User talk:Globalskywalker2020

December 2019
Hello Globalskywalker2020. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Globalskywalker2020. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. MrOllie (talk) 12:49, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

Hi Mr. Ollie

At this moment i am not a professional wikipedia writer but have intent of being a distinguished writer with Wikipedia. I am a Project management professional in construction industry and have thorough knowledge in subjects related to construction (as carry over 15 years of field experience). I have a full time job but writing has always been my hobby. In a nutshell, i am neither linked to the content or any organization on which i have done edits. I am publishing data known to me.

My Regards

Hello. Your recent edit appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 17:48, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gilco Global (January 1)
 Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Gilco_Global Articles for creation help desk] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by DGG was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

 DGG ( talk ) 09:54, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

January 2020
Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Badshah (rapper). While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. NitinMlk (talk) 19:21, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. MrOllie (talk) 02:41, 2 January 2020 (UTC)

Mr Ollie

There is no disruptive editing. I have proof of all data I am publishing. The fact that I don't understand is that no one is verifying the references I am attaching to support the text. Remaining texts as edited are technical matter which can be got verified by any subject expert. I would like to reiterate that I am a construction professional with Rich field experience making me in possession of thorough domain knowledge. Please guide me on how can I make Wikipedia understand the credibility of my texts ?

My regards Globalskywalker2020 (talk) 15:26, 2 January 2020 (UTC)


 * You're inappropriately promoting particular companies on Wikipedia. I suggest you write about the industry in general, using sources that are not affiliated to any particular commercial concern. - MrOllie (talk) 15:51, 2 January 2020 (UTC)

I have been writing about companies whose information I have with me because I thought it will be easy to publish article on credible and well established entities strangely which have limited or no previous information on Wikipedia. Shall refrain in future. However, you can read about these companies to verify my claims. Globalskywalker2020 (talk) 16:50, 2 January 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Orona Group


Hello, Globalskywalker2020. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Orona Group".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 12:15, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

July 2020
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of companies of India, you may be blocked from editing. You have previously been warned about making non-notable and promotional additions - Arjayay (talk) 11:29, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

I fail to understand why i am being discouraged from publishing credible content on company which is genuinely a leading company in India and this can be verified online through Indian government records as publicly available for viewing. Furthermore, this company has received several awards which can be followed from the following references also: https://www.zaubacorp.com/company/GILCO-GLOBAL-PRIVATE-LIMITED/U29253HR2014PTC052334 https://theceostory.in/company-in-focus-2020/gilco-global-orona/ https://www.nbmcw.com/interviews/31933-gilco-global-pvt-ltd-and-orona-a-synergy-that-marks-the-beginning-of-a-new-era.html https://industry.siliconindia.com/vendor/gilco-global-offering-elevators-with-the-latest-technology-and-innovative-designs-cid-10015.html https://www.thehansindia.com/posts/index/National/2018-12-22/Spanish-elevator-giant-launches-latest-trends-in-India/462795 https://www.newsheads.in/business/companies/orona-escalates-business-in-india-article-53854 https://www.forbesindia.com/article/brand-connect/gilco-global-offering-building-mobility-solutions-with-the-latest-technology/57541/1 https://elevation.fandom.com/wiki/Gilco_Global and many more...