User talk:GnD2020

August 2021
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Electric guitar. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it.  MrOllie (talk) 11:00, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

It was not a spam link. I backed up my statement about the electronics of cheap electric guitars with actual tests I have performed. You didn't even check the source? I bought 5 cheap electric guitars and tested them for a month. Just here to share what I found out. And the Wikipedia article was lacking info about the electronics of cheap electric guitars. It only talked about tonewood as an opinion-based statement with no real proof.

Wikipedia is not and link farm. True. But it's not a place for people to share their opinion without backing them up. Hopefully, you understand this.

Sighing
can you please sign by using 4 tildes.

Also can you please read wp:indent.Slatersteven (talk) 13:05, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

SPA
Please read wp:spa and wp:not. Right now you are one, and might be seen as the other.Slatersteven (talk) 13:07, 2 August 2021 (UTC) I'm sorry man. Didn't mean to bug anyone. But can't you notice that you guys are not very clear with your statements. I only asked questions to understands what to do.


 * And you have been answered, it is time to accept that answer and move on.Slatersteven (talk) 13:31, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

Well not actually. But I'll let things calm down so that no one gets too emotional with me. I'll be back:) I wish you all the best. Best regards, Teemu Suomala- Guitar-expert at Guitaristnextdoor.comGnD2020 (talk) 13:35, 2 August 2021 (UTC) sorry, I only now saw your message on the other page. But, I'll get my statement onto the electric guitar page. Trust me :)
 * I would advise no coming back if your sole intent is to add this site of yours as a source again, as I said read wp:spa.Slatersteven (talk) 13:44, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for the advice man. But my sole intent is not that. I wrote earlier my statement was removed completely. It added value, it was true. Still, removed. And you didn't say anything about that. Probably because you didn't read my messages. Don't treat everyone as a spammer, please don't. Spammers are annoying, trust me, I know. I got over 50 messages every day through my contact form before installing the spamblock plugin. When I roam Wikipedia I'll add something when I found something to be missing. I won't use the tests I perform as a source for now. But I will at some point. Things change man. Once non-expert on your eyes doesn't mean it's always like that. Hopefully you are on the same page with me. All love to you man.
 * THis is now a warning. You have been told your site is a wp:sps, if you try to add it again that may well be a violation of wp:not and wp:linkspam. It will almost certainly be seen as wp:tenditious and you will be sanctioned. I suggest you try to make other contributions.Slatersteven (talk) 14:05, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

Wait, what is this? I just meant that if I gain the known expert level in your eyes, then I'll talk about the matter again. I didn't mean that I just accidentally start adding something like crazy. Aren't you being a bit too judging now. I have been nice to you. And stopped when I got an real answer. And didn't even demand answers to all my questions.

Let's take an example, some sites have not been good sources in your eyes before. But they are now. That's what I meant. What's the problem with that? We evolve. Once an amateur in your eyes doesn't mean always being an amateur in your eyes.

And remember that there is a real human being on the other side. I have treated you like one. I expect you to treat me like one.
 * OK fair enough.Slatersteven (talk) 14:33, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

thank you!GnD2020 (talk) 14:45, 2 August 2021 (UTC)