User talk:Goda Cmukaite/sandbox

Article Evaluation
Name of the article: Apple watch. Hyperlink: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple_Watch. I chose to evaluate this article because apple watch is a widely sold and used piece of technology.

Lead

Introductory paragraph clearly states what this article is going to be about. It gives examples of what an apple watch can do, and it goes on to explaining how apple watch creation came about. The second paragraph brings everything together and shows that the main talk is going to be about the specs and different models of the apple watch.

Content

The content of the article is relevant to the topic and is up to date. This article talks about the newest model of the apple watch which proves that the information is up to date. It has a good flow and a lot of good and precise information. In my opinion there is no content that does not belong, and everything seems to fit in.

Tone and Balance

This article is in neutral tone and it does not try to persuade the reader, it simply states the facts of apple watch creation.

Sources and References

All the reliable sources are provided in the references part of the article. All the resources are up to date and are written by diverse spectrum of authors. Upon checking a few links, I can conclude that they work properly and bring you to the right page.

Organization

Organization is simple and easy to follow with only a few grammatical errors. The text is organized by topic and is easy to read. First it talks about different designs and wristbands and then it expands to explaining the difference between generations and models.

Images and Media

The article provides pictures of the apple watch and a great comparison of model's chart. In the chart is explained the key differences and similarities between different models of the apple watch.

The Talk Page

It does not seem that this article was rated but it did say that this article was of interest to multiple wiki projects.

Overall Impression

Overall, I believe this article was professionally written and organized. It was easy to read and follow and I like how neatly it was organized. I like that it had a lot of sources to back up the information and it was highly informative. I do believe it had some grammatical errors, but it was not too significant in my opinion.

Peer review assignment 6 completed
Goda Cmukaite peer-reviewed Jaquan Moore article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Goda Cmukaite (talk • contribs) 03:23, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

assignment 7 completed
The suggestions from my peer review were very helpful and useful. I will be working on making my article point of view more neutral and make the structure more easy to follow. My peer pointed out to me that one of my bibliography links aren't working so I will be working on getting that fixed. I like his suggestion of comparing organic food vs. GMO and including a study that shows the difference between the two. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Goda Cmukaite (talk • contribs) 02:09, 13 October 2020 (UTC)