User talk:Go Phightins!/Archive 21

DYK for Luis García (pitcher)
The DYK project (nominate) 00:07, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

Another request for a technically inclined editor
Hello talk page stalkers, I have another request for one of you. I am looking to change the automatic date insertion in the cite toolbar (RefToolbar 2.0), so that it enters dates in the format MD,Y (i.e. January 1, 2013) for the access date. Presently, it inserts dates in the format 1 January 2013 (DMY). Since I edit mostly American topics, that is not what it should read, yet it is what I use, as I don't know how to change it and am too lazy to type it out, for the most part. I read this, but am more confused than when I started. I don't think anyone other than myself is able to fix it (other than admin), as I am guessing an edit to my js or css page is necessary, but if someone could tell me exactly what to post, I would be grateful. Thanks in advance, and have a great week.  Go  Phightins  !  02:18, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
 * It took me forever, but I figured it out. Add the following to your common.js page

You'll probably want to add something to remind you what it is, so: Ryan Vesey 03:15, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Well, if it took you forever, it would have taken me centuries. Thank you very much for your trouble, Ryan.  Go  Phightins  !  10:33, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

September 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=572561178 your edit] to 2013 Penn State Nittany Lions football team may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry, just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:34, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
 * 1a90-11e3-8fde-001a4bcf6878.html|accessdate=September 12, 2013|newspaper=The Daily Collegian|date=September 11, 2013|location=University Park, PA}}
 * ✅ Ryan Vesey 01:39, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Edit conflicted with you =p. Thanks.  Go  Phightins  !  01:40, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

a couple of things ...
1. Nice work on the 2013 Penn State football page page during the first 2 games of the season. You have a way with the words in addition to the data. (I'm more of a data man.) 2. Speaking of being addicted to the data, I just finished the Game Log for the 2006 Phillies page. I learned much about shortcuts as I worked through it. Take a look and make any suggestions. If I decide attack the 2005 Phillies, I'll need to remember those shortcuts. But first, 3. I want to put in the game log for the 2014 Phillies (the schedule was just released). Notice the red ink; so the page must be started. The blank game log will be immensely easier than what I just tackled for 2006. Any suggestions would be welcome. Bob305 (talk) 02:55, 12 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Hi Bob, thanks for the encouragement! My end state with the 2013 season page is to bring it to good article status, and it is easier for me to put in a lot of data at the time and edit out what proves unnecessary than to try to go back through and fill holes when a reviewer has a question. I don't have much grasp of templates, but luckily the Good Lord blessed me with a pretty good writing ability, which I can apply. For the 2014 season, I saw the schedule was just released, looks like a pretty tough one, back and forth between home and road a lot. Anyway, for now, I would suggest creating the schedule in a sandbox, as some people get cranky when season pages are created prematurely. Why, I don't know, but they do. Yes there is WP:CRYSTAL, but already it more than meets WP:GNG, but I digress. Thanks a lot for your work on those schedules - talk about a tedious task. It's always nice to have a fellow PSU/Phillies fan around :-) Any predictions for Saturday?  Go  Phightins  !  03:00, 12 September 2013 (UTC)


 * I don't know why the material posted 2X... Thanks for the advice. Bob305 (talk) 03:08, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Prediction for Saturday: 24-21 PSU, Sam Ficken will have a FG early and then the teams will trade TDs and the lead for the rest of the game. Okay, the 2014 Phillies schedule/game log is completed and in my sandbox. It was much easier to create when I'm not trying to insert winning and losing pitchers, etc. The sortable schedule on the Phillies site allowed me to create it opponent-by-opponent rather than working day-by-day. Bob305 (talk) 01:22, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
 * That's convenient - I find MLB websites rather intuitive, especially compared to the NFL websites, but I digress. I am going to go 27-17 PSU for Saturday - I think Hackenberg will struggle in the first half, but the running game will carry the team, and the defense will play well as always. We can hope, at least.  Go  Phightins  !  02:48, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 11 September 2013

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 08:38, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 16
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2013 Philadelphia Eagles season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ryan Mathews (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:17, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

Grant input
Hello! I wanted to let you know that I've prepared a good portion of the grant over at meta:Grants:IEG/Reimagining WP Mentorship, but I'd really appreciate your review and input as soon as it is convenient for you! Feel free to just make changes, especially in regards to budgeting (unsure of prospective values), additions, and changes in wording. Thanks! --Jackson Peebles (talk) 02:52, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
 * I am unsure of the dollar amounts as well ... not sure what the "going rate" for that is these days. I will take a look in the next few days.  Go  Phightins  !  21:15, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 September 2013

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 10:25, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.

IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.

Changes to SuggestBot's suggestions
We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:


 * Views/Day : Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.
 * Quality : Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.

The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:


 * Content : Is more content needed?
 * Headings : Does this article have an appropriate section structure?
 * Images : Is the number of illustrative images about right?
 * Links : Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?
 * Sources : For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:47, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

Dear Go–P:
I want to express you my deepest gratitude for your sincere appreciation of my work. Cheers, and keep your mind sharp and a healthy body. MusiCitizen (talk) 16:00, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 23
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2013 Cincinnati Bengals season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Marvin Jones (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

Your involvement with DRN
Hi there, I noticed that you haven't been as active at DRN as you was before. DRN has been a bit backlogged lately and we could use some extra hands. We have updated our volunteer list to a new format, Dispute resolution noticeboard/Volunteers (your name is still there under the old format if you haven't updated it) and are looking into ways to make DRN more effective and more rewarding for volunteers (your input is appreciated!). If you don't have much time to volunteer at the moment, that's fine too, just move your name to the inactive list (you're free to add yourself back to active at any time). Hope to see you again soon :) Steven Zhang (talk) 13:18, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Hi Steven, I will try to get over there in the next few days. Thanks for the reminder! -  Go  Phightins  !  16:41, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 September 2013

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 10:28, 27 September 2013 (UTC)

Hello
See you are online and i would realy need some professional help. Would you pls so kind to have 5 minutes for me? kind regardsAdniim- (talk) 06:54, 27 September 2013 (UTC)

What can I do for you, Adniim?  Go  Phightins  !  10:33, 27 September 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for reply. I got a problem. I wrote an article and then there came a personal motifated 1 edit account witch did vanadlism to this article and did AFD to it. Also it seams he got some friends witch supported him a bit. This all happens when the article was still under construction and had a notice - do not change this article. its about this article Michel Von Tell

the afd seams to be going unfair and not very objectiv and nice. maybe you be be a bit more objectiv and open. here my arguments why this should stay. WP:BIO says

1 .Has been featured multiple times in notable mainstream media. DONE MMnews (alexa rank 500 of germany), Russia today (after cnn biggest news tv of the word), paraguay television and some more. see in article.

2 Has had significant roles in multiple films, shows, or other productions. DONE Films, audio books, shows, books, interviews, articles, big blogs etc see in article (witch was/is still under construction).

3 Has a large fan base. DONE

It of course has! you see about 1 million views on YT. His politic documentation alone got about 100 000 views. and this is quite a lot if you keep in mind it is a documentary about geopolitics!! also it is SWITZERLAND - less people then NYC! and this 7 million people their got 4 diffent languages! finaly you see he had very much highly notable guests. and i also showed their the YT channel of the 2 biggest TV stations of the country. www.youtube.com/user/sfr/videos this the offical channel of the 2 biggest tv stations of switzerland SF1 SF2 Schweizer Fernsehen.

have a look at how many views they got and compare please!

are this not quite many good arguments to keep this article? special if you keep in mind how small switzerland is, this article is just under construction? i mean hey. u know as good as me. 30% of Wikipedia got much less sources then this. would be nice if you could think about your voteing or let me know what exactly yor argument is. also i could show you hunderet of journalists witch are listed in wikipedia witch got WAY less sources and notablity then this article. here just some examples. Osaremen ehi james Larry Izamoje Chief Olu Oyesanya Meir Javedanfar Óðinn Jónsson Juan Bautista Rivarola Matto Leopoldo Ramos Giménez Luis Ruffinelli Alfredo Seiferheld Adriano Irala Fulgencio R. Moreno Sali Nivica Ludmilla Pajo Bedri Pejani Skender Temali Mirko Gashi Mirshahin Agayev Aslan Aslanov Kurt Thyboe Monica Ritterband Henrik Qvortrup Hans Pilgaard

now tell me pls - why they are in and this article is not good enough? what is missing they got? would be nice if you could help me a bit. but anyway thank you for takeing time. Adniim- (talk) 03:14, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

Bryan D. Brown redux
Referencing back to our conversation a month ago... the article finally got copyedited by the guild, huzzah. However, during that time I forgot all about expanding the lead.

So shortly here when I do go back and fix that it will have missed the nice copyedit job. I will probably have to look at other well-known generals with good assessments to get a feel for their leads. Shucks, anywho.. once I fix that up how do I go about submitting it for a GA nomination. :3 Up until this point I've only made B-class work. Is it as simple as going to WP:GAN and listing it or is there anything else I should do? Thanks much, —  - dain   omite    05:17, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Good morning, Dainomite. To nom for GAN, simply follow the instructions located at Good_article_nominations/Instructions – though I have a dozen GAs under my belt, I still have to read them every time to make sure I don't screw something up. Article is looking great, should be worthy of GA once you flesh out the lead. Happy editing,  Go  Phightins  !  10:38, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 30
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2013 Penn Quakers football team, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page St. John's University (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:37, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

October 2013 AFC Backlog elimination drive
 WikiProject Articles for creation Backlog Elimination Drive WikiProject AFC is holding a one month long Backlog Elimination Drive!

The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from October 1st, 2013 – October 31st, 2013.

Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive.

There is a backlog of over articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!

A new version of our AfC helper script is released! It includes many bug fixes, new improvements and features, code enhancements, and more. If you want to see a full list of changes, visit the changelog. Please report bugs and feature requests there, too! Thanks. -- Mdann 52   talk to me! This newsletter was delivered on behalf of WPAFC by EdwardsBot (talk) 15:19, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

EotW situation
Hey GoP. Check out my talk page where today Gwillikers thanks me for nominating him. If there is a glitch somewhere, userlinks, or ((u|_______)) for example, all our nominations are getting advance notice and the surprise factor is ruined. Not sure what to do or how to find out HOW gwillickers found out. Any ideas?```Buster Seven   Talk  17:50, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately, the preloaded text at WikiProject Editor Retention/Editor of the Week/Nominations/preload does not match the instructions at the top of nominations page, which says "Just type their name using plain text, and we will manually go over and verify the information." You may wish to edit the preloaded text accordingly. isaacl (talk) 21:41, 30 September 2013 (UTC)