User talk:Glmike523

Speedy deletion nomination of Sons of San Paolino


A tag has been placed on Sons of San Paolino requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Sean ( Ask Me? ) 22:09, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

Declined The Giglio
 You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation. Your article has been reviewed and because some issues were found, it could not be accepted in its current form; it is now located at Wikipedia&. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. Feel free to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! This needs to be re-written to be encyclopedic. At the moment it is written in a very non-neutral manner similar to what you'd see on a promotional flyer to get people to come to a gathering. I'm also not sure that you need to go into extreme detail about every location that celebrates the Giglio. Unless each location has extremely different practices and it's considered notable (ie, multiple reliable sources about each location), it's not necessary to list the history and practices of each location. See WP:RS about what is considered to be a reliable source. It sounds like this is an encyclopedic topic, it's just not written in a manner that is considered encyclopedic. If you're curious about how something like this could be written in an encyclopedic manner, try looking at some of the various pages for religious practices, such as First Communion, Confirmation, or Marian feast days. If you are still having problems, feel free to ask some of the kind souls from WikiProject Religion. They're used to writing pages in an encyclopedic manner for all kinds of different religious practices, so definitely utilize them as a resource. Tokyogirl79 (talk) 06:24, 24 November 2011 (UTC)tokyogirl79
 * BTW, your pictures are absolutely gorgeous!! You should definitely keep up the good work! Tokyogirl79 (talk) 06:27, 24 November 2011 (UTC)tokyogirl79

Possibly unfree File:Giglio 2010.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Giglio 2010.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:17, 2 April 2012 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with File:Giglio 2010 Brooklyn.JPG
Thank you for uploading File:Giglio 2010 Brooklyn.JPG.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the image description page states the source and copyright status of the derivative work, it only names the creator of the original work without specifying the status of their copyright over the work.

Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the original image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log].

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Stefan2 (talk) 13:45, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Giglio concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Giglio, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 09:52, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

Your article submission The Giglio


Hello Glmike523. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled The Giglio.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note, however, that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 02:05, 24 September 2013 (UTC)