User talk:Gnome Economics

Old Grey Whistle Test
You don't feel an invitation to provide a Fair Use rationale for this image might have been appropriate here? -- Rodhullandemu  (talk - contribs) 00:25, 31 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Was it required? --Gnome Economics 00:26, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Perhaps not, but some of us don't always remember everything all the time. We are busy creating an encyclopedia, against all the odds. -- Rodhullandemu  (talk - contribs) 00:30, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Bless. It must be terrible. --Gnome Economics 00:35, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
 * It is. If it were only vandals, it would be more tolerable, but when one is patronised into the bargain, it becomes beyond WP:CIVIL and not WP:AGF. Do you ever have someone coming round to unmow your lawn for you? -- Rodhullandemu  (talk - contribs) 00:38, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Did you ever have someone point out that your lawn needed mowing? --Gnome Economics 00:46, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Yes, but it was done with such good grace that I could not find it in my heart to delay the job any further. However, your attitude has convinced me that my efforts would be better directed to contributing to another venture. And before you say "Puuh!", I'll just say that I am sick and tired of all the sniping and negativity that deters good editors here. Well, it works. Have a happy life, short though it may be. Sanctimonious prat. -- Rodhullandemu  (talk - contribs) 00:51, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Ok, then. TTFN. --Gnome Economics 00:54, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

Discussion on WP:AN/I
Although it already seems to be resolved, a discussion involving you was opened on the administrator's noticeboard. See Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents. You should have been informed that this thread had been started. Neil  ☎  11:06, 2 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Ok, another discussion at Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents alleging sockpuppetry. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 02:37, 22 November 2007 (UTC)