User talk:Gladys j cortez/Archive2

April 2008
In the interest of neatness, I have archived my talk page through this point.Gladys J Cortez 20:25, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

OK, I'm not a stalker, I promise, but...
I was reading your userpage, and clicked on your "/" subpages, and noticed that you, like me, are a "recovering junior high teacher". I taught middle school, (grade 6, all subjects, plus grade 8 math) for several years. It's been 6 years since I "moved on", but still, I get shivers thinking about the little demons students. Nothing else to say really, other than I'm glad you're in my watchlist "Gladys." Cheers,  Keeper   |   76   |   Disclaimer  20:33, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

Curious George (TV series)
Hi, Gladys. Looks like the same guy. He's already had a last warning on his other IP address but I've left another on this one. If necessary, the articles he targets can be semi-protected since he doesn't seem to use an account. Please keep me in touch. Regards -- Rodhullandemu  (Talk) 01:37, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Not awesome, just insomniac. -- Rodhullandemu  (Talk) 01:38, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Barney's Magical Musical Adventure
I find this rather funny. It appears that the person making the edits has Wikipedia mixed up with the shows producers. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 07:33, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Dragon Tales
Hey, got your message. Ill place a warning on his page, thought i did, talk laterzs thanks Ottawa4ever (talk) 00:08, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

Ilovecallie
It's a sock of, apparently. Not sure of that rings any bells. Sarcasticidealist (talk) 22:59, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

A little gift

 * :) Just a little sign or 'preciation. Rudget   (Help?) 18:23, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

Arthur
I wasn't sure about that one myself, but thought it was justified because it doesn't describe the product at all and someone might wonder exactly what the Zoo Pals are. If you want me to revert I can.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 23:39, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
 * It was a good idea to revert in retrospect, as we don't even have a paper plates article (it RD's to plate), so they'd do better highlighting and Googling than following the link in this case. Eh...  Nate  • ( chatter ) 05:17, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

Thomas & Friends
Hey don't worry about it. I'm a regular on Guild Wars Wiki at so I know how to wiki somewhat, I just didn't feel the need to make an account here. I have gotten my 2 year old son into Thomas (Because his name is the same and my wife....) But anyway, not a big deal, don't sweat it. I was just trying to get rid of rubbish. Sorry I wasn't very concise. 209.159.197.36 (talk) 04:24, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

On this edit summary
You know, I often find myself outraged by butter. Newts also make me angry. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 21:26, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Danieljuravsky
Thanks for the heads up. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 19:06, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

DUCK-y
I just saw your post on my talk - don't know how I missed it. I was bonkers all weekend, got back today with way too much going on. Still need assistance? Keeper  |   76   |   Disclaimer  17:40, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure why butter makes someone furious....who added that? Anywho, new users show up all the time that are amazingly capable editors.  Many times, its as the result of utilizing our keen right to vanish feature.  We're allowed to leave, and come back.  However, only the ones that are serious about wanting to "disappear" come back as n00bs, not as ANI and RFA contributors.  Time will tell, you're right, no need to fish.  Usually, the editor jumps out of the water and into the boat him/herself without our assistance. Cheers,  Keeper   |   76   |   Disclaimer  18:50, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Ok, but I still don't get the butter joke. What does butter have to do with atrocity? And I was over-involved in that whole prima-facist thing (read his talkpage).  Did I make the grammar guffaw?   :) Keeper   |   76   |   Disclaimer  21:26, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Ah, so only an analogy. Whew, I thought someone somewhere had actually branded a type of butter as "atrocity".  (Hey, if Smucker can be the name of a jelly, why not "Cholesterol free, I can't believe it's not Atrocity" ?)  And I wanna know why I can make Ĺ Ú Ž Б Ч ʝ d̪ Ć and ď, but not "backwards r".  I'm going to the foundation with this.  What an atrocity (rich, creamy atrocity).... Keeper   |   76   |   Disclaimer  21:39, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Ah! Nevermind! I can Ya (Cyrillic) do it! Я Я Я Я Я Я Я Я Я yay! Butter avoided....this all reminds me of your relabelled Wiki-stalking...mmmm.mmmmm.mmmm...good ... Keeper  |   76   |   Disclaimer  21:42, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Gsnguy is like a zombie...
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Mrschimpf&diff=216923883&oldid=216591396 He Just. Won't. Die.] Got the sock tag on this IP and reverted Elmo's World and Monsterpiece Theater cruft from him. I guess the school year's over so IUP can't stop him anymore.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 21:14, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

HellofaDeal
Yup, it's him...he 'f-ing passworded' Netsnipe...not such a good idea to do to an admin who blocked him straightaway. His brain must be cottage cheese, which annoys me more than butter :-P.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 22:10, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

Teletubbies Funding
My source for the funding of Teletubbies is from Wayback Machine's caches. There are actually a few links so here is a link with all the links to the old caches. http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.pbs.org/teletubbies —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gabrielboros100 (talk • contribs) 19:42, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

User:TheInvisibleMachine11
I don't see a need for a checkuser at this time -- the sockpuppetry is pretty obvious, and there appears to be only this new account (I checked, and there's no Machine12 yet). NawlinWiki (talk) 19:32, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Did you see he tried to copy your entire userpage into his? What a loon; I got passworded by 164.156.231.55; applied the sock tag to him. Looks like he's probably at the local Job Service office creating havoc on their computers or some other government place (JMO).  Nate  • ( chatter ) 20:37, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Actually Essjay was the first one to welcome me to the site and post to my talk page, heh. Such an irony.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 06:20, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

More Funding Vandalizers
There is a user who keeps adding Kellogg's Rice Krispies and Chuck E. Cheese's as funders to The Magic School Bus, which they are not. I have deleted the false information at least twice, but the user keeps on putting it back in the article. His username is 71.130.199.34. I am not trying to bug you, but since you seem to be good at deleting false funding information, maybe you could do something about it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gabrielboros100 (talk • contribs) 17:47, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

99.162.239.44
You could be right. Interesting, because I always thought the account was a variation on Long term abuse but the IP would indicate that it's not. Cheers. There used to be several named accounts vandalising Barney, etc. but they all got blocked. They were similiar to Daniel Juravsky in that they never responded to any comments, ever. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 10:16, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

Re: talk page reverts
Gladys, I don't see anything controversial about reverting edits of that sort or of the sort I just reverted myself. The anon editor in question (assuming it's all the same person, which seems likely but can't really be known) is not making good faith contributions to a discussion intended to improve the article. Granted, discussions may often veer away from that goal, and it would be pretty bad form to reflexively revert any comment based on a strict interpretation of talk-page guidelines...but this particular situation doesn't seem like it falls in that grey area. That's my read on it, anyhow. Dppowell (talk) 21:00, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

Thank you
Dear Gladys,

Thank you for the kindness you have shown to me in the worst time of my life. People like you make me see that we at Wikipedia are more than just simple anonymous contributers. When need be, we are a family. I will never forget your generosity of spirit. Jeffpw (talk) 16:39, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your note of concern. While I would have reacted as Aleta did in her position, I am ashamed and embarrassed that so many know I am not made of granite, as I like to come across. I promise you I would never do anything which would make Isaac unhappy. Jeffpw (talk) 07:42, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

Kievie26
Hi, I saw your AN/I thread. It looks to me like this guy could be yet another of User:Lyle123's accounts; see. This keeps coming up (and up and up and up...) - and seems to match the profile: a username with letters and numbers and a pattern of subtle and long-undetected vandalism/hoaxes to TV-related articles. I can't believe more people don't know about this guy. Vashti (talk) 10:55, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

Re: Teletubbies
Re your message: Thanks for the explanation on why the IP was targetting Teletubbies. I thought it was just a normal target of silly vandalism like other popular kid things seem to be, but I see now that it is more extensive than that. I blocked the IP after all of the reverts, but looking at the talk history, I suspect he will be back in a couple of weeks. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 03:15, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

Barney friend
Could well be the same person as Danieljuravsky. I'm not sure about the ref desks because I never saw that one. Their edits are annoying. I'm not really sure if there is enough for a RFCU or it would just be a fishing trip. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 14:11, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

RE: July 2008
No, I will not stop making disruptive edits as I did to Barney & Friends, and I will not be blocked from editing Wikipedia.--Spobmur (talk) 16:24, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
 * And neither will he be winning a prize for clairvoyance today :) --Tagishsimon (talk) 22:19, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

Your comments about my comments about the Wishbone (TV series) reverts.
Hey, Gladys, I'm just stopping by to let you know that I got your message on my talk page. I'm replying here because I'm not sure if you would see a reply I post on my talk page. It could very well be I'm assuming way too much good faith on the part of this user. I've been on all four ends of the "good faith spectrum." That is, I have assumed too much good faith in the past, and I have also not assumed enough good faith as well. Likewise, I've had people that have assumed too much good faith on my part, and have also assumed too little good faith on my part. I'm still attempting to find a middle ground. However, the last time I didn't use "soft soap" in making corrective comments towards an editor, I was chastised right back for correcting an incorrect point that in the other editor's opinion did not need to be corrected. So, whenever I have felt the need to correct an editor since that time, I find that the soft approach works best. If that means I assume too much good faith, then I guess it's time to revamp the procedure I use when making corrections. I myself can't stand vandals either and have very little use or tolerance for them. So, in general, I do try to fix the problem first and explain later, and in general, I have been a lot harsher in corrective comments. But this time, I felt a need to tone it down just a bit because of the last experience I had correcting someone. That time, I rather harshly suggested that if all they were doing was vandalizing pages that they should take it somewhere else where it would be tolerated. Surprisingly enough, it didn't go over very well. Though I was following WP policy, I got a terse message in response to the effect that if I wanted a page to be run MY way, I should start my own online encyclopedia, and that way it could say whatever I wanted it to say. It has been my experience here at WP that some editors get their noses out of joint if soft soap is not used in corrective patterns. It has also been my experience that even vandals deserve soft soap. For even if we ASSUME that the edits were not in good faith, there's still the outside chance that they were. And if they were, in that case, those not using soft soap tend to look pretty silly. Who doesn't look silly with egg on their face? I agree with you 100% that this guy does need the kind of strong dose of what you prescribed, but in order to get it, he'll have to go to another pharmacist that can stomach that kind of thing. As for me myself, I would 100 times prefer assuming too much good faith over not assuming enough good faith. I'm explaining all this to you so that you understand what my mind frame was when I made that comment. I'll take your comment under advisement and try to strike a better balance between assuming too much good faith and not assuming enough good faith. In the meantime, for further clarification of what I tried to say here, you can either shoot me a message on my talk page (as I don't habitually check other users' talk pages) or leave a comment for me on the Talk:Wishbone (TV series) page under the appropriate section. Thanks for the advice, thanks for listening, and I hope you understood what I was trying to say. Best wishes. --Jgstokes-We can disagree without being disagreeable (talk) 22:20, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

Yo Gabba Gabba
Why did you revert my properly-sourced Yo Gabba Gabba edit? I'm assuming that it was a good-faith error, yes? &mdash;  X   S   G   00:28, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Hey! Thanks for the explanation.  And thanks for keeping your eye out on things... if I had done what you thought I did, I would hope my edit would be reverted.  :) &mdash;   X   S   G   23:26, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

It looks like you weren't notified
But Sprout Sharing Show was nominated for deletion a few days ago. Apologies to the nominator if I missed you notifying Gjc (the article re-creator) upon my quick scan of this talkpage. Keeper   76  21:08, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

We Have A Problem...
It looks like the Super Why! article is regularly being vandalized. Do you think it's a good idea tro get semi-protection for this page because of this? NoseNuggets (talk) 10:56 AM US EDT Aug 14 2008

I have asked the supervisors to semi-protect the Super Why pages in light of the continuing "vandalism" and redos from non-registered users and that only registered users be allowed to edit this page. Please send a note to said supers to confirm my comments. NoseNuggets (talk) 5:56 PM US EDT Sept 22 2008


 * BTW, new episodes of Super Why will air the week of September 1. I found them in a Google search of a list of Super Why! episodes on KET and Alabama Public Broadcasting. NoseNuggets (talk) 12:50 PM Aug 14 2008.

WP:AN or AN/I == (moved from userpage--no refactoring, no offense meant) ==

Leaving half the conversation there is an invitation to arguing, restoration, whatnot. Better to remove anything. Trash is not really directed at you personally, but the whole back-forth sniping - which is a terribly way to greet someone new. All of it was bitey - some far more so than others, but still ... unprofessional. The situation is now very well resolved and no egg exists on our face. I'm sorry if I offended you, this was not my intent. Realistically, there are already ~1000 middle school students running amok through Wikipedia with little to no guidance, and unless they actually misbehave, nothing's going to be done about them anyways. Offering guidance to their co-ordinator would've been a positive step. Telling off someone looking for help was not a positive step. Wily D 02:42, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

Bella signora


Love Giano (talk) 21:05, 28 September 2008 (UTC)