User talk:Glen.leaf

Top 100 Downloaded Singles from iTunes (2006)
I've added the "prod" template to the article Top 100 Downloaded Singles from iTunes (2006), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at Talk:Top 100 Downloaded Singles from iTunes (2006). You may remove the deletion notice, and the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. HereToHelp 15:18, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Rather then delete the article, I made some suggestions on its talk page.--HereToHelp 20:26, 24 December 2006 (UTC)

But I have deleted it. Please see WP:NOT. A page which consists of little more than links to other pages is an "indiscriminate collection of information". User:Zoe|(talk) 23:38, 24 December 2006 (UTC)

This is not little more than a page which consists of links to other pages. This is a factual list of the most purchased singles from a service that accounts for 80% of the world's downloaded music sales. The fact that the title and artist names link is irrelevant.

You have recently recreated or reposted material which previously was deleted in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policies. Please do not recreate this article without prior approval from an administrator or you may be blocked from editing. We ask that you respect what Wikipedia is not. If you disagree with the article's deletion, you may seek an independent deletion review.