User talk:Goatasaur

''Please sign your post by typing four tildes after your comment ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ). I will respond to your post on this page.''

Congrats!!!
I am aware that you don't know me, but I just thought I'd congratulate you on your 3 year anniversary of being here! JaredW 19:48, 23 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Thanks. Wikipedia has one of the best communities on the 'net. -- goatasaur 22:35, 25 January 2006 (UTC)

Prof. Carlos Nemer
Carlos Nemer Carlos Nemer (1965, Espírito Santo, Brasil) is a university professor at Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro-UFRJ) in Industrial Engineering Department (DEI) and at Universidade Estadual do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ). Professor Nemer holds three undergraduate degrees: Civil Engineering major in Environmental Science (Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro-PUC-RJ), Architecture and Urban Design (Faculdade de Arquitetura e Urbanismo-Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro-FAU-UFRJ) and Law/Environmental law (Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro-PUC-RJ). He also has two graduate degrees: Master of Science in Systems engineering from Instituto Militar de Engenharia-IME (dissertation topic: a linear programming model related to fleet planing process including a field application for the brazilian truck transportation industry) and a MBA in Corporate Finance at Fundação Getulio Vargas-FGV-RJ. His fields of expertise include: His personal interests are soccer playing (he pushes for Clube de Regatas do Flamengo (Flamengo Football Club)), Chess, Greek Mythology and Science Fiction.
 * Economic system Engineering;
 * Financial Engineering;
 * Corporate_Finance;
 * Project Finance;
 * Enterprise Application Integration (EAI);
 * Computer Systems applied to Industrial Engineering'';
 * Environmental Science;
 * Organizational Innovation.


 * I'll keep that in mind. goatasaur 02:24, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

answering to you my name is Carlos Vieira (you wanted me to sign...) --- (geting ready for Carnival and the world cup which will ours for the sixtieth time ! take care.

Vandalism
My friend and I have been trying to fix the "Lawrence North" article because at least one person (Fizzlestick) has been vandalizing the site with rude material. Unfortunately, you sent a warning to my friend for making these fixes. My friend is ip address 128.211.215.78 and I am ip address 12.208.100.117. Just wanted to let you know. Thanks so much. 12.208.100.117 04:34, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Apologies, I thought I saw continued vandalism in your edits. User:Fizzlestick is the culprit here but at least one other anon IP was vandalizing the Lawrence North High School article.  -- goatasaur 04:39, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for reverting the vandalism on the Sago Mine page. --Beth Wellington 22:17, 25 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Happy to help! -- goatasaur

I'd just like to say thanks for your swift rolling back of the totally unneccesary recent edits made to Swansea University Computer Society. Thanks very much! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Welshbyte (talk • contribs)


 * Also no problem. Vandalism is quick to fix. -- goatasaur 22:27, 25 January 2006 (UTC)

My RFA
Hi, thanks for participating in my RfA discussion. Unfortunately, my fellow Wikipedians have decided at this time that I am not suitable to take on this additional responsibility, as the RfA failed with a result of 66/27/5 (71.0% support). If you voted in support of my request, thank you! If you decided to oppose me at this time, then I hope that if I do choose to reapply in the future, the effort I will make in the meantime to improve and expand my contributions to Wikipedia may persuade you to reconsider your position. All the best, Proto t c 10:28, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

Seward Collins
Hi, Goatasuar! Say, I saw that you were on the people who worked on the Seward Collins entry. I'm the Michael Tucker that referenced at the end of the text and I'm trying to find out whoever it was that wrote the piece. I'd love to share notes with the only other person I've ever heard of who had an interest in "poor Sewie" as his friends called. Would you be the source?--Mjt57 13:13, 17 February 2006 (UTC)


 * Sorry, not me. -- goatasaur 03:01, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

"deep" reverts
''Please be careful when reverting articles and give preference to editing the appropriate section and only reverting in cases of clear vandalism. Your reverting of the Harry Potter article caused a corrected piece of information to become un-corrected. Thanks! -- goatasaur 21:13, 7 April 2006 (UTC)''


 * Thank you, and my bad. Just what "corrected" information was uncorrected?  We were engaged in reverting disallowed and unauthoritative speculation on the release dates (until it was clear that this would result in a reversion war with those insane fanatics who insisted on being the first to post a rumored "target release date" as a "confirmed release date", in spite of much discussion and attempted administrative corrections).  The mob mentality ruled after a few hours, and the administrators and veterans took a wait-and-see position, rather than constantly reverting and counselling the rabid fanatics not to post unverifiable information. --T-dot 15:29, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
 * PS - I reviewed my reversions - the other material that was removed in reversion was a rather non-NPOV "Criticism" section added without any explanation by an anonymous IP address editor - stating essentially that "some fans of the LOTR and Narnia fantasy genre feel that the Harry Potter series is inferior..." (paraphrased) and went on to cite numerous examples to illustrate the point. This information is hardly startling - comparing classic Tolkien and Lewis literature to contemporary Rowling material - but it is completely irrelevant to the HP article.  It smelled like a 9th grade book report on comparisons of English Literature.  But OK fine. --T-dot 15:53, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
 * It wasn't anything major, just a date that had been fixed regarding one of the books. -- goatasaur 23:22, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

User account listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect User account. Since you had some involvement with the User account redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 20:29, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of List of works published posthumously for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of works published posthumously is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of works published posthumously until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Paradoctor (talk) 20:35, 29 November 2017 (UTC)