User talk:Gmoney484

MAGS Observatory and RASNZ
I note that you have once again removed the paragraph in question from Mount Albert Grammar School. If your assertion does turn out to be correct then the information that you are trying to delete would still be of historic interest; it would be preferable to change the paragraph into the past-tense and add dates to it. Also, are you aware of WP:COI? -Arb. (talk) 13:44, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

Mount Albert Grammar School
Please do not remove tags from articles unless the issue they highlight has been resolved. The Observatory section is completely unreferenced (there does not appear to be any mention of MAGS on the MicroFUN site so I have converted it to an external link; if that is a mistake please provide a link to the correct page). If you are interested in which facts need references see this version. -Arb. (talk) 14:56, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

Where are the references for the section on the School Farm? or for the Philips Aquatic Center? or for the schools history? Are you going to request citations for those sections as well? Be consistent. All the information you request is on the schools website. If you follow the Microfun Workshop link from the main page I have referenced, you will see me smiling to you on Monday, Session 2. They haven't updated the rest of their website lately. I don't think that's my fault. Neither has RASNZ. I shall email them both. There are no issues except in your head. I don't think I can help with those either..Gmoney484 (talk) 20:13, 10 February 2010 (UTC)


 * My interest is only in the observatory section but arguably the whole article is short of references and should be tagged (as the Alumni section is). As for the rest, you should read Verifiability if you have not already done so. As well, take a look at Civility. -Arb. (talk) 22:48, 10 February 2010 (UTC)


 * You are right, of course. My comments were inappropriate and I apologise. I have emailed RASNZ to remove the old information. The information on the MAGS wiki is 100% correct (as I stated it). Personally I don't find the historical fact interesting or relevant but again maybe I'm wrong. I think the verifiability comes here SelfpubGmoney484 (talk) 01:07, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

Definition of Alumnus
Hi! Left you a message on my talk page. --UnicornTapestry (talk) 11:32, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:TransitMAGS.jpeg
Thank you for uploading File:TransitMAGS.jpeg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is [ a list of your uploads].

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Tb hotch .™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions.  23:04, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 29
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Halcyon Tour, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Studio (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:08, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Katango for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Katango is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Katango until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Northamerica1000(talk) 18:43, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
Northamerica1000(talk) 23:41, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
Northamerica1000(talk) 12:43, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Katango


A tag has been placed on Katango, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate,. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. VQuakr (talk) 07:28, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of The Great War Exhibition


A tag has been placed on The Great War Exhibition, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:58, 19 December 2016 (UTC)