User talk:Goa4goa

April 2019
Hello, I'm CLCStudent. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Stripper have been [ disallowed by an edit filter] because they did not appear constructive. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page, which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Also feel free to ask for assistance at the Help Desk whenever you like to. Thank you. CLCStudent (talk) 17:26, 13 April 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pussy torture, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pickle ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Pussy_torture check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Pussy_torture?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 19:54, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

WP:See also
Read WP:See also. When a term is already linked in the article, it doesn't need to be in the See also section. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 06:55, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

Images
Regarding what you stated about real-life images, this is not necessarily true. WP:Not censored is tempered by WP:GRATUITOUS, which, for example, states, "Offensive material should be used only if its omission would cause the article to be less informative, relevant, or accurate, and no equally suitable alternative is available." That stated, the image you added there is tame. So I won't revert it. But I can see editors feeling that a picture of a naked or semi-naked couple kissing is not needed, that its omission doesn't cause the article to be less informative, relevant, or accurate. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 04:42, 21 October 2019 (UTC)