User talk:Glossary202

RE: Tim Bachman judicial ban
Where might one find any kind of proof of a judicial ban of this information? The story is in all the newspapers, for God's sake! Please provide proof of this assertion, as I don't believe that simply stating that charges have been layed is a violation ANY type of judicial order about a pending court case. Please respond or your reversion will have to be treated as vandalism and reverted. Freshfighter9talk 01:57, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
 * I should also point out to you that Wikipedia has a policy prohibiting the deceptive or misleading use of multiple accounts. Sock puppetry is very much frowned upon and will result in an indefinite suspension of your editing privileges. Freshfighter9talk 02:24, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

June 2010
Your recent edits to Tim Bachman could give Wikipedia contributors the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that making such threats on Wikipedia is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's policies on legal threats and civility. Users who make such threats may be blocked. If you have a dispute with the content of any page on Wikipedia, please follow the proper channels for dispute resolution. Please be sure to comment on content not contributors, and where possible make specific suggestions for changes supported by reliable independent sources and focusing especially on verifiable errors of fact. Thank you.  Teapot  george Talk  20:44, 17 June 2010 (UTC)