User talk:Go2rutledge

Quite a start...
To date, you have made 6 edits, and all 6 have been quickly reverted as incorrect, improper, unsupported or unneeded. May I suggest you take some to review the 'welcome' template I've added above, follow some of links, do some reading and learn how to contribute more effectively? It's up to you, but otherwise you're just wasting your time, (and the time those that have to fix your mistakes). Don't be afraid to ask for help if you're stuck or unsure. There is plenty of assistance available if you need it. Have a nice day. - the WOLF  child  04:39, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

December 2017
Please do not create, maintain or restore hoaxes on Wikipedia, as you did at 2017. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia — and then to correct them if possible. Please do not disrupt Wikipedia. Feel free to take a look at the five pillars of Wikipedia to learn more about this project and how you can contribute constructively. Thank you. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 23:43, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

How do you know it's a hoax?

Proposed deletion of Oof (meme)


The article Oof (meme) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "not notable"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tagishsimon (talk) 04:15, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Oof (meme)


A tag has been placed on Oof (meme) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Natureium (talk) 19:17, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

December 2018
Hello, I'm Shellwood. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Ty Pennington— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Shellwood (talk) 18:57, 17 December 2018 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to God. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Shellwood (talk) 18:59, 17 December 2018 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at User:Shellwood, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Shellwood (talk) 19:04, 17 December 2018 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent vandalism. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Widr (talk) 19:04, 17 December 2018 (UTC)