User talk:God6181996/Sandbox

Interrogation Proposal Plan:

- Lead Although the lead (introduction) paragraph offers useful information, I feel that it can be improved upon. It is fairly short, and when we were completing the Week 3 assignment "Evaluating Articles and Sources", one of the points in the training highlights that a short lead might indicate that it was roughly pieced together by multiple editors. In this article, I do feel that the lead is fairly short, and that it can be written in a more effective manner.

- Overall Quality The overall quality is rated at a C. After reading through the article myself, I find that some things can surely be improved upon to increase the quality of this article. First, I did notice a few grammatical errors, which of course might lead to the article being of lesser quality. In addition, though the information is useful, the way it is pieced together can be improved upon. For instance, sentences can be arranged to better flow, as well as the sequencing of information in paragraphs. Also, the wording in general seems to be slightly confusing or not thought out. I.e. "The importance of allowing the psychopathic interviewee to tell one lie after another and not confront until all of the lies have been presented is essential when the goal is to use the interview to expose the improbable statements made during the interview in future court proceedings." There are multiple sentences in this article that tend to be too wordy, or are simply run ons.

- Authorship The last thing I am aiming to do is reviewing the authorship of the article. Although all of the references seem to be both legitimate and credible, I noticed that many of the facts included in the article are not followed up with a citation. For instance, the entire section labeled Around the World: United Kingdom seems to be lacking in citations, as facts are presented without being referenced. This is seen in multiple portions of the article, and so this is definitely something that should be focused on, as it is important to ensure that the public is receiving legitimate facts. God6181996 (talk) 04:26, 19 February 2018 (UTC)