User talk:Gmac91

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

February 2019
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ilhan Omar. Sir Joseph (talk) 20:51, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

Vandalizing?
How is removing opinions vandalizing? Gmac91 (talk) 20:53, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
 * You are removing large portions of text with little to no explanation. Most editors would consider that vandalism. You're already on the WP:3RR limit regarding reverts (reinserting/removing content or reverting others' edits repeatedly), so another edit like that will open you up to possible sanctions. You may want to join the discussion on the talk page and read WP:PILLARS before doing so. Wikieditor19920 (talk) 20:59, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

Opinions are not facts
I will refrain from editing further if the other editors refrain from disguising opinions as facts Gmac91 (talk) 21:02, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note that compliance with Wikipedia's rules and policies is not conditional on whether you are satisfied with other editors' conduct. There are guidelines that govern how controversial material is handled; if there is a blatant violation, rest assured than it will be justifiably removed. Wikieditor19920 (talk) 22:23, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

February 2019
Your recent editing history at Ilhan Omar shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Doug Weller talk 21:26, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

Discretionary sanctions covering articles and conten
Doug Weller talk 21:28, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

I’m Sanctioned Even Though I Made No Further Edits After Being Warned
I’d like to know why I was put under sanctions even though I didn’t make any new edits after being warned. Who can I appeal this to? Gmac91 (talk) 21:41, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
 * You're not sanctioned. Sir Joseph (talk) 21:53, 11 February 2019 (UTC)