User talk:Gnomesaregood

January 2009
Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. R andom H umanoid ( &rArr; ) 23:19, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

And I consider your attacks on Ysabella Brave's entry for deletion a personal attack on her. Please stop that. Again, my entries are not personal attacks on you, but on the idea that one individual could put someone's entry in an uproar based on their erroneous assumptions. You have been factually inaccurate. Pointing that out is not a personal attack, it is being accurate. You have yet to revise your original erroneous entries in which you misstated the number of videos she had posted, as well as posting your own personal opinion that she left YouTube long before the suspension. This was your speculation and erroneous in view of the facts of her continued postings of videos disproving your allegation.

I also consider what you've written above a direct threat to me, which, of course, could be seen by many as uncivil by its very nature and reason for you to be blocked. And, of course, I would think posting inaccurate information to get someone's entry deleted might also be action for blocking. And, I have suspicions that you have ulterior motives and are not unbiased in this matter based on the rapidity with which you marked this entry for deletion after her channels were suspended.

The person who should stay cool is the person who feels it is their godlike power to delete someone's (anyone's) entry merely because THEY don't think the person is notable despite the obvious achievements of that person. And, it is obvious by the other responses to your efforts to get this entry deleted that your opinion concerning Ysabella Brave is vastly in the minority. And that it seems to be that you accuse those who disagree with you of being uncivil when in fact they are disagreeing with your specious rationalizations and disproving your arguments. Again, that's not being uncivil it is merely being accurate. Signed: Gnomesaregood

Please do not attack other editors. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. R andom H umanoid ( &rArr; ) 23:46, 1 January 2009 (UTC)


 * I really have no patience for this. Concentrate on the article only.  Please stop maligning me; it is unproductive and doesn't lead to constructive discussions.-- R andom H umanoid ( &rArr; ) 23:47, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

I am not maligning you. You seem to think that anyone who disagrees with you is maligning you when, in fact, all they've done is point out the fallacies of your arguments. It is you who have maligned a talented woman like Ysabella Brave, as well as others, with your deletionist strategy. You continually make threats against me to have me blocked. I would consider that a personal attack on me and against civility and against Wikipedia's policies. You, in fact, have been maligning me. Of the two of us, I would think you would be the one who should be blocked. Deletionists in general are destructive of the open idea of Wikipedia and seek to have their opinions on whom should or should not be in Wikipedia prevail. Once someone or a topic has been included in Wikipedia, unless that inclusion was somehow fraudulent, then that person or topic should remain in Wikipedia forever. End of discussion. Signed Gnomesaregood.

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. R andom H umanoid ( &rArr; ) 03:37, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive comments. If you continue to make personal attacks on other people, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. R andom H umanoid ( &rArr; ) 04:12, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

Please stop making threats against me. You do not have the authority to block me. Just because you have the hubris to think something is a threat, does not make it so. I will certainly fight any blocking and request that you be blocked for repeatedly vandalizing Ysabella Brave's entry, and for your continued threats to me. You yourself state that you have no tolerance for blatant vandalism -- "In other words, one strike and you're out." I would then request that Wikipedia apply this standard to you. You attempted to have her entry deleted and failed at that. So, you are mercilessly vandalizing her entry in a way that I consider vandalism. I'm very suspect of your motives concerning Ysabella Brave. I consider you are engaging in an edit war. Now, you have consistently made threats against me. Please stop these threats or I will be forced to file a grievance against you and request that you be permanently blocked from editing anything on Wikipedia. I do not wish to engage in any further discussion with you and am politely asking that you leave me alone and stop threatening me and stop vandalizing Ysabella Brave's entry. You tried to get it deleted. You lost that argument. It is now time for you to stop vandalzing her account in retribution and move on to someone else. Since you've said that fewer than 25% of the current articles would survive your pruning process, you have many other entries to attack. signed Gnomesaregood

You have been blocked for a period of 24 hours from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text below. -- VS talk 07:57, 8 January 2009 (UTC)