User talk:GladUser

Please read WP:NOR - add only content supported by verifiable references to Wikipedia articles. Thanks, Vsmith (talk) 17:02, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

January 2009
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Orange Marlin Talk• Contributions 17:10, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Your edit is not supported by anything, including reliable sources. It is purely WP:SYNTH.   Orange Marlin  Talk• Contributions 17:11, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Your comment is incorrect. Did you look at the cited sources (which are in respected peer-reviewed research journals)?  --GladUser (talk) 17:19, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
 * That's a personal attack. ABout the third one.  Please review WP:VERIFY and WP:RS.  Maybe you'll learn something.  Oh, a writing class will help too.   Orange Marlin  Talk• Contributions 17:21, 3 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Just to say that although you can post to another user's talk page, you really shouldn't delete anything or restore anything they deleted. It can be hard sometimes to understand how different Wikipedia articles are from essays, where you can draw from various sources to come to a conclusion, something you can't do here. dougweller (talk) 18:16, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Orange Marlin Talk• Contributions 17:22, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Disruptive OrangeMarlin
Don't be concerned or intimidated by OrangeMarlin - he is a continuing source of controversy and has himself been under consideration for blocking (for obvious reasons).There is a discussion [|here] that you might want to contribute to.--94.196.122.50 (talk) 18:54, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
 * This is a personal attack. Please refactor.   Orange Marlin  Talk• Contributions 19:13, 3 January 2009 (UTC)