User talk:Gm2587

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/SWIMM


Hello Gm2587. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "SWIMM".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 21:47, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of SWIMM
Hello Gm2587,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged SWIMM for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Trivialist (talk) 09:24, 15 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Actually, I (and other users) just tag articles for possible deletion; an administrator reviews the article and does the actual deletion if it falls under the criteria for speedy deletion. It's nothing personal against you or the article's subject; it's just that the article did not establish that SWIMM is a notable-enough band for an article. If you would like to repost the article, with additional citations demonstrating their notability, that would be fine. Trivialist (talk) 19:03, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:SWIMM Band Pic.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:SWIMM Band Pic.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 21:38, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:SWIMM Band.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:SWIMM Band.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:38, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

Band notability
Please read WP:BAND. Also note that notability is not contagious; you cannot "catch" notability by touring with a notable band, recording at a notable studio, or performing at a notable venue. -- Orange Mike &#124;  Talk  13:32, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

I understand that, but what about Surfing Magazine and Transworld Surf Magazine using their music in their music videos? Gm2587 (talk) 19:27, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
 * The use of a piece of music in a video does not make it notable. Please read WP:BAND. -- Orange Mike &#124;  Talk  15:53, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Multiemployer Pension Reform Act of 2014


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Multiemployer Pension Reform Act of 2014 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Thank you for help. Junior5a (talk) 02:54, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

August 2016
Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as Kline-Miller Multiemployer Pension Reform Act of 2014. You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Plagiarism, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 20:33, 2 August 2016 (UTC)