User talk:Gnatbuzz

March 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia.
 * Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
 * The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): rule: 'geocities\.com' (link(s): http://www.geocities.com/solarguard/amerindian/algonk.html) . If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, or similar site, then please check the information on the external site thorougly.	Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creators copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source.	Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).
 * Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites.	 For more information about me, see my FAQ page.	 Thanks! XLinkBot (talk) 16:18, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

September 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Deconstructhis (talk) 15:04, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

March 2012
Please don't add nonsense to articles, as you did on cancer. Persistent behaviour will lead to blocking of your account. JFW &#124; T@lk  06:35, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Joseph (son of Jacob). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Dougweller (talk) 21:52, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

Blocked
Further to my above message, I have blocked your account for a month. Not a single edit of yours seems to based on verifiable information. The symptoms of carbolic acid poisoning are not remotely like those of cancer, and the Biblical character Joseph did not in fact travel by ship after being sold into slavery. Your account may be unblocked if you agree to only add verifiable non-controversial information. JFW &#124; T@lk  22:04, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

That is not true in terms of my contribution. I have made references where references are available, especially with regards to oral traditions and first-hand experiences. The editing is from my own dowsing, which is a traditional practice, and working directly with native North American healers. I have an awakened spirit, which is God, as Christ, and would appreciate if you would allow me to edit the pages as truth.

You, as editors, (I am a contributor, not an editor) are being rather dictatorial and close-minded in not allowing Wikipedia to be edited by those who have contributions to make that go beyond your rather limited experience as people.

I would like to know if you actually ever hear a mind-spirit as a person around you as a voice, because that is what is experienced in sweatlodge and also by native people who talk to those who have left their bodies. Your very narrow 'Western' viewpoint is contributing to the ignorance of this earth. I hope you can live with your own actions as people once you realize how you have blocked the truth from being posted on this website, particularly with regard to cancer.

I have dowsed that you have carbolic acidosis (severe), nitric acidosis, and phosphoric acidosis. I hope you wake up soon, sir.

And all the 290 people you have not allowed to contribute, I hope they can forgive you for taking over the word 'cancer' and Medicine and not allowing them to contribute with the truth that they know.

And for all those native people who have tried to edit Wikipedia and you have taken over the spiritual pages because you to not honour or trust that they speak the truth from their own understanding and first-hand experiences and oral traditions, without a printed, edited source, I hope they forgive you as well.

I am also a professional biologist, sirs. I hope you have the awakening you need to really understand how much damage you are doing by deciding that someone's contribution is causing a problem. The problem is with you, not the information I provide, as you feel you are the expert for the world in terms of what is truth. You are not, God is. And may God help you.

Natalie Helferty


 * Everyone who makes the slightest change in an article is an editor - that's our word for such people and thus you are an editor. Wikipedia does not accept information acquired by editors in any fashion, see WP:NOR and WP:VERIFY. If you continue to edit after your block in this fashion you will be blocked indefinitely, particularly as you are editing on medical topics where we have a very strict policy about this. Dougweller (talk) 06:00, 4 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Natalie, your response confirms that you do not seem to understand the most basic of Wikipedia's editing policies. You would not expect an encyclopedia to contain information originally researched by its editors. All we do is reproduce what is already covered in high-quality secondary sources.
 * Please follow Doug's advice and familiarise yourself with WP:NOR and WP:NPOV. You are free to include the whackiest of theories, but only if they are reported in secondary sources.
 * Oh, by the way, for someone with carbolic acidosis (severe), nitric acidosis, and phosphoric acidosis I feel perfectly well, and I am already fully awake with the assistance of caffeine. JFW &#124; T@lk  09:04, 5 March 2012 (UTC)