User talk:Gmfreeman619

Checkuser review
as administrators must not loosen or remove this block without consulting a CheckUser(CU block} due to the confidential nature of the data that led to this block. &mdash; Coffee //  have a cup  //  beans  // 22:49, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
 * I don't understand the request. The block was not a checkuser block. It was a block by a checkuser, which is not the same thing. Second, what do you mean by "the confidential nature of the data that led to this block"? Finally, why are you even asking for a check? Is there some reason you feel the user should be unblocked? Several CheckUsers have already checked this account, including, the blocking administrator. For these reasons, the request is .--Bbb23 (talk) 01:08, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
 * I had no way of knowing the account had been checked by multiple checkusers. I was merely asking for someone to do exactly what you did: clarify the block for me. I assumed the block happened in result of checkuser data, which is the point of the "confidential nature" term. I don't know of any other way to ping you all, since there isn't a checkuser unblock type template/ping checkuser template that I'm aware of. &mdash; Coffee //  have a cup  //  beans  // 01:13, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
 * No big deal. Thanks for clarifying. I think the simplest thing to do in the future would be to talk to the CheckUser who imposed the block, in this instance Jpgordon. If you look at his Talk page, you'll see that someone already asked him about this block.--Bbb23 (talk) 01:43, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

I still haven't done anything wrong. I would like you to review the block.:::