User talk:Gligan/Archives/2010/February

Sorry to tell but be more polite, or it is I who will report you. It's not me who called your edit idiotic. The two sources YOU included said "Danubian Bulgarian Khanate" not "medieval Bulgarian state". What to discuss? Your refs? --Factuarius (talk) 00:29, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

February 2010
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on First Bulgarian Empire. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Athenean (talk) 00:31, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

Lead
Why should information like this be avoided in the lead[] or taken as unconstructive? The establishment of the state is something that needs to be part of the lead.Alexikoua (talk) 23:02, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

I find Avidius' version more accurate by the way. I'll post my comments in the article's discussion, however there is no reason to insist on completely removing this part of information.Alexikoua (talk) 23:12, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLVII (January 2010)
The January 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:37, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

Lead for First Bulgarian Empire
If you could write out a copy of what you think the lead should consist of, I would be more than happy to take a look and compare/contrast with Athenean's suggestion. Thanks. --Kansas Bear (talk) 19:16, 5 February 2010 (UTC)


 * I've posted a rough draft of a conglomeration of things I believe the lead should contain. --Kansas Bear (talk) 06:48, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

Bulgaro - Vlach empire
Look at the frenc version of "Second Bulgar Empire" http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regnum_Bulgarorum_et_Valachorum. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Iaaasi (talk • contribs) 11:28, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

"Vlach-Bulgarian Empire is not universally accepted"

there isn't even a word about it in the article (Iaaasi (talk) 11:57, 13 February 2010 (UTC))

It would be appropriate to place the -cn- for a while before removing this parts that claimed that it was called Bulgar-Vlach.

Morever I see that Monsh.&Kostja, are completely ignoring your lead proposal in 1st Bulgarian Empire, proposing a pov-peacock style one.Alexikoua (talk) 21:53, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

Administrator Noticeboard/Incidents
Hi Gligan, I am currently accused of disruptive behaviour in Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. This occured after I presented the 20 sources in the First Bulgarian Empire discussion page. I mentioned your name there. Please read through and share your opinion. Thank you.--Monshuai (talk) 07:23, 15 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Thank you for sharing your opinion Gligan. I very much appreciate it.--Monshuai (talk) 21:25, 15 February 2010 (UTC)


 * You are mentioned here now: Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement sulmues (talk) --Sulmues 15:25, 17 February 2010 (UTC)