User talk:GlobalNRG30

April 2014
Your addition to Kemper Project has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. &mdash; alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 22:59, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Prudent Investment


The article Prudent Investment has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * This is an essay. The sources don't discuss "prudent investment" in a way that shows that it's a suitable subject for an article.  Would have asked for a speedy, but can't see any criteria that apply exactly.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. &mdash; alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 23:09, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Prudent Investment


A tag has been placed on Prudent Investment requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://warrington.ufl.edu/centers/purc/purcdocs/papers/0528_Jamison_Rate_of_Return.pdf. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. &mdash; alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 23:23, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Prudent Investment for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Prudent Investment is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Prudent Investment until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. &mdash; alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 16:06, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

The AfD discussion
Look, I know it's frustrating, but just be patient. If your article is about something real and it's the kind of thing it's good to have articles about, others will tell me I'm wrong and then the article won't be deleted. You've jumped into Wikipedia all the way by writing an article first thing, and you're not familiar with how things are done, but please don't worry, this is just a normal thing. It's much easier to edit existing articles for a while and get an idea of what WP:N means in practice (that's the standard by which articles are kept or deleted) before you write your own. Anyway, don't worry. I may be wrong. If so, others will know.&mdash; alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 23:48, 17 April 2014 (UTC)