User talk:Glastonbury27

Go ahead, make my day.

Speedy deletion nomination of Against the Silence
A tag has been placed on Against the Silence requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Eeekster (talk) 02:46, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

October 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Against the Silence, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 02:54, 20 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Based on your response, the warning message re Andy Zipf has been removed. It appears that the message was left in error and I hope you will accept my apologies for my eror. Alansohn (talk) 12:01, 22 October 2009 (UTC)