User talk:Gmitros

Speedy deletion nomination of Arrow Storage Products


A tag has been placed on Arrow Storage Products, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Rymatz (talk) 15:00, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

Arrow Storage Products
I saw your question on Talk:Arrow Storage Products. The problem with the entries you wrote at Arrow Storage Products is that all they use are primary sources (i.e. statements made by the company or its employees), which alone aren't enough to make a subject notable, since these sources usually cannot be trusted to make unbiased claims. Wikipedia articles are built on secondary sources (i.e. accounts by journalists, web portals), and without them these articles wouldn't be verifiable. I suggest you take a look at WP:RS and WP:CORP and then see how to write and properly source this article and should you write it at all. After all if, by exhausting all available sources on the Internet, the only Wikipedia entry you can come up with is an article listing the company's products and linking to company's official website and LinkedIn page for references, then this company likely isn't yet notable enough to be on Wikipedia. Rymatz (talk) 22:08, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
 * The other problem is that the wording of the article was not neutral. "Find the shed/ building that fits your needs" is advertising. In fact, almost the whole thing sounds promotional. Please look at WP:SPAM and WP:COI, and also WP:RS about reliable sources. We've no quarrel with Arrow Storage as an entity. But to have an article here, it, and the article about it, must fit with our policies and their requirements. Peridon (talk) 22:16, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

I hope this rewrite works for Wikipedia Gmitros