User talk:Globalnitish

Welcome!
Hi Globalnitish! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! I dream of horses (t) (c) Remember to &#123;&#123;ping&#125;&#125; me after replying off my talk page 05:26, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

May 2020
Hello, I'm Nyook. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Arctic have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Nyook ✉ 06:39, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

Hi Globalnitish! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor&#32;at Visakhapatnam gas leak that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia — it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. —[ Alan M 1  (talk) ]— 07:42, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

Another minor issue that I saw in your edits was the placement of references sentence-ending punctuation. In one case at least, you even reverted someone else's fix. This is incorrect. References go immediately punctuation, like this, not this. —[ Alan M 1  (talk) ]— 08:00, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

At Intermittent fasting you made major additions to the article (since reverted as not relevant) and made an Edit summary that was not a true description of your changes. David notMD (talk) 11:40, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

National varieties of English
Hello. In a recent edit to the page Visakhapatnam gas leak, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, India, or Pakistan use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the original author of the article used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. —[ Alan M 1  (talk) ]— 07:44, 11 May 2020 (UTC)