User talk:Gloupsupaszn

Rad Luck moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Rad Luck, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Praxidicae (talk) 14:20, 9 April 2020 (UTC)

Rad Luck moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Rad Luck, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Sulfurboy (talk) 04:20, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Rad Luck for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rad Luck is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Rad Luck until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Praxidicae (talk) 12:17, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

April 2020
Hello Gloupsupaszn. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Gloupsupaszn. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Praxidicae (talk) 12:19, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

I am not directly or indirectly being compensated for my edits Gloupsupaszn (talk) 17:22, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
 * you'll need to explain exactly how you took these photos and became the copyright holder in that case.
 * File:Rad Luck in front of Led.jpg
 * File:Rad Luck 100 racks.jpg
 * Praxidicae (talk) 17:36, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

I contacted him personally and asked if I could use his photos for the article. Rad Luck takes his own photos, he’s a photographer which is stated in the article, so he owns the rights to the photos. I was given permission and consent to use them by Rad Luck himself. Gloupsupaszn (talk) 01:49, 23 April 2020 (UTC)

I am also curious as to how he’s not notable enough there are notable sources provided. Gloupsupaszn (talk) 02:38, 26 April 2020 (UTC)