don't feel neutral? For example, "the best idea," "most people," or negative associations, such as "While it's obvious that x, some insist that y."''' Everything feels neutral. '''9.	Are most statements in the article connected to a reliable source, such as textbooks and journal articles? Or do they rely on blogs or self-published authors? ''' There content is linked to two reliable sources, both being scholar articles. '''10.	Are there a lot of statements attributed to one or two sources? If so, it may lead to an unbalanced article, or one that leans too heavily into a single point of view. ''' Both articles are compiled into the concise content provided. '''11.	Are there any unsourced statements in the article, or statements that you can't find stated in the references? Just because there is a source listed, doesn't mean it's presented accurately!''' No, everything in the content is sources from the two articles provided.