User talk:Gleamian2

David Eddings
I'm not familiar with this page.— Vchimpanzee  •  talk  •  contributions  •  17:55, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
 * I looked at the past 500 edits by User:Vchimpanzee and confirmed that the article in question, while unlikely to have been edited by them in the manner which you imply, was in fact not edited by them at all.--Quisqualis (talk) 21:43, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

Sorry. My mistake. Chill out.
 * Guess you meant User:Deacon Vorbis?--Quisqualis (talk) 23:16, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

Yessir

February 2020
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon &bull; videos) 22:25, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Talk:David Eddings are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines, not for general discussion about the topic or unrelated topics, or statements based on your thoughts or feelings. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. &#8211; MJL &thinsp;‐Talk‐☖ 23:18, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon &bull; videos) 01:04, 25 February 2020 (UTC)

May 2021
Hello, I'm HeartGlow30797. I noticed that in this edit to David Eddings, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.  Heart  (talk) 03:05, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that.   • | melecie |   t  03:09, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Leigh Eddings, you may be blocked from editing.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   03:21, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you blank out or remove content from Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Leigh Eddings.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   03:22, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 36 hours to prevent further disruptive removal of material. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   03:24, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

June 2021: Please stop removing sourced content from articles
'''Your repeated unexplained removal of content from articles about the Eddingses is disruptive. You have been warned countless times and continue to ignore the warnings, thereby risking the loss of access to your Wikipedia account.''' You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. --Quisqualis (talk) 21:09, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

June 2021
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Widr (talk) 21:46, 4 June 2021 (UTC)