User talk:God MK2

Christopher Curtis deleted
Some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Christopher Curtis may not be sufficiently well-known to merit articles of their own. The Wikipedia community welcomes newcomers, and encourages them to become Wikipedians. On Wikipedia, each user is entitled to a user page in which they can describe themselves, and this article's content may be incorporated into that page. However, to merit inclusion in the encyclopedia proper, a subject must be notable. We encourage you to write or improve articles on notable subjects. I have deleted the article as it did not assert the notability or significance of the subject. Please read over Wikipedia's deletion policy and speedy deletion policy. Please do not recreate the article without first contacting me. If you would like for me to restore its content and move it into your userspace, please contact me, and I will do so gladly. Thanks for your understanding. AmiDaniel (talk) 05:56, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

I took a look and agree that I cannpt see snything whatsoever which is notable in the article.Blnguyen | Have your say!!! 06:05, 30 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Beyond the topic's lack of notability, the article was also clearly an attack page with statements like "Chris Curtis is one of the most annoying and unintelligent cripples of all time." Wikipedia maintains several policies prohibiting personal attacks and encouraging unbiased articles. If you can find reputable sources that confirm his notability and agree to address the topic in a unbiased tone, I will have no problem restoring the article; however, I will not restore it or allow for its recreation if the article remains an attack. AmiDaniel (talk) 06:07, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

"Chris Curtis is one of the most annoying and unintelligent cripples of all time." A direct quote from the film on him. If required I will remove it. However, I will we-write the entire article in an attempt to pass your inspection, and if required I will indeed get you a list of references on this topic showing that it does have importance. Is that alright?