User talk:Glehany

Proposed deletion of Quadrinational


The article Quadrinational has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * WP:NEO, WP:NAD and possibly WP:HOAX. None of the 3 refs work for me.  A Google search doesn't show up much.  This could be replaced by a redirect to Devolution in the United Kingdom or a soft redirect to Wiktionary (although that doesn't currently have an entry for this word).

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DexDor (talk) 19:56, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Quadrinational for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Quadrinational is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Quadrinational until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DexDor (talk) 20:21, 29 April 2014 (UTC)