User talk:Glubbdrubb

Hi there

Just a couple of guidlines when "talking" on this talk page.

Comments made on this page will be replied to on this page so everything can be kept together. If I made a comment on your page and you would prefer to keep the conversation there, I will watch your page.

Thanks

Glubbdrubb (talk) 10:59, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

The Mansion of Happiness
I wanted to let you know The Mansion of Happiness passed its GA review. Thank you greatly for your interest and encouragement in preparing the article for review! ItsLassieTime (talk) 06:21, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

Trial of a Time Lord
Sorry for a late reply; Doctor Who project was a bit mental over the past few days. I agree; "Part" does look a bit better. If you have any questions, I have your talk page on watch :) Sceptre (talk) 01:37, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

Its great to hear from you. I will go down the list of criticisms in the GA review and see what can be done. If you want you can put your comments or suggestions in between each point. This will not be done all at once. I f it is not finished, know I will be back soon.

Lead

 * 1) I do not understand how he does not understand the description. It makes perfect sense to me.
 * 2) I think that has been dealt with by replacing "segment" with "part".
 * 3) Is there a way the first two sentences of the third paragraph can be simplified? I have read and re-read with out comprehension of what it actually means.
 * How does it look now? Sceptre (talk) 09:32, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
 * I see now what you meant. Thanks. Glubbdrubb (talk) 21:17, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) This is explained in the first paragraph of "Production".

In Production
Glubbdrubb (talk) 09:14, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) I will change the first "The" to "This" as it specifies exactly what you mean.
 * 2) By the time you read this it would have been changed.
 * 3) The reviewer needs to rephrase himself because I am confused. However, I understand the actual text in the article so I don't know what he is going on about.
 * I removed some paragraphs because they weren't sourced. Presumably, it comes from that paragraph. Sceptre (talk) 09:32, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

I just realised that this entire conversation is in the wrong place. It would make a lot more sense if this was done in the review itself. After all, that is the article's talk page. But perhaps you as a more experienced editor knows of a better place. I just thought each comment could be made underneath each criticism(like I have seen in other reviews). Glubbdrubb (talk) 14:51, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

Badnjak prose improvement
I like your improvements in the lead of the article, thank you. I hope you will copy-edit the rest of the text in this way, too :) VVVladimir (talk) 13:40, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

It will continue slowly... Glubbdrubb (talk) 07:20, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
 * It wasn't so slowly after all :) Nice work − thanks, Glubbdrubb. VVVladimir (talk) 19:31, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

1st Air Commando Group
G'Day (or night) Glubbdrubb. I'm rather intrigued by your message about citing sources, as I will paste below, the article has several sources listed [edit] Notes ^ p.176 Busch, Bryan Cooper Bunker Hill to Bastogne: Elite Forces and American Society 2006 Brasseys ^ http://www.explorepahistory.com/hmarker.php?markerId=958 ^ p.2627 Various authors Marshall Cavendish Encyclopedia of World War II 1985 ^ Sikorsky R-4 history ^ a b Masters, John The Road Past Mandalay Michael Joseph (1961) ^ Yancey, Madonna United States Air Force Air Commandos 2000 Turner Publishing. p.6 ^ Yancey, Madonna United States Air Force Air Commandos 2000 Turner Publishing. p.20 ^ http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,897935,00.html I have noticed on many Wikipedia articles a message at the top saying an article needs sources, yet they are referenced at the bottom of the page. At first I thought that initially the message was put on before there were any sources, with someone later adding them. Here I've quite a few. Could you explain to help my understanding of a good Wikipedia article please?Foofbun (talk) 23:41, 14 January 2009 (UTC)


 * I must be honest and say that my entire basis for what I said was the review Looper5920 (talk) had given it. Citations and referencing is not my strong :point so I would suggest that you :take it up with Looper5920 or with one of the other members of the military task :force.


 * I hope you resolve this issue so we can "upgrade" this article's grading. --Glubbdrubb (talk ) 19:12, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

Thanks Glubbdrubb, I'm still mystified by the comments on the article that you have pointed out so I have queried the 'head man' Roger Davies on the matter. I hope we get things right. TaFoofbun (talk) 23:41, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

Hiya
Hiya Glubbdrubb. I wanted to make sure people see your subsection thread at WT:GOCE so I moved it to a new section at the end, with the link to the October section. If you prefer it where it was, feel free to move it back. Nice to see conversation going at WT:GOCE. (Watchlisting) - Dan Dank55 (send/receive) 13:55, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Session fixation
I am actually not familiar with this attack, but I will see if I can find out. Sephiroth storm (talk) 21:19, 21 January 2009 (UTC)


 * If you read the article it is actually quite simple. But the problem is that one sentence in particular is incomprehensible. Check out the talk page under "clarifications". --Glubbdrubb (talk ) 12:09, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Air Commando Mystification
I'm mystifed Glubb, there's references galore as mentioned above, please explain why there are no sources?124.179.52.162 (talk) 22:51, 13 February 2009 (UTC)Hello again Glubb, my apologies as today is Valentine's Day and rather than wanting roses or chocolates my true love wanted my presence whilst she viewed properties so I was in a bit of a rush...Now let me get this straight, as I'm fairly not au fait with the world of Wikipedia...but as I understand it...you sent word that an Article I either created or contributed to had no references. I replied with a copy of the references in the article, you just replied that SOMEBODY ELSE did a review of it somewhere (where does one read reviews? Is their a magazine for Wikipedia critics?  I honestly don't know, please clue me in.) and he or she said there wasn't.  So question 1)why did this person not contact me him/herself?  Do YOU personally feel there are or are not references?  Are you a minion of someone who does not send letters?  Please give me a hand with this Glubbdrubb to make a first class articleFoofbun (talk) 03:16, 14 February 2009 (UTC)


 * I can assure you that I am no man's minion. What I have been trying to do is chase up on some of the articles that are lacking on some of the basic criterion for a higher quality rating. I base this on the rating given on the talk page for that article . If you click "show", you will see why the article does not come up to standard (according to another reviewer). As I said earlier, referencing is not my forte so I would recommend going to the original reviewer or the military task force under which the article falls for clarification. --Glubbdrubb (talk ) 12:54, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Hey Glubbdrubb! I've been referred to this matter by the MILHIST Wikiproject as the resident airborne warfare expert, as it were. I'll have a dig through my sources and see what I can dig up for the article; I know I have some bits on Burma which will hopefully have the Commando's activities in there. I'll start referencing as soon as I can, cheers Skinny87 (talk) 12:57, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

Copy-edit Jesuit Missions of the Chiquitos
Hi Glubbdrubb! Are you still planning to look over the article? bamse (talk) 19:27, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for the congratulations to the Jesuit Missions of the Chiquitos. Just wanted to let you know that it is up for peer review now. bamse (talk) 10:40, 9 August 2009 (UTC)

Copyedit Backlog Elimination Drive
Hi, as a member of the Guild of Copy Editors you're hereby notified of and invited to participate in the WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/Backlog elimination drives/May 2010. Please help us eliminate the 8,000+ copyedit backlog! Participating editors will receive barnstars and other awards, according to their level of participation. ɳorɑfʈ Talk! 00:16, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

Copyedit Backlog Elimination Drive
Hi, as a member of the Guild of Copy Editors you're hereby notified of and invited to participate in the WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/Backlog elimination drives/May 2010. Please help us eliminate the 8,000+ copyedit backlog! Participating editors will receive barnstars and other awards, according to their level of participation. ɳorɑfʈ Talk! 00:17, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

Grab some glory, and a barnstar
Hi, I'd like to invite you to participate in the Guild of Copy Editors July 2010 Backlog Elimination Drive. In May, about 30 editors helped remove the tag from 1175 articles. The backlog is still over 7500 articles, and extends back to the beginning of 2008! We really need your help to reduce it. Copyediting just a couple articles can qualify you for a barnstar. Serious copyeditors can win prestigious and exclusive rewards. See the event page for more information. And thanks for your consideration. ɳorɑfʈ Talk! 14:46, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

GOCE Backlog Elimination Drive Wrap-up
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of The Utahraptor at 22:11, 3 August 2010 (UTC).

November 2010 backlog elimination drive update
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of The Utahraptor (talk) at 15:47, 14 November 2010 (UTC).

GOCE elections
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors via SMasters using AWB on 01:40, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

November 2010 Backlog Elimination Drive Conclusion
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors at 23:39, 2 December 2010 (UTC).

GOCE Year-end Report
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 06:21, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

GOCE drive news
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors at 20:07, 16 January 2011 (UTC).

GOCE January Backlog elimination drive conclusion
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors at 15:12, 5 February 2011 (UTC).

GOCE drive newsletter
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 07:23, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

GOCE elections
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 07:51, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

GOCE drive invitation
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 09:01, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

GOCE drive newsletter
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 16:27, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

GOCE drive newsletter
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 01:09, 29 October 2011 (UTC)

GOCE newsletter
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 10:43, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

GOCE 2011 Year-End Report
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 06:18, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Mailing list
Hi there. The newsletter recipients are based on this list. I removed your name for you. Cheers. —Torchiest talkedits 13:02, 6 June 2013 (UTC)


 * My talk page thanks you and I thank you!--Glubbdrubb (talk ) 00:46, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

WikiProject Computer Security user status
Hello Glubbdrubb,

I would just like to inquire on your status on WikiProject Computer Security as the list of WikiProject Computer Security/Members is going to be improved to list active and inactive users.

This is update is being done according to a request for comments on the WikiProject Computer Security talk page. Be sure to state your status at the User status section in the WikiProject Computer Security talk page before the end of four weeks as this will state your status as inactive in the project if not done before then.

FockeWulf FW 190 (talk) 19:52, 16 August 2016 (UTC)