User talk:Gladys Tuffnell

Welcome
Welcome!

One favor: Please give a summary of the edit in the edit summary box. Thanks. (P.S. Any relation to Radolfo Ucha?)

Speedy deletion of Paula Vazquez Picallo
A tag has been placed on Paula Vazquez Picallo requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on |the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Redfarmer (talk) 15:21, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

January 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from pages that you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, then please place  on the page (please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag) and make your case on the page's. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. ''It's ok this time since you did establish notability, but, in the future, please do not remove these templates. Allow an admin to do so.'' Redfarmer (talk) 15:51, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:Caaveiro
A tag has been placed on Template:Caaveiro requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (&lt;noinclude>&#123;{transclusionless}}&lt;/noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 02:04, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Gladys Tuffnell! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created  are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the list:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 15:32, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Paloma Pérez-Lago González -
 * 2) Paula Vázquez Picallo -

May 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although we invite everyone to contribute constructively here, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors, as you did with this edit to User talk:Attilios. You may wish to read the introduction to editing for more information about Wikipedia. Thank you. Falcon8765 (talk) 21:01, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

Protection
It has been protected because it is apparent that you, Colin Gleen, and possibly Michael Peer are cooperating with one another to edit-war over the article. There is even a strong suspicion that the three of you are one editor using multiple accounts. WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Gladys Tuffnell contains a record of the ongoing investigation.&mdash;Kww(talk) 18:21, 28 May 2010 (UTC)


 * You can investigate as much as you can but the fact remains to be one!! AND THIS IS THAT THE “FERROL” ENTRY looks has lost quality and rigour!! And you are, and I’ve seen it before, supporting the amateur and science fiction guy, as opposed to those with the expertise!! Carry on this way and will continue discrediting this project!! YOU SHOULD BE AWARE THAT IN SCHOOLS AND UNIVERSITY IT IS OFTEN THE CASE… MORE AND MORE THAT TEACHERS AND PROFESSORS ADVICE CHILDREN AND YOUNG ADULTS TO AVOID WIKIPAIDIA DUE TO THE LUCK OF ACCADEMIC RIGOUR!! BUT AGAIN LETS penalized and sanction not the criminal but those who have to suffer the criminal acts!! THE TOPSY TURVAY WORLD!! @_@ --Gladys Tuffnell (talk) 18:37, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
 * You have big problems with rules and collaborative works. Your behaviour in mails, comments etc. shows that you are unfit to collaborate to Wikipedia respecting its rules. Further, your English is childish, you have no idea of how a serious encyclopedia is written, you have nothing Wikipedia needs. So take a rest and do something else. --&#39;&#39;&#39;Attilios&#39;&#39;&#39; (talk) 19:29, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

Block Extension
Creating User:Catherine Oxenberg resulted in your block getting extended to one month.&mdash;Kww(talk) 14:45, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for returning to Ferrol, Spain both with IP socks and your named account to continue the edit war.. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. &mdash;Kww(talk) 11:24, 3 July 2010 (UTC)