User talk:Gligan/Archives/2008/July

Image source problem with Image:Image:12_Telerig.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Image:12_Telerig.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 12:23, 2 July 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. OsamaK 12:23, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:183_BG.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:183_BG.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:12, 2 July 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. OsamaK 18:12, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

Albania
Hi. You may have noticed that user "Taulant23" has been removing Bulgarians and Serbians from the list of nations that have ruled over the present-day territory of Albania. This is an ongoing problem. You have provided one source providing evidence that Bulgaria was present there and I have provided three sources demonstrating Serbia's former presence. My sources are quite neutral and include political maps, a paragraph from a Montenegrin gov't website, and a book by Alan Dundes where Vuk Karadžić is cited. The vandal has not provided any counter evidence that could cast doubt on our sources and explains his reverting us only by saying "STOP UR POV". I am unfamiliar with starting administrative intervention on vandalism cases and would appreciate it if you could help me out here by contacting a wikipedia acquaintance of sufficient ability to intervene in the matter. Thank you. Off topic now... Why do you support the independence of Vojvodina? Your stance on FYROM+Bulgaria and independence of Wales and Scotland suggests that you desire to see unity and self-determination for all peoples. I don't see how supporting the fragmentation of Serbia(without Kosovo) resonates with your other supported causes. Anyway, just something I find a bit odd. You don't have to respond to that last bit. Its irrelevant to the matter at hand. Again, thanks for your help.
 * The vandal is: --Taulant23 (talk)
 * I am - Gkmx (talk) 15:34, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the reply. There has been actually quite an extensive dialogue in the discussion page for the Albania article where I along with two other users have been debating/discussing the legitimacy of the addition of Bulgarians and Serbians to the list. One of the users has agreed with me (this one actually was willing to look through the sources and reason clearly). The other user (the vandal) has not been willing to give a factually based reason as to why Serbs and Bulgarians are being removed from the list. I'll give it a try to speak with the vandal personally again. I'm sorry if the Vojvodina question was too personal. Though, if you do want to let me know your reasoning for your position, my email is 'gkmxjm@gmail.com'. Its really just curiosity on my part. Regards, Gkmx (talk) 03:48, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXVIII (June 2008)
The June 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 18:49, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

Привет отново!
Искам да те попитам какво мислиш за един въпрос в българската уикипедия, но тука не мога да разясня толкова голяма тема виж ми профила там. --Николов (talk) 12:27, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Tikvesh Uprising
Hi, since you are a member of Wikiproject Bulgaria, can you please put a logo of the project on the page of the Tikvesh Uprising? Thank you. Chief White Halfoat (talk) 17:54, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

Hey Gligan
Offending?? What question about the cultural marks about Greeks, Romans and Ottoman’s should I loose my time explained to you. Are you crazy? You would tell me that there is no cultural mark that Greeks have left in Albania? If you don’t know this, why you really revise in here. Maybe we can come in a compromise by adding that Albania was overruled by these people(Serbs,Bulgarians etc etc) but there is not such a think as cultural and ruins in Albania from Bulgaria or Serbia.--Taulant23 (talk) 18:53, 7 July 2008 (UTC) p.s.I have nothing with Bulgarians.


 * OK,I will double check on it.As a cultural mark you would describe a church too?--Taulant23 (talk) 19:18, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

unification
You support what???--MacedonianBoy (talk) 14:33, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
 * You live in dream as your country!--MacedonianBoy (talk) 17:27, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Hey dreamer, this (Perhaps your only chance is your government to admit the falsification of historical documents (which as you know began even before the Serbian and then Yugoslav occupation), remove the still-existing Serbian influence and join Bulgaria before it is too late.) is not offensive for you? And I do not think anything about this topic, I am sure thet this is the dream of every BG and because of thet I do not get it how you people can live with thet idea when we are different nation? I do not get it this BG idea, making one nation Bulgarian. It is the same as if I consider and claim BG as Serbian territory and nation. LOL  --MacedonianBoy (talk) 17:59, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
 * I know why! You should stop reading BG books and BG authors. It causes dangerous effects and with reading only BG books, it will be very difficult to accept the reality. The Macedonians were never BG and I ensure you thet none of the ethnic Macedonian (even the most stupid one) were never even thought thet they are BG. And MK and BG were never one country, MK was occupied from BG, we destroy every single Фашист. Awake from thet San Stefano dream! Also, Macedonian's origin is from here, while the BG are from Asia, it is a fact.--MacedonianBoy (talk) 18:19, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Stop with the personal attacks. Another reference to the Tatar nonsense and you're going to the noticeboard...again. Stop attacking other contributors, but look into your own words first. -- L a v e o l  T 13:55, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
 * bla, bla, bla... Where did you read Tatar?--MacedonianBoy (talk) 14:32, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
 * What I mean is that you're saying it, but not with the exact same words. I told you to stop making references to it. We all know what it means. And we're not guys from the east or the south either. I suggest you take a short break for the rest of the day for example. It seems you have got into too much disputes for a day and the way you're going they're not gonna end. Just close wikipedia and come back tomorrow. This is a friendly advice - I just think you'll get into more trouble if you continue. -- L a v e o l  T 14:57, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks doctor! --MacedonianBoy (talk) 16:58, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Drop the sarcasm already. -- L a v e o l  T 17:05, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

Bulgarian revolutionary organiZations
Hi, I tried to move the page Bulgarian revoloutionary organisations to a page with the correct spelling, i.e Bulgarian revolutionary organizations (s -> z), but I can't move it according to the wiki standarts, described in Help:Moving a page. I can't find a 'move' tab?? Can you move pages in Wikepedia? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chief White Halfoat (talk • contribs) 18:49, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

Bulgaria World War I
You created Bulgaria in World War I, there is already a page that similar Bulgaria during World War I. Why don't you mix 2 articles together? Kinh Duong Vuong (talk) 00:47, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Att-4530fb8827831l_zv.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Att-4530fb8827831l_zv.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 11:34, 21 July 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. OsamaK 11:34, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

Samuel of Bulgaria
Hi, Thanks for you note regarding this article. I had a look through it and made some pretty minor changes where I could. It made a good read and a good article. However I personally don't think it is quite ready for Featured Article status. There are still some sentences such as 'From 980 to 997, he was a general for Roman I of Bulgaria, the second surviving son of Emperor Peter I of Bulgaria, and co-ruled with him, as Roman bestowed him command of the army and the real authority.' which sounded rather poor but I was not sure how to fix them (I'm not the greatest wordsmith myself!). I also noted in the infobox that it has a caption 'Anthropological reconstruction of Samuil's face' but no image. Without an image there and a relevant caption I doubt it would be featured. You could try again for good article status first but suggest getting a more experienced copyeditor to go through the article first. Davewild (talk) 09:41, 30 July 2008 (UTC)