User talk:God ryuuku

==Notability of Ritrom== A tag has been placed on Ritrom requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Movingboxes (talk) 16:27, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

September 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Blah, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Blah was changed by God ryuuku (u) (t) blanking the page on 2008-09-01T16:33:53+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 16:33, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

Stupid noob
A tag has been placed on Stupid noob, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing no content to the reader. Please note that external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article don't count as content. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template   to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. JNW (talk) 22:55, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you create an inappropriate page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.  Acroterion  (talk)  22:56, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

ED
Hey, you might not have meant it, but you marked this edit as minor. Please don't do that, as some editors have their watchlists set to ignore minor edits and they would miss a change to the article like this. As for the exact change, I have reverted it because it represented your opinion insofar as you were warning users to not visit the site. If you feel that a discussion of the sites "adult content" is important to the article, please go to the talk page and we can work something out with reliable sources that cover the subject. You may not realize it, but this article sees a lot of attention from regular wikipedia editors because of ED's history of criticizing wikipedia and posting terrible things about editors and admins here. So all of the statements in that article need to be sourced to a tee. Thank you, though, and welcome to wikipedia! Protonk (talk) 22:53, 19 September 2008 (UTC)