User talk:Gloden

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used as a platform for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. CrispMuncher (talk) 01:29, 20 March 2010 (UTC).

March 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Scroll saw has been reverted. Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://scrollsawworkshop.blogspot.com/, http://scrollsawbowls.blogspot.com/ (matching the regex rule \bblog(?:cu|fa|harbor|mybrain|post|savy|spot|townhall)?\.com\b). If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, or similar site, then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest). If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 03:18, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. CrispMuncher (talk) 04:47, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 13:23, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. --SineBot (talk) 20:17, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

You have violated the three-revert rule. Any administrator may now choose to block your account. In the future, please make an effort to discuss your changes further, instead of edit warring. CrispMuncher (talk) 22:48, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

Recent comments on my talk page
I refuse to let you cast yourself as the injured party in all this, and I reject the allegation I have been unwilling to communicate. Why don't you look at the very top of this talk page? Who put the very first message there? Where was your willingness to communicate then? Instead you chose to ignore that message and the clear sentiments expressed in edit summaries. These were perfectly polite at all times. I (and others) simply made our position clear. If you had not chosen to ignore that the comments you consider to be offensive would not have been made.

As for 3RR there is nothing to discuss. You broke the rule in your attempts to overrule the rest of the community. That is indisputable. It is also grounds for an automatic block. I did not press for one because I felt it would inflame the situation. I was actually doing you a favour.

As I said, I refuse to allow you to portray yourself as the wronged party being silenced by the "Wiki Masters" (your words, not mine). Ultimately you are a spammer pushing a site that you have a personal involvement in. Let us not forget that. CrispMuncher (talk) 11:53, 21 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Crispmuncher, please read WP:BITE. I can't say your level of communication here is exemplary. I see most of your communication is in edit summaries; unless the new user knows the "history" function he will likely miss that. You can't just issue one template and then get upset when the understanding isn't automatic. Your first human communication with a new user need not be hostile. Auntie E. (talk) 17:25, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

Please reconsider
I apologise for your treatment you received so far here. Crispmuncher was absolutely in the wrong and violated policy relating to treatment of new users and also did not show you the good faith he should have. I hope you reconsider editing here, as we are not all as bitey. Auntie E. (talk) 23:33, 21 March 2010 (UTC)