User talk:GlassLogic

December 2009
Your account has been blocked from editing Wikipedia because it appears to be mainly intended or used for publicity and/or promotional purposes. Please read the following carefully.

Your account's edits and/or username indicate that it is being used on behalf of a company, group, or organization for purposes of promotion and/or publicity. You have violated one or more of our rules, including rules against adding inappropriate external links, posting advertisements, using Wikipedia for promotion, and editing inappropriately with a conflict of interest. This kind of activity is considered spamming and is forbidden by Wikipedia's policies. Although Wikipedia has a great many articles on companies, groups, and organizations, it is considered inappropriate for such groups to use Wikipedia to write about themselves. In addition, usernames like yours are disallowed under our username policy.
 * Why can't I edit Wikipedia?

Probably not. See FAQ/Organization for a helpful list of frequently asked questions by people in your position. See Conflict of interest for the kinds of limitations you would have to obey if you did want to continue editing about your company, group, or organization. If this does not fit in with your goals here, you will not be allowed to edit again. Consider using one of the many websites that allow this instead.
 * Am I allowed to make these edits if I change my username?

You are still welcome to write about something other than your company or organization. If you do intend to make useful contributions on some other topic, you must convince a Wikipedia administrator that you mean it. To that end, please do the following:
 * What can I do now?


 * Add the text below this message box.
 * Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:Listusers to search for available usernames.  Your new username will need to meet our username policy.
 * Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

See also Appealing a block for more information. Beeblebrox (talk) 18:51, 24 December 2009 (UTC)


 * I've left word with the administrator who blocked you. Your request is more than reasonable and I happen to know that the admin is just as reasonable.  Hang tight and keep an eye on this page.  Merry Christmas and thanks for your wishes to contribute.  --PMDrive1061 (talk) 22:01, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

Childcustodydivorcefamilylawyer (talk) 21:08, 27 December 2009 (UTC)Childcustodydivorcefamilylawyer
 * Please note to administrator that the links on this article are now to official court Web sites, and that the notability standards should be met my that. Specifically I am referring to the links in the second section, I believe to the Michigan Supreme Court's order grannting leave to appeal, and I think the decision from the lower appellate court. These links were burried deep in the Court's web site, and I was previouly unaaware of their existence. If I would have previously found those links, I would not have linked to the same documents to a private web site. Thanks to whomever found those documents. It seems now that all the information is totally verifiable based on documents posted to government web sites.

Welcome!

Hello, GlassLogic, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Chillum (Need help? Ask me) 21:17, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

Nomination of Foster v. Wolkowitz for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Foster v. Wolkowitz is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Foster v. Wolkowitz until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. AleatoryPonderings (???) (!!!) 03:20, 21 October 2021 (UTC)