User talk:Gman124/Archive 1

Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)
Here are a few links you might find helpful:


 * Be Bold!
 * Don't let grumpy users scare you off
 * Meet other new users
 * Learn from others
 * Play nicely with others
 * Contribute, Contribute, Contribute!
 * Tell us about you

You can sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

We're so glad you're here!--Edchilvers 18:01, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

About X-Men: Animated Series. Mistake?
I noticed that in the episode listing of Cold Comfort, the year for the airdate is "1997". Is this a mistake? If it is you are welcome to change it yourself. I also added a plot for Cold Comfort, so I also put "1997" in the infobox. You are also welcome to change that too. :] —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Wengistein (talk • contribs) 01:02, 24 December 2006 (UTC).

Marvel Comics characters
Please stop adding this to articles. If you look, you will find that they are already categorized in the appropriate Superhero or Villain cats already, which are subcats of Characters. CovenantD 14:49, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

Edit summaries
I have noted that you often edit without an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This is considered an important guideline in Wikipedia. Even a short summary is better than no summary. An edit summary is even more important if you delete any text; otherwise, people may think you're being sneaky. Also, mentioning one change but not another one can be misleading to someone who finds the other one more important; add "and misc." to cover the other change(s). Thanks! --Ppntori 22:37, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

Carnage
If you're going to delete it then you better add the new picture in the episode guide.--CyberGhostface 01:38, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!
 Merry Christmas, and  May the Edit be with you, always. T- borg (drop me a line)  19:46, 24 December 2006 (UTC)

X-Men episodes list
Hi, I have conditionally supported the FLC. If you need help give me shout or feel free to look at other lists for ideas. --GunnarRene 02:15, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

Hulk Image
is there any particular reason that instead of uploading your may 2007 cover under a new file name, you felt it necessary to replace the existing image? that sort of stealth imge changing is generally frowned upon. ThuranX 23:51, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Joe Quimby
Where did it say that Mary Bailey preceded Joe Quimby? --Jnelson09 22:59, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

Spider-Man
Just wanted to compliment you on your recent work on Spider-Man. Your careful use of precise language and insistence on verifiable citations is high-quality editing. My compliments and kudos!--Tenebrae 17:16, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

Absorbing Man
I agree that this is a much better image for the SHB, but it needs more information, such as who the artist is and what comic book it is from (or promo status, if that's what it is). CovenantD 20:42, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
 * i found the image at mavel.com and they didn't have the artist or the comic book listedGman124 20:53, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion tagging of Justice league episodes
I see you have tagged many redirects from titles of Justice League episodes with the deletion reason "Just because it's the name of a Justice League episode should not mean that it should redirect there". This does not appear to reflect any of the speedy deletion criteria. Please don't use speedy deletion tags for things you simply think are bad. If you really think these should all be deleted, you may list them at WP:RFD, but I should mention it is common to keep redirects like these to help people find the closest-related article currently available. Thanks. &mdash;dgies tc 05:36, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

X-Men list
You'll want to make your arguments at Wikipedia_talk:Featured_list_criteria. - Peregrine Fisher 00:07, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Go read the discussion at Wikipedia_talk:Featured_list_criteria. That should make it clear.  Basically, people are discussing whether episode lists should be able to be featured if they have screenshots. - 00:10, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

WP:3RR Violation
You may view the filed report here, and supply your defense if necessary. However, it seems to be a blatant violation, with over 8 reverts to the same edition. —Floria L 19:08, 12 April 2007 (UTC)


 * You reverted the other guy's edits, it wasn't the other way around. Floria L 20:04, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

Template syntax
The no copyright holder template expects the "month" parameter to be the spelled-out name of the month, as in. Using the month number leaves the image in a non-existant category, so admins won't delete it. --Carnildo 06:48, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

Thanks
for cleaning up the mess I accidentally left at List of Jackie Chan Adventures episodes. (ESkog)(Talk) 02:39, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
 * your welcome. Gman124 14:58, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Thanks!
Thanks for the Draft link, one question the Pro-Bowler colors are for players who made it as a rookie or who made it in their careers? (respond on my talk page please) Trevor GH5 03:00, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks again. Trevor GH5 04:46, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
 * You're Welcome. Gman124 00:24, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

Wikilinks in NFL Drafts
Regarding players, teams, positions, colleges, within the table data I believe it has been discussed several times to link all table data not just the first instance. While remaining to the usual link only first instance within the written article. If im mistaken on this one I'll cease to edit them completely. Also note often times player positions while they may appear to be the same are not and piped to specific positions. Slysplace |  talk  01:36, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
 * There are so many archives of the discussions on the NFL Project page related to the draft page series of lists, Who can keep up. I've fixed so many redirects and disambiqs while editing those pages that it is certainly much more than a simple revert, more likely I'll be re-editing the entire series if it comes up that they should be cleaned up. Also there are other group / project discussions related to "Lists" whih I may have miss interpreted that suggested the full linking in table data. This will take some time to sort out. Slysplace  |  talk  12:30, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
 * A quick review of what I've completed in the possibly unacceptable format 1936 - 1976 and some of 1978 using mostly an external editor with find and replace scripts, shows if the Article format is to be susatained I'll have to entirely un-wikilink every article and then manually find the first instance, could prove to be a whole lot of previously wasted effort and even more work to clean up ... I think I need a jury Slysplace  |  talk  15:08, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
 * I was thinking to do the same, I've added my self defense statement to your question but I think the obvious answer will be manually reverted (or worse revert entirely) to single instance wikilinks to continue the featured article hopes of the project and the hard core wikipedians. Thank's for yoru input, concern, and support no matter the outcome.  Slysplace  |  talk  02:22, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Finally got back to cleaning up some of the draft tables. The early era pages are the easiest with only 1 round in most of them. I must say though they just look incomplete in the link once article format. I suppose I could have just left them as I last edited but that's counter productive to the NFL Project goal. Slysplace  |  talk  01:18, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
 * I made several sortable at one time but reverted after I received e-mail that it was un-acceptable. I suppose I was just easily intimidated. I Like sortable, But then again I also felt full links were cleaner and more direct for the final user.

we (and others) will get the quality up to par no doubt. Keep up the good work Slysplace  |  talk  01:48, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

2007 NFL Draft
Your comment on adding a link to the Division I-AA receiving TD awards has been added. can you please close the 'comment' and provide your view for the 2007 NFL Draft FLC. Thanks. Kalyan 17:36, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Voted for support now. Gman124 19:23, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

sortable Draft
I think I got the 2 or 3 you missed (or beat you to it), now if we can get rid of the abbreviations and get some volunteers to work on rounds 2 + the series will be in good shape! Slysplace |  talk  02:27, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
 * As tedious as this is cleaning up the draft articles, I happened to glance at some of the history and diffs of the articles were both working on. If memory serves me you pointed out I had "Over Wikilinked" the entire series, And called attention to it in the NFL Project discussion group. Imagine my concern, I cant help but notice in the areas of HOF & Noteable players specifically in regards to the AFL your doing the same thing. This does seem a little counter productive to me as I've been cleaning up those links repeatedly. Are we working towards the same goal? Linked only once per article,

to quote the discussion in Wikipedia talk:WikiProject National Football League Basically first time only for each link. Every single one was linked originally in pretty much every draft, but there's really no reason for that. The other 60-odd drafts are gonna have to have that fixed.--Wizardman 02:44, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

Slysplace |  talk  02:14, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
 * It does appear we were both editing some articles at the same time, and it is monotonous, but there were a few with the AFL links repeatedly linked during and after the sortable update. I've triple checked everything from 1936 through 1969 for dupe links, disamibqs, and redirects and compacted some data and white space. 1936 - 1969 should be complete (with exception of needing expansion and opening paragraphs). I'll continue through the 70's & 80's next, an extra set of eyes would not hurt the process.  Slysplace  |  talk  11:48, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

SIlver Surfer
Regarding the Marvel animated universe article, are you really so sure that Silver Surfer is part of that continuity? We're not just talking about a plot hole here and there, like Red Skull having inconsistent combat abilities - every single time something on that series happens that could be related to another one, it goes a different way, so the only reasonable conclusion seems to be that they're separate universes. Caswin 20:05, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
 * yes, I believe that Silver Surfer (TV series) is a part of the Marvel animated universe. Gman124 01:34, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

How do I delete my user talk page(s)?
As a matter of practice user talk pages are generally not deleted, barring legal threats or other grievous violations that have to be removed for legal reasons; however, exceptions to this can be and are made on occasion for good reason. Please refer to right to vanish). -- Jreferee   T / C  17:11, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

FL Main page proposal
You either nominated a WP:FLC or closed such a nomination recently. As such, you are the type of editor whose opinion I am soliciting. We now have over 400 featured lists and seem to be promoting in excess of 30 per month of late (41 in August and 42 in September). When Today's featured article (TFA) started (2004-02-22), they only had about 200 featured articles and were barely promoting 20 new ones per month. I think the quality of featured lists is at least as good as the quality of featured articles was when they started appearing on the main page. Thus, I am ready to open debate on a proposal to institute a List of the Day on the main page with nominations starting November 1 2007, voting starting December 1 2007 and main page appearances starting January 1 2008. For brevity, the proposal page does not discuss the details of eventual main page content, but since the work has already been done, you should consider this proposal assuming the eventual content will resemble the current content at the featured content page. Such output would probably start at the bottom of the main page. The proposal page does not debate whether starting with weekly list main page entries would be better than daily entries. However, I suspect persons in favor of weekly lists are really voicing opinions against lists on the main page since neither TFA nor Picture of the day started as weekly endeavors, to the best of my knowledge. Right now debate seems to be among support for the current selective democratic/consensus based proposal, a selective dictatorial approach like that used at WP:TFA or a non-selective first in line/calendar approach like that used at WP:POTD. See the List of the Day proposal and comment at WP:LOTDP and its talk page.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 19:29, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

Featured List of the Day Experiment
There have been a series of proposals to initiate a Featured List of the Day on the main page. Numerous proposals have been put forth. After the third one failed, I audited all WP:FL's in order to begin an experiment in my own user space that will hopefully get it going. Today, it commences at WP:LOTD. Afterwards I created my experimental page, a new proposal was set forth to do a featured list that is strikingly similar to my own which is to do a user page experimental featured list, but no format has been confirmed and mechanism set in place. I continue to be willing to do the experiment myself and with this posting it commences. Please submit any list that you would like to have considered for list of the day in the month of January 2008 by the end of this month to WP:LOTD and its subpages. You may submit multiple lists for consideration.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:LOTD) 02:47, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

Incredible Hulk is a reboot.
If you read through the article, what you'll find is that the new movie will not directly contradict the entirty of Hulk, and will rely upon the audience now being familiar with the basics of the Hulk's origins and so on. The new movie will tweak and alter those things it needs to to fit the new story, and will not create a brand new origin tale. This makes it at best a 'passive' sequel. However, it's an entirely new cast and production crew with a new vision and direction and new goals, with a different hulk (one that doesn't grow, for one). As such, it was decided that passive reliance upon audience knowledge based on premises given in the first film is not enough to call it a sequel. Further, Ed Norton's quotes in the article make it clear that the older Penn quote is out of date, as Norton said he rewrote sections specifically to distance the new film from the older film. That intent to differentiate is also clear support that it's a reboot. ThuranX (talk) 17:08, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

NFL draft pages
I noticed you put several of them up for FLR. Generally, you should mention concerns on the talk page and then go to FLR if they are not addressed, and your concerns seem easily addressable to me. -- Scorpion0422 01:35, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
 * but they have to find references for all drafts and I don't think anyone is going to work on it anytime soon. Gman124 (talk) 02:13, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
 * That is quite an assumption, but aside from that, could you notify the nominators (found in the articlehistory), WikiProject National Football League and possibly WikiProject College football as a courteous note. Otherwise, they might not find about it. Thanks. Woody (talk) 20:34, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

{|width=100% cellspacing="1" cellpadding="1"
 * style="background: #d0f0c0; border:2px solid darkgreen; -moz-border-radius-topleft: 20px; -moz-border-radius-topright: 20px; -moz-border-radius-bottomright: 20px; -moz-border-radius-bottomleft: 20px;" colspan=6 height=90|
 * style="background: #d0f0c0; border:2px solid darkgreen; -moz-border-radius-topleft: 20px; -moz-border-radius-topright: 20px; -moz-border-radius-bottomright: 20px; -moz-border-radius-bottomleft: 20px;" colspan=6 height=90|

The Alien Costume
Just to let you know, I'll be redirecting that soon. Pretty much all of the information is original research (you cannot use circular logic or user edited sources to cite something), and anything left over doesn't warrant an article. TTN (talk) 16:33, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
 * most of the stuff is from marvel toonzone and none of the stuff is original research. Gman124 (talk) 16:37, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
 * There are only two pages from that site in the production section, and I don't even know if they're relevant. For the rest of them, you're using the works you're claiming relate to this episode to cite your claims, which is OR, and user edited sites, which cannot be used. TTN (talk) 16:45, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
 * which stuff do you claim to be "OR", even though I think you are just picking on me for not have your way on redirecting all the episode pages. and i'm not making up false stuff if that's what you are trying to say. Gman124 (talk) 17:39, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I suggest that you read over WP:OR. It doesn't necessarily mean that you made up the information. It means that it's your own personal interpretation without any reliable sources to back it. When you claim that X is based off of Y and cite Y as your source, you're just telling where you got your interpretation rather than showing that it is true. TTN (talk) 18:24, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I removed that stuff now and the article still have alot of stuff. and also moved stuff to the top of the article. Gman124 (talk) 05:00, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

If you're going to keep bringing these episode articles back, can you please try to bring them to our notability standards? While what you're trying to do is fine, you're missing the target by quite a bit. Notability isn't established from a couple of fairly trivial creator notes and a review from a site that isn't really reliable in that area. You need information like in The Last Temptation of Krust, Zero Hour (Stargate SG-1), In Excelsis Deo, Last Exit to Springfield, and other good episode articles. TTN (talk) 19:20, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I'm putting in as much info as I can find, and you said that you don't consider tv.com amd imdb.com to be very relevant, yet the In Excelsis Deo episode, half the references are from tv.com and it's listed as a good article. seems to me like you are only opposing cartoon articles and leaving out the others. comic articles are the one that need to be fixed first, like Star Wars: Republic, it doesn't even have anything on the main page, you don't seem to be bothered by that. how can you consider one thing notable and not the other. Also when you merge something you are supposed to move some stuff from the articles to the main page, why don't you ever do that? Gman124 (talk) 17:13, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Yeah, that one turns out not to be as great as an example. I was just trying not to overuse The Simpsons articles. Though, only one production reference is using it wrong, while the others deal with filler reception. It's not the best, but the other references sort of make up for it. My main focus is on episode and character articles, so I have no real interest in fixing other pages at the moment. There are two million articles to possibly work on, so "go fix everything else first" isn't a very workable argument. Merging comes when info needs to be salvaged. These episodes are just plot summaries, which are already covered. TTN (talk) 20:55, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I didn't bring back that many episode pages anyway, only three or four, the for season two of Spider-Man, I just merged season two episodes on one page, since the etire season was a season long story. trying to make it like a season page. Gman124 (talk) 05:24, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
 * That's why I stated what you're trying to do is fine, but you're still missing the mark by quite a bit. You've added nothing that actually warrants an article. If you really want to work on something, you should work on the episode lists instead. If you have official sources stating important pieces of information (not fansites interpreting which comics they were based off of), add those to the summaries or something. TTN (talk) 19:29, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Some of the stuff is from people that worked on the shows and gave interview to toonzone, so are you saying that those interviews are not valid either? also toonzone has stuff about all cartoon shows not just a particular show and I don't think it's a fan site. Gman124 (talk) 19:48, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Interviews are fine, but they're not enough to hold an article. It's essentially trivia without some real context. If you want the notes to be mentioned, all you need to do is rework the main summaries to be like "After Peter puts on his costume, he does x, which is based off of comic y. *ref*" Toonzone is just an advanced fansite. Like some sites, some of it can be used, but not all of it is great. TTN (talk) 20:03, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Fine I will do do that, got anything else you want fixed on the episode pages? Gman124 (talk) 22:18, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Unnecessary season splits
Generally, we do not split episode lists into season articles without the seasons having information on them. While that page is large KB wise, a good chunk of that space comes from the tables anyways, which doesn't really count towards needing to be split. If you want to split them, you'll have to find production and reception information on the entire seasons, which doesn't seem likely. If you could merge that one back in, that would be good. TTN (talk) 00:05, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Fine but once I find stuff I will split them because the episode page is just too long know because there's around 150 episodes.Gman124 (talk) 00:11, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Splitting the page does make it smaller and half the page is made from summaries, so I think it's best if the pages are split and most of the info is in season pages. Gman124 (talk) 16:58, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Comics Articles for Deletion
One or more articles you’ve been involved in editing (Melter, Ringer (comics), Ego the Living Planet, or others) has been nominated for deletion. If you feel you can make contributions to the article to improve it and make it worth keeping, please do so. BOZ (talk) 14:58, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

An answer?
Was the section, that was below mine, the answer I was looking for? Does it provide the powers and abilities? Please respond on Talk:Superman X. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 19:21, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
 * It is a little wierd, however, I think you should integrate that into the article. The only difference I see is the picture and storyline. Thoughts? Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 22:17, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Wrong warning?
Friendly note: Seems you made a mistake warning User talk:209.222.44.66 about vandalism edits to Brochure as it was a different IP. -- Alexf42 14:23, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Archiving talk pages of Redirect pages
I don't understand your action at Talk:Star Wars prequel trilogy. Why did you move the talk page to Talk:Star Wars prequel trilogy/archive and then request deletion of the original page? While talk pages of redirects are hard to find, there is no reason to make them impossible to find. Jon513 (talk) 22:37, 26 April 2008 (UTC)


 * I see now that it is linked from Talk:Star Wars (film series), which is the most logical way to find that archive. I don't see any benefit in adding a "/archive" to it; why make extra work for yourself.  Jon513 (talk) 09:14, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

Asking about the X-Men's animated appearance on Spider-Man (1994 TV series)
The X-Men were animated under different house on their program than on Spider-Man's (even though they were meant to take place in the same universe). This was supposed to give you an example of what they looked like on Spider-Man when compared to on their show from around that time. Besides, how can it "mess up the table" when the image goes with the Spider-Man crossover section. TMC1982 (talk) 10:20 p.m., May 2008 (UTC)

List of Philadelphia Eagles first-round draft picks
Hey, thanks for your note. I'll take another look at it and reply on the FLC page. :) GreenJoe 13:19, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

FLC
Quick note to say I left more comments at Featured list candidates/Seinfeld (season 3). Regards, Matthewedwards (talk· contribs· count· email) 06:43, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Re: List of Dallas Chaparrals/San Antonio Spurs head coaches
While you are indeed correct that the Spurs were previously know as the Chaparrals, see other featured lists like List of New England Patriots head coaches, List of San Diego Chargers head coaches, List of Washington Redskins head coaches, (and much more), who all previously were known as a different name. Furthermore, "San Antonio Spurs" is the current name of the franchise, and to people who are unfamiliar Dallas Chaparrals might confuse the list as two different teams. They were the same teams, just playing in different eras. I hope you understand, « Milk's Favorite Cøøkie 23:18, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

Marvel Animated Universe
Just to clarify, the Marvel Animated Universe contains any animated TV show from Marvel to premiere in the time frame of X-Men (1992) to Avengers: United They Stand (1999). Therefore, also included is Spider-Man (1994), Iron Man (1994), Fantastic Four (1994), The Incredible Hulk (1996), and Silver Surfer (1998). Shows that came out before or after like Spider-Man & His Amazing Friends or X-Men: Evolution and The Spectacular Spider-Man don't count. Not every single Marvel cartoon falls under the MAU category. It's just like how Super Friends isn't seen as apart of the DC Animated Universe, under Bruce Timm. TMC1982 (talk) 5:14 p.m., 14 June 2008 (UTC)

Featured list removal candidates/List of X-Men episodes
Hi, I've nominated List of X-Men episodes for a featured list removal candidate. Please feel free to comment on the discussion available here. « Milk's Favorite Cøøkie 22:24, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

User:U2 is alternative rock not using move tab
Hi. The user is not able to move the page with the move tab because the account was created last night, thus not yet in the autoconfirmed group (required for moving). Anyway, he’s a sockpuppet. &mdash; H92 (t · c · no) 14:32, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
 * thanks for the note. -- Gman 124 talk 14:33, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
 * No problem. &mdash; H92 (t · c · no) 14:48, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

FYI on en dashes
Just an FYI on en dashes; converting them from – to – (to Unicode) is not necessary, as both display the same thing. Gary King</b> ( talk ) 05:25, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
 * OK I will remember that for the future, thanks. -- Gman 124 t 23:32, 26 June 2008 (UTC)

List of Boston Celtics head coaches
Why did you revert my edits? I fixed the article. And unless it is fully fixed, there is no need to have a link in Boston Celtics, because the current link has more accurate information. And why did you delete all the information of the head coaches on Boston Celtics? ●  8  ~  Hype  @ 10:16, 26 June 2008 (UTC)

Links in sortable tables
In sortable tables all words in one column should be linked because when you start sorting by different columns, the delinked word may appear first. It's very common especially at WP:FLC to require that all instances of the same word be linked in sortable tables.-- Crzycheetah 06:50, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
 * alright. -- Gman 124 talk 17:36, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

FLCs
Hey. As one of WP:FLCs biggest contributors, I was hoping to ask you to revisit some (or all!) of the lists you've reviewed recently and see if any concerns you might have raised have subsequently been addressed. FLCs are gaining a lot of interest and plenty of comments but not many supports or opposes - while the "four supports" minimum has been removed, lists still need community consensus for them to be promoted. Thanks for your contributions so far, keep up the great work. The Rambling Man (talk) 16:51, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

FLRC of List of X-Men episodes
Hi, Gman. Just a quick reminder to sign your comments (even simple ticks) at Featured list removal candidates/List of X-Men episodes. It just helps for checking to see if edits on the episode list have been made in relation to comments at the FLRC page. If I see your sig, I know it's being worked on and will probably keep it open longer than the minimum of two weeks. Regards, Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email) 06:24, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Ok I will do that from now on, thank you. -- Gman 124 talk 16:30, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

G8 and talk pages of redirects...
Talk pages of redirects, such as Talk:Aliens: The Computer Game (Activision), don't qualify for CSD G8. They should be either left alone or redirected to match the article. Cheers. --<i style="color:green;">lifebaka</i> (Talk - Contribs) 14:12, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
 * why not? I would like to know which consensus there is that prevents talk pages of redirects that have no disscussions to be deleted. -- Gman 124 talk 14:20, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

Thanks!
Thank you for your participation in Featured list candidates/List of Twin Peaks episodes. The article was promoted to a featured list. Cheers! (SUDUSER)85 04:48, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Deleted Articles
Hi there, I had a few attempts at an article deleted. I read up on it and it seems the main problem is that its not notable. Im trying to revise it and would appreciate any tips you might have. Heres my revised article: Thanks, Matt. Drkostan (talk) 16:45, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

Medical Futures Inc
Medical Futures Inc. is a niche pharmaceutical company that sells both pharmaceutical and natural therapeutic products into the gastrointestinal marketplace.

They are the sole Canadian distributor of Florastor (generic name saccgarintces biykarduu lyo) the word’s number one probiotic that has proven efficacy in treating and preventing diarrhea from various causes.

Press Releases:

Medical Futures Inc has licensed a new biologic agent for Ulcerative Colitis MUTAFLOR for the North American market.

Anesiva and Medical Futures Announce Exclusive Marketing and Distribution Agreement for Zingo™ in Canada. Zingo™ is a needle free system that delivers lidocaine powder to the skin to provide topical, local analgesia.
 * Thanks alot for your help, its very much appreciated. On a side note, should I be posting here or on my talk page? It is a relatively small company, doing $10 million in sales. There are several publications and news releases involving them brining new medications/products to the north american market. Many of which are very popular such as florastor which is the words best selling probiotic. So if I put more publications and write more about the company, it might have a better chance of being "notable?" It seems you have to be famous in order to have a wiki ariticle on a company. Thanks again. Drkostan (talk) 19:23, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
 * I used to go back to the talk page of the user that left me a message, but a few weeks earlier I found the following Template which I placed on your talk page:  so that people that left me a message can come back and keep the discussion on one place. You can place your Information about the company on your User page or on a Subpage (see How to create user subpages) then move it to the article page when you think it is ready. Also there are pages like TechRepublic and MovieTome that aren't that big, but still exist, since everything in those is properly sourced and has a references and external link section. --  Gman 124 talk 20:09, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Also see Your first article for more info. -- Gman 124 talk 22:38, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for your message.
Lulubon (talk) 20:53, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
 * no problem. You can leave these messages too, see Welcoming committee-- Gman 124 talk 20:55, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

now that is a sik welcome message man
Cheers! :D Jumpjumphigher (talk) 21:26, 7 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Thanks man, much appreciated. -- Gman 124 talk 21:39, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

List of Boston Bruins head coaches FLC
Hey Gman, could you add a support/oppose/further comments here please? Thanks very much! The Rambling Man (talk) 08:19, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

Thanks
It was nice of you to post the welcome message :) --FZR2000 (talk) 17:07, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
 * no problem. You can leave these messages too, see Welcoming committee -- Gman 124 talk 17:08, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

Request for Help, please
Greetings Gman124,

Nice to meet you.

Could you kindly help me translate these 3 passages into the unique and wonderful Punjabi language? Please.

Content
 * "Receiving the Holy Spirit, evidenced by speaking in tongues, is the guarantee of our inheritance of the Kingdom of Heaven".


 * "Water baptism is the sacrament for the remission of sins and for regeneration. The baptism takes place in natural living water, such as the river, sea, or spring. The Baptist, whom already has received baptism of water and the Holy Spirit, conducts the baptism in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ. And the person receiving the baptism should be completely immersed in water with head bowed and face downward".


 * "The sacrament of feet washing enables one to have a part with the Lord Jesus. It also serves as a constant reminder that one should have love, holiness, humility, forgiveness and service. Every person who has received water baptism should have their feet washed in the name of Jesus Christ. Mutual feet washing may be practiced whenever is appropriate".

Your help would be very Gratefully Appreciated (just try your best effort). --Jose77 (talk) 08:12, 9 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Hi Gman124, you mentioned that you had difficulty translating the word "mutant". The actual word was "mutual". Therefore "mutual feetwashing" means feetwashing that is performed by two or more parties towards each other (ie, we both wash each other's feet). --Jose77 (talk) 23:46, 9 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Here is a simplified version of those three passages. Please feel free to ask me if there are any terminology which you have difficulty translating to Punjabi. Just try your best effort.

Content
 * "Receiving the Holy Spirit is the guarantee of our inheritance of the Kingdom of Heaven. Speaking in tongues (ie. speaking in other languages) is the evidence of having received the Holy Spirit".


 * "Baptism in water is the rite (religious observance) for the forgiveness of sins and for regeneration (to be spiritually reborn again). The baptism takes place in natural living water, such as the river, sea, or spring water. The person performing the Baptism, whom had already received baptism of water and the Holy Spirit previously, conducts the baptism in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ. And the person receiving the baptism should be completely submerged in water with head bowed and facing downward".


 * "The rite (religious observance) of Washing of the Feet enables a person to belong to the Lord Jesus. It also serves as a constant reminder that one should have love, holiness, humility (humbleness), forgiveness and service. Every person who has already received water baptism ought to have their feet washed in the name of Jesus Christ. Each person may wash each other's feet whenever it is suitable or appropriate".

--Jose77 (talk) 02:20, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

Thankyou very much

 * THANKYOU SO MUCH Gman124  for your Excellent Translation effort!


 * I am very very Grateful.


 * May You Be Blessed!


 * If you want any of your favourite articles to be translated into the Chinese language, then I would certainly be glad help you.


 * Yours Sincerely, From --Jose77 (talk) 23:41, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

New Posts
Gman thank-you for your welcome message. Can I just ask a question I have posted some tennis updates on various rising stars profiles as I have a keen interest. I have also posted a few external links to a site called Information Tennis which is a fantastic resource website for any tennis fan that will give visitors the chance to learn more information on players. Having posted this on Laura Robson's page it was up for a few days and now deleted, yet its clearly a good and valid link and i have contributed to the content of Laura Robson. —Preceding unsigned comment added by DanEvans1 (talk • contribs) 13:22, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

Thanks!
Thank you for your kind welcome, hope we can work with each other in the future [: ABQster (talk) 17:42, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
 * alright. -- Gman 124 talk 17:43, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

Thnk you
Thanx for the welcome 18:19, 9 July 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Madddogdj (talk • contribs) 18:22, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
 * No problem, next plese sign your comment. -- Gman 124 talk 18:23, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

Request for Help (continued)
Greetings Gman124,

Could you also help me translate these passages into the brilliant and fantastic Punjabi language? Please.


 * "The Sabbath day, the seventh day of the week (Saturday), is a Holy Day, blessed and sanctified by God. It is to be observed under the Lord's grace for the commemoration of God's creation and salvation and with the hope of eternal rest in the life to come".


 * "Salvation is given by the grace of God through faith. Believers must rely on the Holy Spirit to pursue holiness, to honour God, and to love humanity".


 * "The Second Coming of Jesus will take place on the Last Day when He descends from heaven to judge the world: the righteous will receive eternal life, while the wicked will be eternally condemned".

Your help would be very very Gratefully Appreciated, Thankyou very much. --Jose77 (talk) 00:05, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Okay, but it's going to take me a few days though, I'm kind of busy in real life and won't have time for at two-three more days. I'll try to do it as soon as possible. -- Gman 124 talk 00:21, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

Your rollback request
Hello Gman124, I have granted your account rollback in accordance with your request. Just remember that rollback should only be used for reverting vandalism, and that misuse (either by using them to revert good-faith edits or to revet-war) can lead to its removal. For practice, you may be interested in seeing New admin school/Rollback. Good luck. Acalamari 23:50, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks. -- Gman 124 talk 23:53, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Of course. :) You're welcome. Acalamari 23:54, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

Talk page message
Does this mean you didn't like my edit? lol Send me info on that adopt a user thing please :) Infero Veritas (talk) 20:11, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

Welcome Template
Hi Gman. I had a question. On User:Kcoppin's talk page, you put up a very nice Welcome Template. I would just like to know what template that is, because it looked very cool. Thanks for your help. NuclearWarfare (talk) 20:35, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
 * I used the following  (created by User:Malinaccier) and made a minor edit to it by putting my talk link and saved at one of my user pages  Gman 124 talk 22:59, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your help :)NuclearWarfare (talk) 00:49, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

Another question for ya....
Is there a specific way to go about joining a portal or wikiproject? I read the stuff on the link on the welcome thing you sent me, but that really didn't help much. One project just had a list that you could add your name too, but it would seem to me that there would be more involved than that with joining a project. Any thoughts or pointers? Infero Veritas (talk) 20:25, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

Thankyou very much



 * THANKYOU SO MUCH Gman124 for your Wonderful Translation help, time and effort!


 * I am very very Grateful.


 * May you Prosper and succeed in life!


 * Yours Sincerely, From --Jose77 (talk) 04:49, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

Regarding the previous request I placed on your Punjabi Wikipedia talkpage, I must admit there was some overlap between the passages. So instead, could you help me translate these three passages into the brilliant and fantastic Punjabi language? Please.

Content


 * "Jesus Christ, the Word who became flesh, died on the cross for the redemption of sinners, resurrected on the third day and ascended to heaven. He is the only Saviour of mankind, the Creator of the heavens and earth, and the only true God".


 * "The Holy Bible, consisting of the Old and New Testaments, is inspired by God, the only scriptural truth, and the standard for Christian living".


 * "The church, established by the Lord Jesus Christ, through the Holy Spirit during the time of the 'latter rain', is the restored true church of the Apostolic time".

Your help would be very Gratefully Appreciated, just try your best effort. --Jose77 (talk) 04:49, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

Umm...weird
So...when I went to look at your userpage...it was rather odd looking. Were you messing with it today? or am I just going crazy?Infero Veritas (talk) 19:35, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

Guess I'm going crazy..it didn't look anything like a userpage..oh well, it happensInfero Veritas (talk) 00:22, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

Barnstar Award

 * Thanks man. -- Gman 124 talk 18:14, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Arena Football League Newsletter - October 2008
→ Please direct all enquiries to the WikiProject talk page. → This newsletter/release was delivered by ENewsBot · 10:54, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Arena Football League Newsletter - November 2008
→ Please direct all enquiries to the WikiProject talk page. → This newsletter/release was delivered by ENewsBot · 06:03, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

Spider-Man season article cast list
Hi, I realise you created the Spider-Man season article Neogenic Nightmare, and as I know you are aware, that I recently created one for The Sins of the Fathers, similar to yours. All I wanted to ask, is where the hell did you find the cast list? I had to work it out for myself, and I'm not even completely sure I did it 100% correct, what source did you use? SpideyFan09 12:30, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
 * There were episode articles for the entire Neogenic Nightmare season and all these pages had cast sections, so I just took the cast names from those redirects and removed the duplicates. I just looked at the individual episode articles at following link to make sure I got everyone. --  Gman 124 talk 17:40, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Oh, cheers mate. I'll get that cast list down as soon as pos. SpideyFan09 17:45, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Hi, I'm now currently writing the first season in my sandbox. SpideyFan09 19:02, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Arena Football League Newsletter - December 2008
→ Please direct all enquiries to the WikiProject talk page. → This newsletter/release was delivered by ENewsBot · 23:46, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
 * }

Request for Help, please
Greetings Gman124,

Could you kindly help me translate this passage into the superb and splendid Punjabi language? Please.

Content


 * "The Holy Communion is the sacrament to commemorate the death of the Lord Jesus Christ. It enables us to partake of the flesh and blood of our Lord and to be in communion with Him so that we can have eternal life and be raised on the Last Day. This sacrament should be held as often as possible. Only one unleavened bread and grape juice is used".

Your help would be very Gratefully Appreciated, just try your best effort. --Jose77 (talk) 22:35, 6 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Thankyou very much Gman124 for your superb translation help!
 * If you want your favourite article to be translated into the Chinese or Minnan language, then I would be glad to help you. --Jose77 (talk) 23:35, 18 December 2008 (UTC)

Barnstar

 * Thanks! -- Gman 124 talk 04:36, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Arena Football League Newsletter - January 2009
{| class="navbox collapsible collapsed" style="text-align: left; border: 2px; margin-top: 0.2em;" ! colspan="2" valign="middle" style="width: 60%; border: 3px black solid; background-color: #FFFFFF; padding: 1em;" | The WikiProject Arena Football League newsletter  Issue VI — January 2009 → Please direct all enquiries to the WikiProject talk page. → This newsletter/release was delivered by ENewsBot · 11:27, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

Featured list candidates/WCW Hall of Fame
Thanks for your comments, I believe I have addressed it now.-- TRU    CO   16:20, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the reminder. -- Gman 124 talk 16:48, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

Re:Can one editor nominate two lists around the same time
Generally, I don't care if people have multiple nominations going (however, one user had 18 at one point and that was kind of pushing it), so the answer is yes. -- Scorpion <sup style="color:black;">0422  20:14, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks for clarifying. -- Gman 124 talk 20:41, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

Interlinking
Hey Gman124,

Thanks for the warm welcome. As you can see, I am the epitome of Wikipedian noobs. I'm attempting to make the fiber converter article as informative as possible and trying not to break any rules. Apparently I overdid the interlinking, so I beleive I fixed that. I didn't want to yank the banner though without an OK from someone. It seems as though someone deleted all of my network applications (not sure why), too. Any advice for optimizing my article would be greatly appreciated. Thanks.

IMC Networks (talk) 22:31, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

Spider-Man
Hello. :) Since you have been involved in editing the article Spider-Man, I wanted to let you know that we have nominated the article for "Good Article" status. You can view the review page, and if there is anything you can do to make the article better, please do so. :) There are a number of concerns to be addressed and some work to be done, so pitch in if you are able, make any suggestions that you think might be helpful, or at least just be there for moral support. :) BOZ (talk) 00:44, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

File:Gregg Popovich.jpg
WP:NFCC is pretty clear about images like File:Gregg Popovich.jpg - if someone can create a free alternative without unreasonable difficulty, it's replaceable. And in the case of an NBA head coach, who makes at least 82 scheduled public appearances a season, not to mention the meets-and-greets and other public engagements on non-gamedays, they are the very definition of someone whose image can be created freely. And I'm not sure how you get the idea that the use of the image isn't a copyright violation. You're using an image copyrighted to someone else without their permission or license - of course you're infringing on copyright. --Mosmof (talk) 00:50, 17 February 2009 (UTC)


 * It's still not that easy to find an image of a coach even if currently alive. If you look at the Category:National Basketball Association coaches at the Commons there only like 7 pictures of coaches that are with free license. So what would be the point of deleting the image until, there is one uploaded at commons of someplace else. Though I wouldn't really mind it, if it gets deleted, also. It's just hard to see the work I do get removed that's all. -- Gman 124 talk 03:26, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I didn't say it was easy, just that it's not insurmountably difficult. They publish schedules for all NBA teams, you know? Plus, one way to encourage free images is to not allow copyrighted images where a free image could feasibly created. And there is a dissonance of sorts when you call uploading an image "work", when you're ignoring the intellectual property rights of someone who makes his living by licensing his photographs. In any case, it's all a moot point - Wikipedia's policies on pictures of living public people is pretty clear. --Mosmof (talk) 14:01, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

Kristin Kreuk
I reverted your addition of the Lana image to the Kristin Kreuk article. Per the fair use criteria, if a free alternative exists then it must be used. Since a free alternative exists always for living people, all people articles require free images.  BIGNOLE     (Contact me)  23:56, 19 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Ok. -- Gman 124 talk 23:56, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

Seinfeld
Hi Gman124,

I invite you to respond to Talk:List_of_Seinfeld_episodes. Clerks. (talk) 17:15, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I have responded at the Seinfeld episode talk page. -- Gman 124 talk 20:40, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

Talk:india
Can you explain what you are trying to do with the archives of Talk:India ? I assume that this edit was just an error (and not vandalism, as I initially thought), but am still not clear why you are merging previous archives. Cheers. Abecedare (talk) 21:56, 2 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Some of the archives on Talk:India were very short, so I decided to merge them tegether. Since the archives aren't accessed that much time anyway, so why not merge them? Also it would greatly facilitate searching the archives because the number of links needed to be opened and searched would be greatly reduced. Mainly i just don't think there should be any short archives. -- Gman 124 talk 22:06, 2 March 2009 (UTC)


 * One problem is that this breaks all the internal links to archival talks, i.e. comments on the talk page that refer to specific previous archived discussions. This is relatively common on Talk:India since some issues keep cropping up repeatedly.
 * Of course, I have no problem, if future archives are set to be 190K instead of 90K. Would it be possible for you to undo the merges, or is it too much work now ? Abecedare (talk) 22:16, 2 March 2009 (UTC)


 * I have placed the tag to request speedy delete(per G8) after I had merged the archive. I think the empty archives might already have been deleted. --  Gman 124 talk 22:19, 2 March 2009 (UTC)


 * yeah they have been deleted already [. -- [[User:Gman124| Gman 124 ]]talk 22:22, 2 March 2009 (UTC)


 * That's ok then. It would have helped if the issue had been discussed first, but since we are talking about archived and not current discussions, and no actual information is lost, it's not worth spending too much of our time on this issue. Happy editing! Abecedare (talk) 22:24, 2 March 2009 (UTC)


 * If you really want the archives to be back the way they were then maybe they could be recreated. I did leave a link to the pages that i merged see this. So whatever I pasted at once, at every merge will just need to be coppied and repasted back. -- Gman 124 talk 22:35, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes, I did see those edit-summaries, which made me realize that you were making intentional changes, and were not another drive-by vandal (sorry about this edit summary). But the issue is too minor to waste either your or my editing time unwrapping all the merges. I am fine with the new status quo. Cheers. Abecedare (talk) 22:45, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Ok. -- Gman 124 talk 22:47, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

Thanks.
Glad you worked with me to fix up those old archives, when they get too big, the wikipedia page formatting falls apart; you may wish to consider going to 150K, not 200k, but your efforts are appreciated. Good on ya, keep it up. ThuranX (talk) 22:32, 3 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Alright, and thank you. -- Gman 124 talk 23:16, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

Toon Disney
Toon Disney is defunct, it was rebranded and renamed. Therefore its more appropriate to have a section of the Disney XD article marked history, about Toon Disney. Defunct channels and programming blocks don't need separate articles. Please don't unmerge it again. TomCat4680 (talk) 16:41, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
 * You are free to propose a merge, but just because it is defunt doesn't mean you should just go and merge everything. -- Gman 124 talk 16:42, 8 March 2009 (UTC)


 * I disagree, the merge page clearly states that if you find a separate page is unneccessary, just merge it yourself.TomCat4680 (talk) 16:45, 8 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Have you even looked at Help:Merging and moving pages it says "If the merger is controversial, however, you may find your merger reverted, and as with all other edits, edit wars should be avoided. If you are uncertain of the merger's appropriateness, or believe it might be controversial, or your merge ends up reverted, you can propose it on either or both of the affected pages". -- Gman 124 talk 16:47, 8 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The same section says selective paste mergers don't need a consensus. This isn't controversial, I kept all of the relevant information. Please continue this discussion at Talk:Disney XD.TomCat4680 (talk) 16:51, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:blue; background-color:AliceBlue; border-width:1px; text-align:left; padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">

TomCat4680 (talk) has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

Vandalism
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. You aren't an administrator so don't send me fake warnings. I stopped reverting. Impersonating an administrator is grounds for permanent block.TomCat4680 (talk) 17:46, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
 * You don't have to be a admin to report someone if you still don't believe that I reported you see Administrators'_noticeboard/Edit_warring. And also leaving a message isn't vandalism. -- Gman 124 talk 17:49, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
 * And I onlyt sent you one warning saying that I have repoted you. And I never said I was an admin. -- Gman 124 talk 17:52, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Talk:Solar System
Hi. I'm trying to get a handle on what utility you gained by consolidating all of the Talk:Solar System archives. It seems, on the surface, that you just created some really big archive pages, rather than leaving the small ones. I'm sure you have some well thought out plan, I just wanted to know the scoop. Thanks. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 17:01, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
 * They were short archives, so I merged them. I just think it would be better in searching the archives (if someone ever needs to) because the number of links needed to be opened and searched would be greatly reduced. Though, mainly i just don't think there should be any short archives. They aren't accessed much anyway. Is there like some sort of rule against merging archives, if there's anything wrong with merging archives then I won't merge them again. Thank You. -- Gman 124 talk 18:38, 9 March 2009 (UTC)


 * I'm just old fashioned when it comes to article/archive size. 32k is usually a good size for all purposes (and certainly is not short).  I think this only really comes into play nowadays with editing by mobile users - but archives should not need to be edited, just viewed anyway.  My brain starts to hurt when I think of the prospect of scrolling through a 150k archive, but that's just me. To save yourself some work in the future, I'd suggest that you look at the HBC Archive Indexerbot.  -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 18:58, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Ok from now on I won't merge those archive that are more than or around 30K, but could the ones that only contain like 4 or 5 messages, like the one that was here still be merged? Those just seem a little small even compared to 32k archives becasue that was just around 6k. -- Gman 124 talk 21:01, 9 March 2009 (UTC)


 * There's no hard rule either way. I'd say merging small archives is fine.  I just think that the effort can be saved by using the archive index bot if the real issue is indexing several archive pages.  -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 22:15, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Ok, and thanks -- Gman 124 talk 22:27, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

Multiple accounts
While not generally recommended, there is no prohibiition as long as the multiple accounts are not being used improperly (i.e. to attempt to bypass the 3RR rule or to continue to edit under one account when the other account has been blocked for violations or to use more than one account within a discussion in an attempt to make the appearance of consensus tip a certain way). I have been very forthright that both accounts are the same person as I work to divest my watchlist from extranious listings and move all such edits to the other account. -- The Red Pen of Doom  14:40, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Well I was just curious, I know we can have a bot account, but need authorization for it first. I was just wasn't sure about a non bot account. and thanks for replying back. -- Gman 124 talk 19:21, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I was just wondering which edits do you mean, when you say that "I work to divest my watchlist from extranious listings and move all such edits to the other account." and why do you edit same pages with two accounts. -- Gman 124 talk 20:33, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I just checked Doppelganger_account which stats that doppleganger accounts should not be used for editing. -- Gman 124 talk 14:29, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

[Untitled Section]
Thanks Gman124 for the welcome. I will be in touch if I need help. Thanks for the reference pages. Bigweeman. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bigweeboy (talk • contribs) 19:54, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
 * ok. -- Gman 124 talk 20:29, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

Space Ghost, Street Sharks, and Beetleborgs
When I added the information about the film adaptations of Space Ghost, Big Bad Beetleborgs, and Street Sharks it was intended to be an April Fool's Day joke to liven the place up a bit. I was going to post it for April Fool's and then revert the edits today if they hadn't already been. Sorry for the confusion, but I was in a bit of an April Fool's mood at the moment. PF4Eva (talk) 21:52, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
 * ok, I didn't know that. I just thought you actually meant to put that there. -- Gman 124 talk 01:23, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

eh
i splitted the iron man article, but man it's hard getting information on it. Do you think we could have two original airdates, one for CA one for US. please continue discussion on the duscussion page Talk:List of Iron Man: Armored Adventures episodesIAmTheCoinMan (talk) 18:07, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
 * can you help me out with Template:Episode list/Iron Man: Armored Adventures/doc
 * Ok. did you already create the Template:Episode list/Iron Man: Armored Adventures somewhere else. I think we could change the episode list template to have US_airdate field and CA_airadete field. I will do it in a day or two. -- Gman 124 talk 18:33, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
 * I sorta figured it out. Check it. IAmTheCoinMan (talk) 18:47, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Do you think we really need the plot bit?IAmTheCoinMan (talk) 18:47, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
 * I have started the episode list template here. ON this I have changed OriginalAirDate to CANAirDate and AltDate to USAirDate-- Gman 124 talk 18:49, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
 * okay cool, do we need plot tho? IAmTheCoinMan (talk) 19:20, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
 * I replied on Talk:List of Iron Man: Armored Adventures episodes -- Gman 124 talk 19:24, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

Re: Comedy Wikiprojects
The move has been taken following discussions with the Simpsons WikiProject. It was decided that the Comedy WikiProject should not tag the episodes because:

a) People from WP:COMEDY had little to do with editing the articles. Nearly all of it was done by WP:SIMPSONS. It was seen that WP:COMEDY was simply tagging articles to increase the number of GAs, FAs and FLs it had.

b) WP:SIMPSONS is a descendant WikiProject from WP:COMEDY. As a result, it is more under their control that WP:COMEDYs.

As a result, it has been decided to de-tag WP:COMEDY from articles about comedy episodes which are already covered by descendant WikiProjects, such as WP:SEINFELD, WP:FG, WP:FUTURAMA and so on. Episodes which are not covered by a WikiProject dedicate to the series, such as 30 Rock, will still be covered by WP:COMEDY. ISD (talk) 18:39, 15 April 2009 (UTC)


 * OK thanks for clarifying. -- Gman 124 talk 18:55, 15 April 2009 (UTC)


 * It probably should. However, I'm not a member of the TV WikiProject so I do not feel comfortable about removing that WikiProject without letting them know first. ISD (talk) 07:23, 16 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Ok, thanks again. -- Gman 124 talk 13:35, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

Talk:List of South Park episodes/Archive 3
moved from user talk Ikip:

just wanted to tell you that the bot archives and moves to the next archive when the archive passes a certain number of kilobyles (for south park it's 200) not on number of entries. You can see here that archive 2 is way past 200 K (or 200,000 bytes). Gman 124 talk 23:26, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Should I revert my changes? Thanks for letting me know? Ikip (talk) 00:57, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
 * no, i don't think you have revert it, it's not like the thread that you moved to archive 2 was that big anyway. I just wanted to let you know. plus the bot already archived some disscusion at archive 3. Gman 124 talk 01:00, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
 * I saw this just now, thank you so much for letting me know. I remember you from the merge discussion, but don't recall off the top of my head which you supported. Regardless, have a great week, enjoy the last few hours of sunday. I will watch your page for more comments. Ikip (talk) 01:05, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
 * ok, see ya around the wiki. You have a great week too. (I had voted to create season pages and merge stub ep articles) Gman 124 talk 01:09, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

Welcome
Do you have a welcome to wikipidea yet if you dont have i send to you.Money game (talk 02:43, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Yes, I archived all of my talk. Gman 124 talk 14:58, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

Don't forget to check the "show changes" button
You edited X-Men (film series) from an old diff, which undid a formatting tweak I did. Don't forget to check the "show changes" button before saving your edits; it can be helpful to see what all you're restoring when working from old diffs. EVula // talk // &#9775;  // 16:07, 15 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Ok. Sorry about that. -- Gman 124 talk 16:09, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

Star Trek Archive
Most were stale, or not about improving the article. Stuff about fans or a fork lift say nothing about how to improve the article, which is the point of a talk page. You have to prune to get new growth. Darrenhusted (talk) 18:06, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

Final Fantasy XIII - Gallery Images and PNG Files
I understand you're requesting further information upon the Licensing, this I can provide by extending their permissions. Only where have you put the speedy deletion tags? If I cant find them I can not add ((hangon)) if I can not find the tage on the 4 files. They have been added to an article, this was yesterday, their Licensing is that they have been released on the Internet to Publisise Square-Enix's upcoming Flagship title of the "Fabula Nova Crystallis" compilation and series. The use of these images is fully legal and it is legal to distribute them in this way. Wikipedia is a non-profit organisation website, so it is fully legal to be used on the website and by users. Unless wikipedia has a destinctive lack of trust. The images are within a Public Domain, it's easy to find them on the internet by many free image use websites. Furthermore they are being used within the Main FFXIII article within a Gallery formation under section = "Characters", this is why i originally uploaded the files for this intention, to allow people to give reference to the upcoming characters of the game with full images aswell as thumbnails in a gallery.

Could you please contact me for further details as to how I can attain a correct licensing display in which to insert into the File descriptions so I may put across that the Images are free use due to them being within the public domain and they are being used in an article.

Please Respond Promptly.

The Cosmo 12:55, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

You want me to list all the sources, they did'nt come from the same public domains, it will take a while to locate where they came from. Plus I'll add their reason for existance, they exist to give people instant visual reference to the Stated characters of the upcoming FFXIII, thats no problem. comment added by XCosmoX (talk • contribs) The Cosmo 17:24, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

Thank you, only, it is a free image, surely images from Public Domains are free. —Preceding unsigned comment added by XCosmoX (talk • contribs) The Cosmo 17:24, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

This I know, but these images have been released into the public domain through various media to publisise and be made available. These are not from game content (although the characters have been generated for game content) These images have not, they were captured for use such as this. The Cosmo 17:24, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

Oh I think I understand now, It's the work of Square-Enix yes, all i need is the code in which to change the Licensing claim, as a "Non-Free 3D Art" as the images are 3D (graphically speaking). —Preceding unsigned comment added by XCosmoX (talk • contribs) The Cosmo 17:24, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

Excellent, yes, I often forget to sign posts. I am currently a Wikipedia novice (if it is not obvious enough) But I'd love to contribute more, images is something I'd really like to get my head round because of all the licensing. Are you sure I should License them as Promotional, Non-Free 3D seemed more approprite. The Cosmo 17:24, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

Then again your's does seem a lot more appropriate, I shall apply the new license tag and sources. Could you please remove the speedy deletion tags from the images and my talk page aswell.



Thank You! The Cosmo 17:35, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

I think I further misunderstood, you deleted the 4 previous files which i personally changes the image to "PLEASE DELETE" and you did, Great thanks, they were cluttering up Wikipedia, but I have been refering to these http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Final_Fantasy_XIII_-_Lightning*.png http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Snow_Villiers*.png http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Final_Fantasy_XIII_-_Oerba_Dia_Vanille*.png http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Sazh_Katzroy*.png.

I will soon be getting some sleep, that may help. Could you also remove the non-free curiosity tags from the 4 files aswell please, that will be most helpful as other administrators will not be tempted to delete them under supersition. The Cosmo 17:41, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

Thank You! You've been very helpful, I feel like I have attained something now by editing the FFXIII page successfully and uploading Highly detailed images. A lot of Square-Enix fans are going to be amazed when they see them. Also this is a leap in my Wikipedia Crafting Knowledge Thanks. The Cosmo 18:03, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

Spiderman 4 Page
Dude, why did you get rid of my Spiderman 4 article? I thought I did pretty good. It was more organized than that future paragraph on the Spiderman film series page. Valkyrie Red- June 9, 2009
 * It hasn't even entered production yet. and the article is very poorly written and the References section is all jumbeled up and for ehich lines are they for?. and the correct name is Spider-Man 4 not Spiderman 4. If you want to create it write wait till the production starts so that there will be enough info for it to need a separate page. For now I think it should just remain on the series page. Also Start it under correct name next time. Also don't delete the entire section from the Series page. Gman 124 talk 21:26, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

Spider-man 4 Response
Dude, okay, i made some mistakes, but cut me some slack. It was my first major article that I read. Can you tell me what was wrong with the article. And tell me everything, even the minor things, that need changing. Valkyrie Red- June 9, 2009

Seinfeld (season 2)
Just notifying you that I've re-nominated Seinfeld (season 2) for FLC.-- Music 26/  11  14:19, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

Undoing of header / archive tidying
I'm not sure what this was in aid of (the use of edit summaries for non-vandalism reverts is usually considered non-optional for editors in good standing, as I'm sure you must be aware by now), but it wasn't productive. The point of talk pages is that they should be easy to use, which means (a) that editors shouldn't have to scroll through too much text - either when reading, which means archives shouldn't be dozens of pages long, or when editing, which means headers shouldn't be over a page long). In addition, your edit broke the archiving chronology by moving the bot back onto Archive 1 when Archive 2 had some text in it. I've reverted this; if you have any questions I'll be happy to answer them. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 10:38, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

Thank
For "Welcome" tag. Arafael (talk) 04:40, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

Notification
nominated List of Heroes episodes for featured list removal here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured list criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks; editors may declare to "Keep" or "Remove" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mateyahoy (talk • contribs) 14:27, November 7, 2009

Not sure if I missed something.
I entered a couple of videos that seems to be more beneficial to the topic and had a good wealth of information sure a small plug was on the front but the overall video was more beneficial to the reader. I read the wiki guidelines and did not think it was out of line unless I missed something?

Independent videos are going to be hard to find due to the cost to put them together. Wikipedia needs to figure out what to do regarding video links because its the future. If you spend some time on the Google Forum they plan on pushing the videos and blogs hard.

So is anything from any company on earth not allowed to add information on Wikipedia? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Simplejacktard (talk • contribs) 19:27, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

help understanding Secondary Source examples and "notability"
Hi Gman124,

I was curious to get a clear simple idea of what a reliable secondary source really is? I was under the impression it was direct quotes from writers or authors with links or book references. Also, how does one go about showing that a topic has "notability"? Seems a bit subjective at a glance. Your thoughts would be appreciated.

thanks! Repkea (talk) 23:00, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

I'd like to know where there is proof that Jimmy Sullivan was married. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Allcreatures (talk • contribs) 20:40, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Hera Pheri
Template:Hera Pheri has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 22:45, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Species Films
Template:Species Films has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 23:00, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

Template deletion
Thanks I use a script to help me tag these and sometimes it doesn't complete its task. I'll make sure that a proper discussion is listed. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 03:03, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
 * ok Gman 124 talk 03:03, 18 February 2010 (UTC)