User talk:Glimmer Guru

Edits must have sources
Your edits need to have reliable and verifiable sources added, or they will be removed. If you have the sources, add them or ask for help to add them. If there are no sources, they cannot be added. Alansohn (talk) 03:23, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Your recent edits this morning also contained no sources whatsoever and no explanations for any of the changes in the edit summary. As such, all of these edits have been removed. I am hoping that I can work to show how to add sources, but until that goal is reached these edits violate Wikipedia policy that requires reliable and verifiable sources for the changes you have been making. Alansohn (talk) 13:55, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

June 2016
Hello, I'm Alansohn. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Paterson Fire Department, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. ''All material added *MUST* have sources. The edits often conflict with each other, even with the same article.'' Alansohn (talk) 14:45, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Newark, New Jersey. This pattern of adding deliberate factual errors -- be it for area, population or fire department -- has to end. Alansohn (talk) 15:55, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Widr (talk) 16:08, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Widr (talk) 14:12, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  06:35, 20 June 2016 (UTC)