User talk:Gleeanon409/Archive 1

Overlinking
Please see WP:OVERLINK- we don't need a page filled with links when they are already linked earlier in the article. Thank you. Magitroopa (talk) 03:16, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
 * I’m afraid that hardline interpretation is not supported. The manual of style also says to apply common sense. We can open a RfC to get more eyes on this if you wish. Gleeanon409 (talk) 03:31, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Your interpretation is incorrect, Gleeanon409. Over linking can be seen as disruptive.  An RfC would be the next step but a waste of time, more than likely.  Tide  rolls  20:08, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
 * There is exceptions to “the rule”, in charts, for instance, the source of this disagreement. Even if we went by a strict rule, which we don’t need to for this case, that editor was insistent that the wiki link could only be in one place. This is counter-intuitive when there is a chart of the top finalists, likely where most readers would consult at this point. Gleeanon409 (talk) 06:36, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
 * I was addressing your description of "hardline interpretation" to the poster's statement "we don't need a page filled with links when they are already linked earlier".  Tide  rolls  12:30, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
 * No problem. Gleeanon409 (talk) 13:20, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 20
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
 * Drag Queen Story Hour ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Drag_Queen_Story_Hour check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Drag_Queen_Story_Hour?client=notify fix with Dab solver])
 * added a link pointing to The Advocate
 * RuPaul's DragCon NYC ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/RuPaul%27s_DragCon_NYC check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/RuPaul%27s_DragCon_NYC?client=notify fix with Dab solver])
 * added a link pointing to The Advocate

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:47, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. ·Carn !? 08:16, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. –Darkwind (talk) 22:53, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
 * I stopped editing there a day ago so they could do whatever they wanted. I accept the punishment. Gleeanon409 (talk) 23:32, 21 September 2019 (UTC)