User talk:Glen/Archive4

Re: Adminship
No, I'm not ignoring you--I promise! Anyway, I've looked over your contribs, and I have to say that you're quite a balanced and experienced editor with excellent use of edit summaries! (Stats copied below). My experiences interacting with you have always been quite positive, and I think you're a pretty level-headed, friendly guy. So in short, yes, I think now would be a good time for you to give it a try, and, while everyone certainly has faults, I can't find many here. All of that said, I will give you my very strong support (or hell, I might even nominate you =D) under one condition: Get rid of that damned "You have new messages" thing on your talk page!!!! Other than that, you have my full support. AmiDaniel (talk) 08:24, 11 June 2006 (UTC)

Statistics for: Stollery - Total: 4724 - Main: 1738 Talk: 196 User: 532 User talk: 1811 Wikipedia: 301 Wikipedia talk: 17 Image: 57 Image talk: 1 Template: 33 Template talk: 6 Category: 32 --- Total edits: 4724 Minor edits: 1714 Edits with edit summary: 4597 Edits with manual edit summary: 4374 Percent minor edits: 36.28% * Percent edit summary use: 97.31% * Percent manual edit summary use: 92.59% * --- ---
 * - percentages are rounded down to the nearest hundredth.


 * Never thought you were ignoring me for a second. Thank you for your comments! Am a wee bit disappointed my edit summary usage wasn't 100% tho! (must be from when I first opened the account lol) But I am a little confused,m what "you have new messages thing"? [[Image:Face-wink.svg|25px]]
 * Woa ... where'd your new messages thing go? From looking at the history, it wasn't there when I left that message, so now I'm rather embarassed. I know exactly where you're coming from with the whole edit summary thing ... I swear I never forget to leave edit summaries, but in my early days ... grrr... Anyway, good luck, and I'll see if I have the time to nominate you ;). AmiDaniel (talk) 09:52, 11 June 2006 (UTC)

Cool
Just curious...Nice Work!

 Mr. Ba  ge  l   leave me one  peteg913  14:39, 11 June 2006 (UTC)

fairusage images can't be used in templates like Template:ScientologySeries
Please see the discussion at Media copyright questions. Fair use criteria, point 9 says "Fair use images should only' be used in the article namespace." --Rob 17:03, 11 June 2006 (UTC)

Signpost updated for June 12th.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.

Message delivered by Ralbot 01:36, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

Ronnie Coleman
Thanks a ton for helping me in the Ronnie Coleman edit war of '06. That was a real pain to police by myself, and thankfully, it's semi-protected now. -- Omicronpersei8 00:52, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
 * No problem! :) - Glen Stoll e ry 16:03, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

Re: VandalProof application
Ok, that's fine. :-) I thought I had made 250 edits, but I guess I just misunderstood something or other.  Thanks for letting me apply though! I love to help Wikipedia! Lbr123 07:10, 17 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Thanks. You can see your edit count here. Bear in mind, our minimum is 250 mainspace edits (you currently have just under 150) Thanks again - Glen Stoll e ry 07:24, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

NASA
That might be the dumbest thing I've ever heard. -James Howard (talk/web) 19:29, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

Please delete dholbajja ASAP
Dholbajja is an offensive/derogatory word and is not at all needed here. Please get it deleted fast just like words like domkatar have been deleted. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 59.94.41.72 (talk • contribs) 18 June 2006.


 * See Articles for deletion/Dholbajja - I have certainly tried! - Glen Stoll e ry 12:13, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

Thank you, Glen!!

Please get this user blocked please Glen: User:Holywarrior. This user is a vandal and he cleverly slanders certain upper castes of India. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 59.94.43.188 (talk • contribs) 20 June 2006.

Two things
Hi Glen. Two things: Best regards. ×Meegs 12:29, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
 * 1) I noticed your posts on User talk:Bizkit 21 2002 regarding the images of magazine covers, and also that you have uploaded a number of them yourself. Please be aware our fair use policy does not allow the use of magazine covers unless they are part of critical commentary about the magazine itself; that is, they can not be used simply for identification of the person on the cover.
 * 2) When I came here, I saw that you're a VandalProof moderator. I was considering listing User:CynicalMe as an abuser earlier today, decided instead to continue pointing-out the problems and requesting changes in their editing pattern.  About half of their VP edits are inappropriate, even after complaints yesterday, but the user is well-intentioned and may eventually improve.  I don't know how tight you guys keep the reins on the tool, though, so if you could take a quick look at my and others' posts on User talk:CynicalMe from the 16th, 17th, and 18th UTC, I'd appreciate it.


 * Thanks for the double heads up re the above. My word, now I am aware it seems there are prob tens of thousands of articles that breach fair use copyright! What is the best course of action to your mind? Is it serious enough that I should act when happening upon each one or could the interpretation of the law be read in more than one way? Regardless thank you for letting me know. Re Cynicalme, yes you def have a point. I have made our position clear (yet fairly I believe) on his talk page - I "gulp" (is "doubt" the word I'm best to use here?) we will have probs now, but will keep a close eye (let me know of course if you see more use in this manner). I thank you again, - Glen Stoll e ry 13:24, 18 June 2006 (UTC)


 * It is a huge problem, especially under the tag.  When you come across a copyrighted image that is outside of fair use, there are lots of options: bring it to WP:CP, bring it to WP:PUI, tag it, tag it , or simply remove it from the article with an educational edit summary and tag it . There's also Fair use disputed, though the template, by itself, doesn't do anything but start a conversation.  Depending on the case, some of these processes can be more appropriate than others.  For magazine covers, which have been debated to death, orphaning is pretty reasonable.


 * Thanks for providing another voice on the VandalProof matter. I'm just curious, does inclusion on the list User talk:AmiDaniel/VandalProof itself enable a user to use VP, as AutoWikiBrowser/CheckPage does for AWB, or is the authentication done somewhere else?  (replying here alone is ok) Take care. ×Meegs 14:16, 18 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Wow, re Fair use: learn something new everyday... Re: VP, inclusion on that list, or more specifically the one at User:AmiDaniel/Welcome to VandalProof is all that's required as the software checks that page when logging in. Anyone who edits those pages will be reverted almost immediately as the mods software reverts automatically. Shed some light? :) - Glen Stoll e ry 14:45, 18 June 2006 (UTC) PS: Just approving you for use now if ya wanna have a snoop?


 * Would that I could; I don't have Windows :( ...wait, I got that wrong...  :) ...there we go! ×Meegs 15:04, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

Edit counter
No, I'm using FF, but I mistakenly thought the edit count links on the VF page would be using an edit counter I had seen on the mediawiki that had that problem, so I'm sure yours works fine. Sorry about that. Michael WhiteT&middot;C 14:01, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

Definitely not balanced
Hiya, mate! Glad you are watching discussions on the ol' wiki. I intend to keep an eye on both Terryeo and Tony Sidaway, each for different reasons. We will stay in touch.--Fahrenheit451 03:02, 19 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Or maybe it is Fair 'n' Balanced and we're now owned by Fox?! lol. Nah, something not right there. I just added the diffs to my post for crystal clarity, and anytime :) - Glen Stoll e ry 03:05, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

I don't know of any policy against a watch list per se. It may be politically incorrect, however. I know that you are no stranger to that.--Fahrenheit451 22:05, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

Username change
As you requested, your username has now been changed from Stollery to GIen. If you haven't done it already, please remember to move your user page and your talk page. Redux 03:23, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Thank you! - Gl e n 04:28, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

Creatine
Thought you'd get a kick out of another spammer over on the Talk:Creatine page. He's moved on to personally attacking me because I removed the links and unverifiable statements about his own company. He's also questioning your inclusion of Phosphagen and my Cell-Tech sentence. Your opinion could help diffuse the situation. I've been pretty civil so far, citing the policies, but perhaps another warning might be in order and he seems to think I'm out to get him. Cheers. Yankees76 13:41, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

RfA thanks!
--Pilot| guy 22:53, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

Barnstar.
Thanks you for awarding me barn-star. Much appreciated. I have never gotten Barn-Star in wikipedia. Anyways, Kepp doing good work. Cheers.!!! *~Daniel~* 23:26, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

Signpost updated for June 19th.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.

Message delivered by Ralbot 23:31, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

Your green E
User:Tony Sidaway/No refactor might come in handy. - brenneman  color="000000" title="Admin actions">{L} 01:19, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

Thanks
For adding the new username to vandalproof. Viridae 04:31, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

Vandalproof problem
Vandalproof seems to have developped a problem - every single recent change I look at comes up with a message "Admin has recieved no vandalism warnings" (where you would normally see user warnings) and all the page titles are followed by a question mark (in the RC changes part on the left hand side) Here is a screen dump of the problem: click. As you can see, the problem applies to both logged in an ip users... Any ideas? Viridae 04:49, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
 * I just had a look atlogin page more closely and relaised that the problem is probobly known. If the one described is the same as what I am describing - don't worry about it. Viridae 05:04, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

MY 5000TH EDIT!!!!
Must be getting kinda good at this by now huh? :) - Gl e n 09:31, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

Magazine covers
Hey glen,

I got a message from someone saying not to add covers for people's pictures anymore. View my talk page for the details. I saw you did it. How can you do it and I can't? Please try to help/fix the situation.

Later. Bizkit 21 2002 13:13, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

The Ronnie Coleman Vandal is Back
He's using sockpuppets too, I've placed sockpuppet tags on his pages as a start. Just a heads up. Yankees76 03:32, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

Nice job - it looks like he made quite a few user profiles. I wish I had that much spare time! Cheers Yankees76 04:47, 21 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Is that the lot from the last couple days that you know of (apart from IPs)? Thanks again - Glen 04:55, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

Two more - one is back today, the other will be once Cartty is banned.


 * Cartty
 * Havedisk

Yankees76 20:50, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

Here's the complete list so far: 

He's been there on and off all day - also check the entry for buttocks too, he's there as well. Such a waste of time. Yankees76 21:58, 21 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Glen, an admin has removed the semi-protection on the page and the vandals have returned. See Talk:Ronnie_Coleman for the current dicussion with Brian Kendig on this subject. Yankees76 02:54, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

Banned User Templates
Hey thanks, that means a lot to me to hear that! :) Màglor 05:16, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

Tony Sidaway RfC
Glen, you can address Sidaway's sig editing habit here: Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_comment/Tony_Sidaway_3 --Fahrenheit451 01:38, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

Stco23
Thank you for the spelling change. I did not know I misspelled Vandalism on my user page. Thank you.--Stco23 03:49, 24 June 2006 (UTC)

VandalProof Problem
Since my username was changed, I can't seem to log in to VandalProof, can you please check everything is set up correctly, btw - I noticed VandalKilla was still on the list. Thanks TehKewl1 04:34, 24 June 2006 (UTC)

Glen are you okay?
Glen, Hate to be a bother...but anxiety and fear at times get the best of even a die-hard Scientomogist, as myself. I just want to know that you are doing fine, and the nasty Scientologists haven't come to get you...I mean, I would hate to infiltrate every Scientology "Church" screaming,"WHAT HAVE YOU DONE WITH GLEN?" But really, I just want to know if you're okay. Take it easy, and know that you are often and highly thought of :) All your fans miss ya ;) Francie32@hotmail.com

Francie32
Ok, now I have an account here as well. Thanks Glen, and I tried to download vandal proof, and I am not sure if I did it correctly...I'm just a wog...Anyways..Cheers, hope you are well..I have stared at my computer quite long enough for one day. Hope to talk with you soon. Francie32 21:50, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

Signpost updated for June 26th.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.

Message delivered by Ralbot 23:00, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

Urgent
Glen, Sorry to distrub you, I just learned that some email I sent today came from another user's account, so please when reading and responding to any email from me, do NOT HIT REPLY, please address comments to FRANCIE32@hotmail.com, this is really quite serious if you read them you will understand, and I will tell you that I sent a Cc..to Francie32 in the subject, but wasn't getting a response, I am very unfamiliar with Miscrosoft Outlook, and accidentally sent you sensitive information, under someone else's account. If you understand please let me know ASAP, to ensure that someone else does not get my message. thanks Francie32@hotmail.com

Excellent!
Thanks for your change of heart! I was going to talk to you after the original message you gave me, asking what counter you were using... Some say this, some say the other. Interiots JS counter says 380+ whereas another says <270. Anyway, it all worked out in the end. Thanks for your input. Celardore 01:25, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Hello again! I installed VandalProof 1.2, but I cannot log in at all. I'm sure it's something I'm "not doing right" but any suggestions are welcome!  The app says its "Retrieving user list.  Please wait..."
 * In the main panel of VP it doesn't give me any clues - just a "The page cannot be displayed" message.
 * Tips would be ever so helpful! It's probably something obvious, thanks for all your help.  Celardore 01:59, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

Hello again, I've various things to get VandalProof to work. I cleared my mononook.js, which only had Lupins popup script in it. I switched to IE and logged in to WP. I don't know what to do next. It still just says "Retrieving user list. Please wait..." Would it be worth creating a new account and registering that for VandalProof? Thanks. Celardore 13:12, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

Hello yet again! Any suggestions for getting VP to work are welcome, as I have yet to even see what it can do. I cleared my cookies in IE, lowered the privacy settings, removed my monobook.js stuff, removed the firewall on my router, un&reinstalled VP... No joy =( If you're stuck for ideas I'll probably head over to the VP bugs page.  Thanks for your help. CelardoreTalk 22:53, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

A Piece of blue sky.
I am not sure why you tagged a piece of blue sky as npov. every single sentence in the entire article states a fact (and most are sourced) except for that last bit, explaining the title, which as added by an anon ip (and frankly should be reverted). It would be most helpful if you could explain such actions on the talk page so other users can fix the problems if they do indeed exist. - Abscissa 11:53, 2 July 2006 (UTC)


 * OK, all fixed up now. Please leave me a message on my user talk page so I can get all excited about having new messages (hey, I did it for you!!) - Abscissa 12:52, 2 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Yup, igot the message before. Kindly confirm on my talk page that this si the end of it :-)  - Abscissa 12:59, 2 July 2006 (UTC)


 * This is getting silly, the page looks fine, I fixed it up a bit and I see you did also. I get the last word!! Have a good long weekend... - Abscissa 13:17, 2 July 2006 (UTC)


 * If this goes on any further we will have to send you to ethics or just declare you!! :-) - Abscissa 13:22, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

Signpost updated for July 3rd.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.

Signpost updated for July 10th
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.

Who came first, Glen or God?
The universe is divided on the answer of this question....

Thank you
I want to thank you for commending my efforts on the Charlie Sheen article. It's nice to see efforts being noticed.

David Keysor
Just a FYI, I removed your speedy and userfied the page. Dipics 03:03, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

I was ambivalent also. So I figured it was the lesser of two (or three) evils. Dipics 03:07, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

Bodybuilding project
I see that you recently created a bodybuilding project. I've been working for a while on articles related to female bodybuilding, and I just added myself to the list of participants. I thought there are some things that should be discussed, so I'm posting something on the project discussion page. fbb_fan 03:12, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

VP Approval...
Hey, thanks for the approval! I assumed for some unknown reeason thet the 250 edit limit referred to overall edits.. which goes to show I should read through more carefully. So thanks for taking the time to find out about my edits rather than just refusing, it's nice to feel appreciated. Lets hope I can keep up to the high standards of the VP team! Catch you around -- Errant talk (formerly tmorton166) 08:28, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

your welcome
Thanks for the welcome! I appreciate it much. Entropistorian 20:37, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

Abuse of admin priviledges
Consensus was reached in march/april. See Wikipedia Talk:WikiProject Bible. Clinkophonist 12:17, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

Ps the revert function may not be used for edit disputes, and to do so is a violation of admin priviledges. Thanks in advance. Clinkophonist 12:18, 15 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Um, you did take the time to notice that he's not an admin before "warning," right? Essjay ( Talk )  12:22, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

Signpost updated for July 17th


You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Treebark ( talk ) 23:00, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

Broken revert?
See, which should have completely reverted two anonymous IP edits but actually did not revert some blanking. Remember that, for reverting, you can open up an old revision and click "edit" and save it for a proper revert. —Centrx→talk &bull; 01:35, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

Becoming a Mediation Cabal Mediator
Responding to the question on my talkpage:

Joining Mediation Cabal is rather a lot like joining a WikiProject: It can be as simple as selecting a case and saying, "I'd like to mediate this case" on the page. If you'd like to have your name added to the list of current mediators, you can do so yourself or just say the word and I'll do it for you, no problem!

As far as case selection, I've noticed that the best results tend to be from those mediators who are more interested in the mediation aspect than the specifics of the case: If you're an astronomer, for instance, it'd be best to stay away from astronomy cases that way personal biases don't come into play. We've got a number of thought-provoking links and information under Mediation Cabal/Suggestions for mediators also, and a visit or two to mediate.com can never hurt, right?

Hope that helps, and if you have any other questions, please feel free to ask! ~Kylu ( u | t )  16:15, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

Oh, and by the way....

Thanks. :) ~Kylu ( u | t )  20:28, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to VandalProof!
Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, GIen! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. AmiDaniel (talk) 09:52, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

RfA Questions
Hi, just to let you know that I've answered the question you added to my RfA.-- Andeh 01:08, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

RfA Analysis tool
Hi GIen, the RfA Analysis tool (as well as all my other toolserver tools) were indeed unable, due to a mistake on my part. Thanks for pointing it out! :D If there's anything else I can do to improve my tools, please feel free to drop me a line. Cheers, Tangot a ngo 03:19, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

Rebecca Mader
Thank you for your help on Rebecca Mader's article! Much appreciated! loulou 15:31, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

My VandalProof Application
Dear Glen

You recently turned down my application to use VandalProof due to me having less than 250 mainspace edits. I understand the need for such precautions, however I was wondering if a flaw in the guideline had ever been considered. I have spent, and intend to continue spending, a reasonable amount of time on wiki as a newpage patroller, and as such many of my mainspace edits have been to add deletion requests which have subsequently caused the article to be deleted. This obviously means that I have made more mainspace edits than show up on the edit counters, and my mainspace edit count rises more slowly. Has this been taken into consideration when determining the guideline?

I don't expect my application to be reconsidered as a result of this comment. I shall reapply in a few days once I've spent a few more hours sorting stubs. Jibbles | Talk 19:34, 21 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Thanks for reconsidering :) Jibbles | Talk 19:58, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

Just wanted to respond from you talk to me about the my Mediation Cabal entry. Thank you. I am happy with the current state of things.

VandalProof issues
Hi Glen, thanks for adding me to the list of apporved VP users, unfortuantely I seem to be having issues installing it. It keeps asking me for a toobox.msi file which I don't seem to have, and after I've hit cancel a few times, the software loads abut I can't seem to do anything in it. It asks me to log on and whatnot but then it tells me I haven't successfully logged on even though it recognizes me... of course this is all after having installed 1.2.2. Anyhow, any help would be appreciated, otherwise, I'll just go back to reverting the old way. Thanks. --Blahm 16:09, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

Unfortunately no luck getting it work. Not a big deal, I'll do it 'the long way.' --Blahm 18:04, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

I apologize
For falsely accusing you. I know it was not really a public accusation, but I feel badly and feel inclined to make a public apology. You were doing your best to help and I returned kindness with hostility. I sincerely apologize. Named user 03:21, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
 * I'll reply here so discussion remains on this page :)
 * No apology needed my friend, you had every right to feel that way, and again I apologise to you for any undue stress. Thank you for seeing my misguided but well intentioned attempt to prevent any stress for you involving similar future incidents - without realising the stress I caused at the time. I appreciate your kind words, and thank you for being so understanding. - Gl e n 03:38, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

VP
Thanks! If I have any questions I will of course, let you know. :) SynergeticMaggot 07:40, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
 * By the way, your picture of the day has inspired me to go to London and edit there :p Looks like a wonderful spacious environment. SynergeticMaggot 07:42, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

Comment
Glen,

As I understand it, you are the person responsible for giving vandal proof to garfield226.

garfield is misusing this facility and I would appreciate it if he/she was further trained in its reasonable (non-overzealous) use. I am not a vandal!

qick to condemn - slow to retract - bending the rules again i see —The preceding unsigned comment was added by RoKeMo (talk • contribs) 23 July 2006.


 * Well my news isn't good I'm afraid. I'll reply on your talk page - Gl e n 09:57, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

Email
Email for you, please let me know when received. FT2 (Talk 12:08, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

Thanks but sorry...
Thankyou for inviting me to join the bodybuilding thing, but I don't really consider myself a bodybuilder, and I don't really know much about it. Thanks anyway though! Jamandell (d69) 16:07, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

Hi Glen
I noticed you are from Auckland. I know a psychology professor at the university there. He's done a lot of research on psychology and he's very approachable, so if you wanted a second opinion or more lit on something psych, just drop him an email. He's really helpful. I've some of his material myself, so I can send you something also if you like. Its really interesting stuff if you are into psychology. Savoylettuce 06:39, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

Hi again. Further to this, I understand you have knowledge of muscle building. Well, I have done a lot of research into the psychology side of this. It relates also to general learning, and even cognitive abilities. The research has shown that among all the so called psychological techniques (new age brain balancing, meditation, etc), mental rehearsal stands out as the only one that really works. From my own research, it can be done still or moving (no weights or undue exersions tho). Using a daily standing stretch (eyes closed) it is possible to mimic weight training and to stimulate the muscle strength and growth (weight training nearly always involves a natural stretch in a rep). Stretching movements that mimic lifting are great already, but when you add the synergetic effects of imagining pushing or pulling and balancing, you train both the nervous system and coordination to help lift weights in the gym. Anyway, I'm going to collect some research on this aspect of training. If you have any suggestions on where it may be appropriate on Wikipedia, just drop me an email or post here. Savoylettuce 07:38, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

VandalProof
Omg thanks sooo much GIen ;) notice i got ur name right that time :P Thanks! --Deon555|talk 11:31, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for reply, and no problem. I will get back to you as soon as the status of 250 works are filled. K^ 16:52, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

Signpost updated for July 24th


You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. --Michael Snow 03:55, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

How dare you threaten me
First of all, considering you make a living selling snake oil, you are the last one to mouth off. To your credit, I will say that the All Blacks kick some serious ass. Secondly, I happen to orginate from CT, and loath Republican Lieberman. Most importantly, the "five second frencher" comment was really funny, and I was hoping it would stay up long enough for some friends to see it. I'll stick to fark.com to get my jollies, please take care of NZ so I can move there after the Koreans nuke us and we turn them into a glass parking lot. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 83.46.8.250 (talk • contribs).

Wikipedia Research Survey Request
Hello, I am a member of a research group at Palo Alto Research Center (formerly known as Xerox PARC) studying how conflicts occur and resolve on Wikipedia. Due to your experience in conflict resolution on Wikipedia (e.g., as a member of the Mediation Cabal) we’re extremely interested in your insights on this topic. We have a survey at http://www.surveymonkey.com/s.asp?u=400792384029 which we are inviting a few selected Wikipedians to participate in, and we would be extremely appreciative if you would take the time to complete it. As a token of our gratitude, we would like to present you with a PARC research star upon completion. Thank you for your time.

Parc wiki researcher 00:02, 26 July 2006 (UTC) PARC User Interface Research Group

coultard
why, thanks. It's definitely a pleasure documenting the end of her 15 minutes. Gzuckier 17:19, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

VandalSniper
You've been approved to use VandalSniper. Please let me know if you have any problems getting it working. --Chris (talk) 21:29, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

Re: Ann Coulter article
Thank you. As you wrote, I think that this editor knew better. -- Dcflyer 04:56, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

Re: Brittney Skye article
As far as I am aware the link was not intended as a vehicle for advertising, and was more given as a way to find out more information from a viewpoint that is inside the adult industry rather than the stub that is currently in place. As recommended by you I have put this on the discussion page of the article and I am also currently working on fleshing out the article further. --Steve355 16:42, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

Regarding my VandalProof rejection
I find it strange that you rejected me based on the recent changes and time that I have been with wiki.

I have over 388 main page edits [] and did my first edit last year and have been had most of my activity since June and added a few images to wiki commons. It doesn't stress me out or anything just seemed like a bulk copy paste rejection.

Cheers

--Nibuod 07:27, 31 July 2006 (UTC)