User talk:Gnovak55

I am not sure about your additions to the article on St. Paul. One difficulty with text quoting is that there are other texts which say different things. One has only to look at the commentary on the law in the Sermon on the Mount which casts down on the apparent plain meaning of your text. You may be aware of the debate about the meaning of the notion that Christ is the fulfilment of the law. Also, your additions have about them the tone of arguing a case, which is not how I see WP operating. Ideally your observations on sin need integrating within the text. Since the article is already perceived by some editors as being over sceptical, this may result in problems. I think there should be something on sin and on the law; the other problem is that this is not a thesis on Paul - it would be hundreds of pages long. I simply make these observations because I fear that what will now happen is that there will be huge additions to an already long article which emphasis the negative. We shall no doubt see. Roger Arguile 14:59, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

I have now added an explanation as to why I think your edit is not well founded on the talk page of Paul of Tarsus. I hope you don't find my response too abrupt. I believe that it is more complicated than you suggest. Roger Arguile 17:46, 11 December 2006 (UTC)